Literature DB >> 34121139

Longitudinal, Long-Term Comparison of Single- versus Multipoint Upper Limb Circumference Periodical Measurements as a Tool to Predict Persistent Lymphedema in Women Treated Surgically for Breast Cancer: An Optimized Strategy to Early Diagnose Lymphedema and Avoid Permanent Sequelae in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Cintia Furlan1,2, Carolina Nascimben Matheus3, Rodrigo Menezes Jales4, Sophie F M Derchain1,2, João Renato Bennini1,2, Luís Otavio Sarian5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aim to evaluate whether upper limb (UL) circumference (ULC) and UL swelling sensation (ULSS) performed shortly after surgery or later on during follow-up can predict long-term/persistent forms of lymphedema in women who underwent surgery for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five women completed at least 24 months of follow-up. At each follow-up visit (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery), patients were tested for lymphedema using ULC and ULSS. Two different approaches to ULC were compared: (1) a "positive" lymphedema diagnosis if a difference ≥ 2 cm between the affected and contralateral UL was detected in at least two contiguous measurement points (MPs) and (2) a "positive" result if just one MP ≥ 2 cm. Patients were also questioned about their perception of weight, swelling, and/or tension (ULSS). The gold standard for long-term lymphedema was a water displacement difference between the UL ≥ 200 mL 24 months after surgery (ULWD).
RESULTS: Twenty-four months after surgery, 19 (22.4%) women were diagnosed with long-term lymphedema. Using 24-month data, comparison of log-likelihoods denoted a clear superiority of the ULC approach 1 compared with 2 for the diagnosis of long-term lymphedema (p < 0.001). Using approach 1, the best prediction of a woman developing long-term lymphedema if she had a positive ULC in the follow-up was obtained at 6 months after surgery (posterior probability of 60%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that performing ULC 6 months after surgery, regarding as "positive" only women with a difference ≥ 2 cm at two contiguous MPs, is the best strategy to identify women at increased risk of later developing permanent forms of lymphedema.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34121139     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10290-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of interlimb differences of ultrasonographic subcutaneous tissue thickness measurements in breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.

Authors:  E Giray; I Yagci
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 2.  Lymphedema: incidence, pathophysiology, management, and nursing care.

Authors:  C A Humble
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Lymphedema in survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lin He; Huili Qu; Qian Wu; Yuhua Song
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive Measurements of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Harvey N Mayrovitz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.