| Literature DB >> 34122132 |
Chia-En Yang1, Tsung-Ming Yeh2,3, Ching-Dong Chang4, Wen-Ling Shih2.
Abstract
In this study, waste fat from the Chinese soft-shelled turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis) was used as the raw material, and soft-shelled turtle oil (SSTO) was extracted by water heating. Analysis of the fatty acid composition of SSTO revealed that unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) comprised more than 70% of the oil, of which more than 20% were omega-3 poly-UFAs. DPPH radical scavenging and cellular ROS assays confirmed the reduction of oxidative stress by SSTO. In D-galactose-induced aging rats, SSTO feeding alone or in combination with swimming training resulted in improved memory and physical strength. In addition, SSTO feeding with swimming intervention significantly increased the SOD level and maintained better blood pressure in the aged rats. The serum DHEAS and soleus muscle glycogen level were also highly correlated with SSTO feeding and swimming training. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrated that SSTO has the potential to be developed into a health food that exerts anti-aging effects, and those effects are stronger when combined with daily swimming exercise.Entities:
Keywords: DHEAS; ROS; aging; soft-shelled turtle; swimming
Year: 2021 PMID: 34122132 PMCID: PMC8194302 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.660552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Flowchart of the animal experiment. One week after the animals had been allowed to adapt to the environment, the rats were injected subcutaneously with D-galactose to induce accelerated aging for 42 days. SSTO feeding and/or swimming training were started on day 14 after the D-galactose injections began and continued for 4 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using the Y-maze for learning memory performance and weight-loaded swimming for physical fitness testing. Blood pressure was also recorded and blood samples were collected for further analysis.
Fatty acid composition of the SSTO.
| Types of fatty acid | Content (%) | |
| omega-9 mono-UFAs | Oleic acid | 27.98 |
| omega-7 mono-UFAs | Palmitoleic acid | 6.52 |
| omega-6 poly-UFAs | Linoleic acid | 8.50 |
| Arachidonic acid | 2.12 | |
| omega-3 poly-UFAs | Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) | 12.97 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) | 5.37 | |
| Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) | 2.62 | |
| Alpha-linoleic acid | 1.04 | |
| SFAs | Palmitic acid | 20.27 |
| Steric acid | 5.94 | |
| Myristic acid | 3.55 | |
| Total | 96.88 |
FIGURE 2Antioxidant activity of SSTO. (A) DPPH assay. The y-axis shows the relative percentage of the residual DPPH level as compared with butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) as the positive control. The x-axis shows the positive and negative controls and SSTO samples at different concentrations prepared at various rendering temperatures. (B) Cellular ROS assay. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with SSTO, and the percentage of ROS reduction in the culture was measured. Cell viability was also monitored by MTT assay. *Statistically significant difference as compared with the non-SSTO treated group, but with 1 mM H2O2.
FIGURE 3Effects of SSTO and swimming training on aging rats. (A) Exploration evaluation. The left y-axis (black bars) shows the number of times that the rats entered the new environment (arm C) within 10 min, and the right y-axis (white bars) shows the average duration for which the animals stayed in arm C. (B) Mobility determination. The left y-axis (black bars) shows the traveling speed, and the right y-axis (white bars) indicates the spatial learning ability, as evaluated by the spontaneous alteration percentage. (C) SSTO and swimming training improved short-term spatial memory (black bars) and physical performance (white bars). Left y-axis: average time to find food; right y-axis: endurance measured as weight-loaded forced swimming duration. *#Statistically significant difference as compared with the aged rats with saline treatment; &statistically significant difference when compared with SSTO + swimming group.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure of the rats in this study.
| Blood pressure | |||
| Group | SBP (mmHg) | DBP (mmHg) | Average (mmHg) |
| Control | 116.0 ± 15.4* | 63.3 ± 21.5* | 81.3 ± 24.6* |
| Aged rats | 152.3 ± 10.5 | 115.8 ± 19.0 | 128.0 ± 15.2 |
| Aged rats + SSTO | 141.8 ± 20.1 | 73.2 ± 12.2* | 96.0 ± 14.1* |
| Aged rats + SSTO + swimming | 109.3 ± 35.3* | 74.5 ± 23.2* | 86.0 ± 25.8* |
| Aged rats + swimming | 140.3 ± 27.3 | 78.0 ± 8.4* | 98.8 ± 12.5* |
FIGURE 4Biochemical analysis of serum and muscle. (A) Effects of SSTO and/or swimming on serum SOD (black bars) and TAC (white bars) antioxidant enzyme activity. (B) Glycogen content (black bars; left y-axis) in the soleus muscle and serum DHEAS level (white bars; right y-axis). *#Statistically significant difference as compared with the aged rats with saline treatment; &statistically significant difference when compared with SSTO + swimming group.