Irina Pokhilenko1, Luca M M Janssen2, Silvia M A A Evers2,3, Ruben M W A Drost2, Lena Schnitzler2,4, Aggie T G Paulus2,5. 1. Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. i.pokhilenko@maastrichtuniversity.nl. 2. Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Centre for Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 5. Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychosocial (e.g., anxiety or behavior) problems lead to costs not only in the healthcare sector but also in education and other sectors. As psychosocial problems develop during the critical period of establishing educational trajectories, education costs are particularly relevant in the context of psychosocial problems among children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to gain insights into the methods used for the inclusion of education costs in health economics studies and into the proportion of the education costs in relation to the total costs associated with a condition or an intervention. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, SSCI, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Econlit databases in August 2019 for economic evaluations of mental health, psychosocial and educational interventions, and cost-of-illness studies of mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders conducted from a societal perspective in populations of children and adolescents. An additional search was conducted in February 2021 to update the review. RESULTS: In total, 49 articles were included in the analysis. The most common cost items were special education, school absenteeism, and various educational professionals (educational psychologist). A variety of methods were employed for the identification, measurement, and/or valuation of education costs. The proportion of education costs to the total costs of condition/intervention ranged from 0 to 67%, with the mean being 18.5%. DISCUSSION: Since education costs can constitute a significant proportion of the total costs of an intervention or condition, including them in health economics studies might be important in informing optimal resource allocation decisions. Although various methods are available for including education costs in health economics studies, further research is needed to develop evidence-based methods for producing comparable estimates.
BACKGROUND: Psychosocial (e.g., anxiety or behavior) problems lead to costs not only in the healthcare sector but also in education and other sectors. As psychosocial problems develop during the critical period of establishing educational trajectories, education costs are particularly relevant in the context of psychosocial problems among children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to gain insights into the methods used for the inclusion of education costs in health economics studies and into the proportion of the education costs in relation to the total costs associated with a condition or an intervention. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, SSCI, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Econlit databases in August 2019 for economic evaluations of mental health, psychosocial and educational interventions, and cost-of-illness studies of mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders conducted from a societal perspective in populations of children and adolescents. An additional search was conducted in February 2021 to update the review. RESULTS: In total, 49 articles were included in the analysis. The most common cost items were special education, school absenteeism, and various educational professionals (educational psychologist). A variety of methods were employed for the identification, measurement, and/or valuation of education costs. The proportion of education costs to the total costs of condition/intervention ranged from 0 to 67%, with the mean being 18.5%. DISCUSSION: Since education costs can constitute a significant proportion of the total costs of an intervention or condition, including them in health economics studies might be important in informing optimal resource allocation decisions. Although various methods are available for including education costs in health economics studies, further research is needed to develop evidence-based methods for producing comparable estimates.
Authors: Denise H M Bodden; Carmen D Dirksen; Susan M Bögels; Maaike H Nauta; Else De Haan; Jaap Ringrose; Carla Appelboom; Andries G Brinkman; Karen C M M J Appelboom-Geerts Journal: Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.544
Authors: L Hakkaart-van Roijen; B W C Zwirs; C Bouwmans; S S Tan; T W J Schulpen; L Vlasveld; J K Buitelaar Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Marisa Elena Domino; Barbara J Burns; Susan G Silva; Christopher J Kratochvil; Benedetto Vitiello; Mark A Reinecke; Jeremy Mario; John S March Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sarah Byford; Maria Cary; Barbara Barrett; Catherine R Aldred; Tony Charman; Patricia Howlin; Kristelle Hudry; Kathy Leadbitter; Ann Le Couteur; Helen McConachie; Andrew Pickles; Vicky Slonims; Kathryn J Temple; Jonathan Green Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Cathy Creswell; Mara Violato; Susan Cruddace; Stephen Gerry; Lynne Murray; Roz Shafran; Alan Stein; Lucy Willetts; Emma McIntosh; Peter J Cooper Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 8.982