| Literature DB >> 34122995 |
Andrew T Turley1, Andrew Danos2, Antonio Prlj1, Andrew P Monkman2, Basile F E Curchod1, Paul R McGonigal1, Marc K Etherington2,3.
Abstract
Charge transfer in organic fluorophores is a fundamental photophysical process that can be either beneficial, e.g., facilitating thermally activated delayed fluorescence, or detrimental, e.g., mediating emission quenching. N-Alkylation is shown to provide straightforward synthetic control of the charge transfer, emission energy and quantum yield of amine chromophores. We demonstrate this concept using quinine as a model. N-Alkylation causes changes in its emission that mirror those caused by changes in pH (i.e., protonation). Unlike protonation, however, alkylation of quinine's two N sites is performed in a stepwise manner to give kinetically stable species. This kinetic stability allows us to isolate and characterize an N-alkylated analogue of an 'unnatural' protonation state that is quaternized selectively at the less basic site, which is inaccessible using acid. These materials expose (i) the through-space charge-transfer excited state of quinine and (ii) the associated loss pathway, while (iii) developing a simple salt that outperforms quinine sulfate as a quantum yield standard. This N-alkylation approach can be applied broadly in the discovery of emissive materials by tuning charge-transfer states. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34122995 PMCID: PMC8159361 DOI: 10.1039/d0sc02460k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1N-Alkylation of Qn to N-methylquinium tetrafluoroborate, MeQn·BF4, N,N′-dimethylquinium bis(tetrafluoroborate), Me2Qn·2BF4, and iso-N-methylquinium tetra-fluoroborate, iMeQn·BF4. XRD structures of MeQn·BF4 and Me2Qn·2BF4 are shown in stick representation with N atoms as balls. Further XRD structures can be found in Fig. S16, S17 and Table S1.† Reagents and conditions: (i) (a) MeI, rt, 3 d, (b) AgBF4, MeCN, 60 °C, 10 min, 74% over 2 steps; (ii) (a) MeI, MeCN, 100 °C, 4 h, (b) AgBF4, MeOH, rt, 10 min, 79% over 2 steps; (iii) (a) allyl bromide, CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h, (b) MeI, MeCN, 100 °C, 3 h, (c) barbituric acid, Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol%), Me2SO, 40 °C, 16 h, (d) diisopropylaminomethyl polystyrene, MeOH, rt, 1 h, (e) AgBF4, MeOH, rt, 10 min, 79% over 5 steps.
Photophysical properties of Qn and its methylated derivatives
| Compound |
|
| Calculated | Presence of CT | Red-shifted absorption and emission | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeCN | H2O | MeCN | H2O | LE | CT | |||
|
| 0 | 22 | 3.45 (2.30) | 3.20 | 3.75 | 1.41 | Yes | No |
|
| 5 | 32 | 3.40 | 3.24 | 3.69 | — | No | No |
|
| 63 | 70 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 3.00 | — | No | Yes |
|
| 0 | 60 | — | 2.75 | — | 1.01 | Yes | Yes |
PLQYs (Φ) for Qn and MeQn·BF4 were measured with respect to a standard of 2-aminopyridine in 0.1 M aqueous H2SO4 (Φ = 60%)[38] and those of Me2Qn·2BF4 and iMeQn·BF4 were measured with respect to a standard of H2Qn·SO4 in 0.1 M aqueous H2SO4 (Φ = 55%).[27]
Anhydrous MeCN was used throughout the spectroscopic study.
Anhydrous MeCN solution with 10 mM Et3N used to suppress the formation of trace amounts of N1 protonated species resulting from adventitious water.
Excited-state energies in eV for protonated (rather than methylated) compounds calculated at the LR-TDDFT/ωB97X-D/6-31G* level of theory with state-specific implicit solvation (MeCN).
The presence or lack of an accessible CT state was determined by experimental observation (Fig. 1) and/or theoretical calculation (Tables S5 and S6).
Relative to the absorption and emission of Qn.
Fig. 1(a) Steady-state emission spectra of Qn dissolved in a series of solvents and excited at 3.75 eV, showing the LE and CT character of its emission. (b) The absorption (solid lines) and emission (dashed lines) spectra of Qn (purple), MeQn·BF4 (green), Me2Qn·2BF4 (blue), and iMeQn·BF4 (orange) in MeCN (20 μM). A significant shift in the absorption spectra is associated with the methylation of N2. The emission spectrum of iMeQn·BF4 in MeCN is omitted as partial protonation of N1 by adventitious water affects the spectrum. Instead, the absorption and emission spectra (black) of a MeCN solution of iMeQn·BF4 (20 μM) with Et3N (10 mM) are displayed to show there is no significant change in absorption with the addition of a base and that there is no emission in the visible region without protonation of N1. The excitation energies (Eex) used were 4.13 eV for Qn and MeQn·BF4 or 3.54 eV for Me2Qn·2BF4 and iMeQn·BF4 to allow comparison of PLQYs with known standards (Fig. S18–S26 and Table S2†).
Fig. 2Natural transition orbitals (NTOs) and energies characterizing the singlet emission of Qn from its LE and CT states, as well as MeQn+, iMeQn+ and Me2Qn2+, calculated at the LR-TDDFT/ωB97X-D/6-31G* level of theory with state-specific implicit solvation. ¶ indicates that protonated structures were used as electronically similar (Table S7†) models for the methylated salts.