| Literature DB >> 34122593 |
Yi-Hsien Shiao1, Yi-Chih Chen2, Yuan-Chieh Yeh1,3, Tse-Hung Huang1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (MA) addiction has become a crucial public health concern because of its adverse consequences to individuals and the society.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34122593 PMCID: PMC8166487 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5514873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Selected acupoints and LA frequencies.
Participant characteristics users.
| Mean or | SD or % | |
|---|---|---|
| Demographic variables | ||
| Age | 42 | 10.24 |
| Gender (female vs. male) | 4/11 | 26.6/73.3 |
| Marital status (married) | 5 | 33.3 |
| Level of education (years) | 11.5 | 0.73 |
|
| ||
| MA use patterns | ||
| Age of onset of MA use | 26.7 | 2.45 |
| Weekly use of MA (times) | 3.27 | 1.19 |
| Duration use of MA (years) | 4.2 | 0.77 |
| Polysubstance use (yes vs. no) | 4 | 26.6 |
|
| ||
| Comorbidities | ||
| HBV carrier | 2 | 13.3 |
| HCV carrier | 6 | 40 |
| Psychiatric disorder | 4 | 26.6 |
|
| ||
| LA + CBT treatment | ||
| Completion | 7 | 46.7 |
| Dropout | 8 | 53.3 |
|
| ||
| CBT program | ||
| LA + CBT ( | ||
| Completion | 6 | 85.7 |
| Dropout | 1 | 14.3 |
| LA dropout ( | ||
| Completion | 4 | 50 |
| Dropout | 4 | 50 |
|
| ||
| MA urine positive result | ||
| Before treatment ( | 8 | 53.3 |
| LA + CBT ( | ||
| Baseline | 4 | 57.1 |
| 1-month follow | 0 | 0 |
| 2-month follow | 2 | 28.6 |
| LA dropout ( | ||
| Baseline | 4 | 50 |
| 2-month follow | 5 | 62.5 |
Figure 2Flowchart of the study.
Generalized estimating equation analysis for scores on VAS for craving and refusal, PSQI, BAI, and BDI.
|
| Standard error |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAS for craving | 1st month vs. baseline | −0.1 | 0.7 | 0.90 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | −0.5 | 0.7 | 0.48 | |
|
| ||||
| VAS for refusal | 1st month vs. baseline | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.40 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.14 | |
|
| ||||
| PSQI | 1st month vs. baseline | −3.7 | 0.7 | <0.001 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | −4.1 | 0.7 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||||
| BDI | 1st month vs. baseline | −5.6 | 2.2 | 0.01 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | −8.2 | 2.4 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||||
| BAI | 1st month vs. baseline | −2.6 | 1.3 | 0.05 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | −2.5 | 2.1 | 0.22 | |
VAS, visual analog scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory. p < 0.05; p < 0.01; p < 0.001.
Figure 3Line chart of mean change difference in scores on VAS of craving (a) and refusal (b) at 1 and 2 months of treatment. P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (highly significant), and P < 0.001 (extremely significant).
Figure 4Line chart of mean change difference in scores on PSQI (a), BDI (b), and BAI (c) at 1 and 2 months after treatment. P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (highly significant), and P < 0.001 (extremely significant).
Generalized estimating equation analysis of urine MA and morphine levels and AST, ALT, and γ-GT levels.
|
| Standard error |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST | 1st month vs. baseline | −7.7 | 5.6 | 0.17 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | −5.0 | 5.0 | 0.33 | |
|
| ||||
| ALT | 1st month vs. baseline | −5.6 | 7.1 | 0.43 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | 27.1 | 22.4 | 0.23 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 1st month vs. baseline | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.20 |
| 2nd month vs. baseline | 13.5 | 9.5 | 0.16 | |
P < 0.05; P < 0.01; P < 0.001.
Figure 5Line chart of mean change difference in AST (a), ALT (b), and γ-GT (c) levels at 1 and 2 months after treatment. P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (highly significant), and P < 0.001 (extremely significant).