| Literature DB >> 34121880 |
Muhammad Afzal1, Imran Kazmi2,3, Anwarulabedin Mohsin Quazi1, Aftab Ahmad4, Fahad A Al-Abaasi2, Faisal Imam5, Khalid Saad Alharbi1, Sami I Alzarea1, Ameeduzzafar Zafar6.
Abstract
The 6-shogaol, is a flavanone type flavonoid that is abundant in citrus fruit and has a wide range of pharmacological effects. The present study attempted to evaluate the antiurolithic effect of 6-shogaol on ethylene glycol (EG) and ammonium chloride (AC)-induced experimental urolithiasis in rats. The efficacy of 6-shogaol 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg was studied in EG 0.75% (V/V) and AC 1% (W/V) experimentally induced urolithiasis in rats for 21 days. The weight difference, urine volume, the levels of calcium, phosphate, magnesium, oxalate and uric acid in urine was observed. The blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid in serum and levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) were also measured. Histopathological analyses in kidneys were also performed. The rats weights were higher in the 6-shogaol groups than the urolithiasis group. EG caused a significant increase in serum creatinine (p < 0.05), BUN (P < 0.001), and uric acid (p < 0.01) while treatment with Cystone (750 mg/kg), and 6-shogaol (50 and 100 mg/kg) showed the significant reduction in increased serum levels of creatinine (p < 0.001), uric acid (p < 0.01) and BUN (p < 0.001). Administration of EG and AC showed statistically significant (p < 0.001) elevated levels of MDA and reduction in GSH levels. Treatment of Cystone (750 mg/kg), and 6-shogaol (50 and 100 mg/kg) significantly (p < 0.001) reduced MDA levels and an increase GSH levels as compared to EG and AC-treated group. The histological findings further attested antiurolithiatic properties of 6-shogaol. The present study attributed clinical shreds of evidence first time that claiming the significant antiurolithic effect of 6-shogaol and could be a cost-effective candidate for the prevention and treatment of urolithiasis.Entities:
Keywords: 6-Shogaol; Calcium oxalate; Ethylene glycol; Urolithiasis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34121880 PMCID: PMC8176042 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Effect of 6-shogaol on relative body weight in ethylene glycol and ammonium chloride-induced urolithiasis rats.
| 115.1 ± 3.5 | 100.3 ± 2.5 | 100.3 ± 2.5 | 100.5 ± 6.5 | 109.2 ± 2.8 | |
| 122.2 ± 4.5 | 100.1 ± 5.5#a | 120.2 ± 4.0**b | 116.3 ± 1.9**b | 122.2 ± 4.5**b | |
| 148.2 ± 6.5 | 108.4 ± 3.9##a | 143.2 ± 5.5***b | 130.3 ± 2.5**b | 140.7 ± 4.1***b |
Values given are ±SEM for (n = 6), #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001vs. week 1 of respective groups; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 avs Normal group, bvs as compared to ethylene glycol (EG) and ammonium chloride (AC) control group.
Effect of 6-shogol on urinary parameters in ethylene glycol and ammonium chloride-induced urolithiasis rats.
| 1.82 ± 0.15 | 5.70 ± 0.59# | 2.37 ± 0.43*** | 3.15 ± 0.43** | 2.87 ± 0.45** | |
| 5.54 ± 0.50 | 26.81 ± 1.06# | 6.04 ± 0.77*** | 11.50 ± 0.95** | 7.71 ± 1.19*** | |
| 6.52 ± 0.03 | 9.88 ± 0.22### | 6.88 ± 0.16*** | 7.39 ± 0.18* | 6.95 ± 0.20*** | |
| 4.88 ± 0.03 | 1.91 ± 0.20### | 3.70 ± 0.15*** | 2.93 ± 0.10 | 3.85 ± 0.29*** | |
| 2.75 ± 0.06 | 6.83 ± 0.12### | 2.84 ± 0.03*** | 5.38 ± 0.49* | 3.61 ± 0.26** | |
| 1.32 ± 0.04 | 5.50 ± 0.03### | 1.49 ± 0.02*** | 3.06 ± 0.39** | 2.51 ± 0.24*** | |
| 5.64 ± 0.11 | 9.24 ± 0.19### | 5.80 ± 0.06*** | 7.71 ± 0.35* | 5.99 ± 0.17*** | |
| 0.27 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.17# | 0.54 ± 0.02*** | 1.43 ± 0.21* | 1.02 ± 0.14*** |
Values given are ±SEM for (n = 6), one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test ### p < 0.001 as compared to normal group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.as compared to ethylene glycol (EG) and ammonium chloride (AC) control group.
Effect of 6-shogol on serum blood parameters in ethylene glycol and ammonium chloride-induced urolithiasis rats.
| 0.82 ± 0.01 | 1.40 ± 0.02## | 0.90 ± 0.06*** | 1.00 ± 0.01* | 0.95 ± 0.01*** | |
| 34.8 ± 1.27 | 60.1 ± 0.53### | 36.8 ± 1.05*** | 40.93 ± 0.60** | 38.75 ± 0.49*** | |
| 1.85 ± 0.02 | 3.32 ± 0.06# | 2.34 ± 0.03*** | 3.88 ± 0.49* | 3.513 ± 0.36** | |
| 0.58 ± 0.12 | 4.78 ± 0.12#### | 1.01 ± 0.13*** | 3.5 ± 0.13* | 2.5 ± 0.12** | |
| 8.30 ± 0.90 | 5.50 ± 1.05### | 8.01 ± 1.00 | 6.50 ± 0.80** | 7.30 ± 0.80 |
Values given are ±SEM for (n = 6), one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test ### p < 0.001 compared to normal *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. as compared to ethylene glycol (EG) and ammonium chloride (AC) control group.
Fig. 1Kidney Histopathology: A) Normal Control group, B) Ethylene Glycol control group, C) Cystone 750 mg/kg treated group, D) 6-shogaol 50 mg/kg, E) 6-shogaol 100 mg/kg treated group, Circular sections indicate CaOx crystal depositions in respective sections.