Literature DB >> 34121419

Pulseless Electrical Activity as the Initial Cardiac Arrest Rhythm: Importance of Preexisting Left Ventricular Function.

Daniel I Ambinder1, Kaustubha D Patil1, Hikmet Kadioglu1, Pace S Wetstein1, Richard S Tunin1, Sarah J Fink1, Susumu Tao1, Giulio Agnetti1,2, Henry R Halperin1,3.   

Abstract

Background Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is a common initial rhythm in cardiac arrest. A substantial number of PEA arrests are caused by coronary ischemia in the setting of acute coronary occlusion, but the underlying mechanism is not well understood. We hypothesized that the initial rhythm in patients with acute coronary occlusion is more likely to be PEA than ventricular fibrillation in those with prearrest severe left ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Results We studied the initial cardiac arrest rhythm induced by acute left anterior descending coronary occlusion in swine without and with preexisting severe left ventricular dysfunction induced by prior infarcts in non-left anterior descending coronary territories. Balloon occlusion resulted in ventricular fibrillation in 18 of 34 naïve animals, occurring 23.5±9.0 minutes following occlusion, and PEA in 1 animal. However, all 18 animals with severe prearrest left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 15±5%) developed PEA 1.7±1.1 minutes after occlusion. Conclusions Acute coronary ischemia in the setting of severe left ventricular dysfunction produces PEA because of acute pump failure, which occurs almost immediately after coronary occlusion. After the onset of coronary ischemia, PEA occurred significantly earlier than ventricular fibrillation (<2 minutes versus 20 minutes). These findings support the notion that patients with baseline left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease who develop PEA should be evaluated for acute coronary occlusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction; cardiac arrest; pulseless electrical activity; resuscitation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34121419     DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.018671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


  1 in total

1.  Is there anything else to fish out of this "fishy" electrocardiogram?

Authors:  A Y Andreou
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.380

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.