| Literature DB >> 34121887 |
Haider Karar1, Muhammad Amjad Bashir2, Abdul Khaliq3, Muhammad Jaffar Ali4, Reem Atalla Alajmi5, Dina M Metwally5,6.
Abstract
Fodder crops play an important role in sustainable agriculture as they provide feed for animals, which is ultimately converted to human food. Alfalfa is one of the most important fodder crops having high nutritive value for livestock. However, seed production of alfalfa crop is seriously affected by several factors and the highest reduction in seed yield is caused by stink bug infestation. The current study evaluated different insecticides to control stink bugs during 2016-17. The efficacy of ten insecticides, i.e., acephate, dimethoate, malathion, chlorpyriphos, bifenthrin, lambdacyhalothrin, deltamethrin, acetamiprid, imidacloprid and carbosulfan was tested on Agonoscelis spp. (Heteroptera Pentatomidae). The mortality of stink bug was recorded at one, three, five, seven, ten and fifteen days after insecticide application. Similarly, the population of pollinators was recorded before and one, three and five days after the application of insecticides. It was observed that acetamiprid (81.14%) and acephate (80.65%) caused the highest mortality of stink bug and proved most effective. Insecticides application decreased the pollinators' population one day after spray; however, it was rehabilitated three days after insecticide application. Insecticide application increased seed yield from 28.05 kg/acre (during last four year without chemical control) to 116 kg/acre in 2016-17 (with chemical control). It is concluded that acetamiprid and acephate can be successfully used in integrated management program of increasing alfalfa seed production.Entities:
Keywords: Alfalfa; Insecticides; Pollinators; Seed yield; Stink bug
Year: 2021 PMID: 34121887 PMCID: PMC8176121 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Information of insecticides with different mode of action used against stink bug.
| S/No | Insecticides | Formulation | Group | WHO hazard classification | IRAC group | Dose (ml g1− Acre1−) | Mode of Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade Name | Common Name | |||||||
| 1 | Codedor | Acephate | 75SP | Organophosphates | ii | 1B | 400 | Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors |
| 2 | Danadim | Dimethoate | 40EC | Organophosphates | ii | 1B | 400 | Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors |
| 3 | Route | Malathion | 57EC | Organophosphates | iii | 1B | 500 | Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors |
| 4 | Cordelia | Chlorpyriphos | 40EC | Organophosphates | ii | 1B | 500 | Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors |
| 5 | Welthrin | Bifenthrin | 10EC | Pyrethroids | ii | 3A | 300 | Sodium channel modulators |
| 6 | Karate | Lambdacyhalothrin | 2.5EC | Pyrethroids | ii | 3A | 300 | Sodium channel modulators |
| 7 | Deltashine | Deltamethrin | 2.5EC | Pyrethroids | ii | 3A | 400 | Sodium channel modulators |
| 8 | Starlet | Acetamiprid | 20SP | Neonicotinoids | ii | 4A | 125 | Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) competitive modulators |
| 9 | Imidacloprid | Imidacloprid | 20SL | Neonicotinoids | ii | 4A | 250 | Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) competitive modulators |
| 10 | Advantage | Carbosulfan | 20EC | Carbamates | ii | 1A | 500 | Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors |
Comparison of percent mortality of stink bug after spray on alfalfa crop during 2016–17.
| S. No | Insecticides | Pop. of stink bug B. spray | Dose (ml g 1− 100liter1− solution) | Mortality rate of Stink Bug after spray | Avg mortality | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade Name | Common Name | One day | Three days | Five days | Seven days | Ten Days | Fifteen days | ||||
| 1 | Codedor 75SP | acephate | 5.61 | 400 | 69.23 ± 1.04c | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 84.61 ± 1.93a | 68.56 ± 1.36b | 61.54 ± 1.87a | 80.65 |
| 2 | Danadim 40EC | dimethoate | 4.67 | 400 | 78.57 ± 1.28bc | 50.00 ± 0.78c | 28.57 ± 0.95d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 26.19 |
| 3 | Route 57EC | malathion | 6.21 | 500 | 52.63 ± 0.82d | 47.37 ± 0.96 cd | 31.58 ± 0.71d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 21.93 |
| 4 | Cordelia 40EC | chlorpyrifos | 7.67 | 500 | 73.91 ± 1.12bc | 42.61 ± 0.88d | 29.87 ± 0.76d | 15.22 ± 1.15c | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 26.93 |
| 5 | Welthrin 10EC | bifenthrin | 4.33 | 300 | 84.62 ± 2.76ab | 23.21 ± 1.19e | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 17.97 |
| 6 | Karate 2.5EC | lambdacyhalothrin | 5.19 | 300 | 70.00 ± 1.40c | 29.55 ± 0.98e | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 16.59 |
| 7 | Deltashine 2.5EC | deltamethrin | 4.17 | 400 | 80.00 ± 0.92bc | 44.12 ± 0.82 cd | 30.00 ± 1.40d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 25.68 |
| 8 | Starlet 20SP | acetamiprid | 5.67 | 125 | 72.73 ± 2.21bc | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 82.76 ± 1.14b | 81.82 ± 1.39a | 81.82 ± 1.46a | 67.73 ± 1.81a | 81.14 |
| 9 | Imidacloprid 20SL | imidacloprid | 4.96 | 250 | 80.00 ± 0.83bc | 80.00 ± 0.94b | 30.00 ± 1.12d | 11.29 ± 0.38c | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 33.54 |
| 10 | Advantage 20EC | carbosulfan | 7.67 | 500 | 95.65 ± 0.49a | 75.46 ± 0.73b | 52.61 ± 0.81c | 33.91 ± 1.36b | 7.22 ± 0.27c | 1.26 ± 0.10b | 44.35 |
| 11 | Control | 5.26 | – | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 2.01 ± 0.04f | 0.00 ± 0.02e | 0.00 ± 0.00 d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 2.01 | |
| Tukey’s HSD 5 | 12.78 | 7.06 | 7.48 | 8.37 | 5.64 | 7.27 | |||||
| F-Value | 101.57 | 518.80 | 491.97 | 397.47 | 753.44 | 336.48 | |||||
Different letter within column indicate significant differences (p < 0.5) among treatments (n = 3).
Fig. 1Cumulative percent mortality of stink bug in alfalfa seed crop.
Fig. 2Effect of different pesticides on population of pollinators before and after spray.
Fig. 3Comparison of alfalfa seed production in 2016–17 with last four years yield at FRI-Sargodha.