Floris Westerink1, Inge Huibregtse2, Marieke De Hoog3, Sjoerd Bruin4, Eelco Meesters5, Desiderius Brandjes1, Victor Gerdes1,5. 1. Department of internal medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. 4. Department of surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. 5. Department of internal medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery induces various gastrointestinal (GI) modifications. We performed the first study longitudinally assessing the effect of bariatric surgery on faecal inflammatory biomarker levels and its relation with GI complaints. METHOD: Faecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and calgranulin-C levels were determined in 41 patients (34 Roux-en-Y [RYGB], 7 sleeves) before and at 6-16 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Changes in biomarker levels and percentage of patients above reference value were determined. Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) was used to assess GI complaints at corresponding time points. The postoperative relation between GSRS score and biomarker levels above reference value was investigated. RESULTS: After RYGB, median calprotectin levels are significantly higher (>188, 104-415 μg/g) than before surgery (40, 19-78 μg/g; p < 0.001), and over 90% of patients have levels above reference value 1 year after surgery. Median lactoferrin was 0.4 (0.2-1.6) μg/g before, and >5.9 (1.8-13.6) μg/g after surgery (p < 0.001). Median calgranulin-C levels remained far below the reference value and were 0.13 (0.05-0.24) μg/g before and <0.23 (0.06-0.33) μg/g after surgery. Similar results were found after sleeve gastrectomy. No difference was seen in GSRS score for patients with calprotectin and lactoferrin levels above reference values. CONCLUSION: Faecal inflammatory biomarkers calprotectin and lactoferrin, but not calgranulin-C, rise above reference values shortly after bariatric surgery and remain elevated in the majority of patients. The discrepancy between calprotectin and calgranulin-C levels suggests no GI inflammation. Furthermore, patients after RYGB with biomarkers above the population reference value do not seem to have more GI complaints.
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery induces various gastrointestinal (GI) modifications. We performed the first study longitudinally assessing the effect of bariatric surgery on faecal inflammatory biomarker levels and its relation with GI complaints. METHOD: Faecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and calgranulin-C levels were determined in 41 patients (34 Roux-en-Y [RYGB], 7 sleeves) before and at 6-16 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Changes in biomarker levels and percentage of patients above reference value were determined. Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) was used to assess GI complaints at corresponding time points. The postoperative relation between GSRS score and biomarker levels above reference value was investigated. RESULTS: After RYGB, median calprotectin levels are significantly higher (>188, 104-415 μg/g) than before surgery (40, 19-78 μg/g; p < 0.001), and over 90% of patients have levels above reference value 1 year after surgery. Median lactoferrin was 0.4 (0.2-1.6) μg/g before, and >5.9 (1.8-13.6) μg/g after surgery (p < 0.001). Median calgranulin-C levels remained far below the reference value and were 0.13 (0.05-0.24) μg/g before and <0.23 (0.06-0.33) μg/g after surgery. Similar results were found after sleeve gastrectomy. No difference was seen in GSRS score for patients with calprotectin and lactoferrin levels above reference values. CONCLUSION: Faecal inflammatory biomarkers calprotectin and lactoferrin, but not calgranulin-C, rise above reference values shortly after bariatric surgery and remain elevated in the majority of patients. The discrepancy between calprotectin and calgranulin-C levels suggests no GI inflammation. Furthermore, patients after RYGB with biomarkers above the population reference value do not seem to have more GI complaints.
Authors: T Kaiser; J Langhorst; H Wittkowski; K Becker; A W Friedrich; A Rueffer; G J Dobos; J Roth; D Foell Journal: Gut Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: J S Hyams; G D Ferry; F S Mandel; J D Gryboski; P M Kibort; B S Kirschner; A M Griffiths; A J Katz; R J Grand; J T Boyle Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 1991-05 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Alexander C von Roon; Leonidas Karamountzos; Sanjay Purkayastha; George E Reese; Ara W Darzi; Julian P Teare; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Paris P Tekkis Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ronald H Clements; Quintin H Gonzalez; Allen Foster; William O Richards; James McDowell; Anthony Bondora; Henry L Laws Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Andrew Poullis; Russell Foster; Ajeya Shetty; Magne K Fagerhol; Michael A Mendall Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.254