Emily E Hartwell1,2, Richard Feinn3, Katie Witkiewitz4, Timothy Pond1,2, Henry R Kranzler1,2. 1. Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA. 4. Department of Psychology (KW), Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although abstinence has traditionally been considered the only suitable outcome for alcohol treatment, reduced drinking is also associated with improved functioning and medical and psychiatric outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking levels (RDLs) have been shown to be valid outcome measures in treatment trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of two 12-week, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which a total of 308 individuals with problematic alcohol use received topiramate or placebo treatment. We compared the utility of the WHO RDLs with other treatment outcomes, including self-reported measures of alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and quality of life, and the biomarker gamma-glutamyltransferase. RESULTS: Topiramate treatment was associated with small effect sizes for both a 1-level (d = 0.26) and a 2-level (d = 0.19) reduction in WHO RDL, effects that were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. No heavy drinking days, one of the outcome measures recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for alcohol medication registration trials, also exhibited a small effect (0.21), while an effect size for abstinence could not be calculated. There were medium effects of topiramate on continuous measures of percent heavy drinking days (d = 0.49) and alcohol-related problems (d = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate is an efficacious pharmacotherapy for AUD. Although continuous measures of drinking and alcohol-related problems yielded larger effect sizes than the WHO RDLs, the latter nonetheless provide a categorical alternative for use in both clinical care and pharmacotherapy trials.
BACKGROUND: Although abstinence has traditionally been considered the only suitable outcome for alcohol treatment, reduced drinking is also associated with improved functioning and medical and psychiatric outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking levels (RDLs) have been shown to be valid outcome measures in treatment trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of two 12-week, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which a total of 308 individuals with problematic alcohol use received topiramate or placebo treatment. We compared the utility of the WHO RDLs with other treatment outcomes, including self-reported measures of alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and quality of life, and the biomarker gamma-glutamyltransferase. RESULTS: Topiramate treatment was associated with small effect sizes for both a 1-level (d = 0.26) and a 2-level (d = 0.19) reduction in WHO RDL, effects that were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. No heavy drinking days, one of the outcome measures recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for alcohol medication registration trials, also exhibited a small effect (0.21), while an effect size for abstinence could not be calculated. There were medium effects of topiramate on continuous measures of percent heavy drinking days (d = 0.49) and alcohol-related problems (d = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate is an efficacious pharmacotherapy for AUD. Although continuous measures of drinking and alcohol-related problems yielded larger effect sizes than the WHO RDLs, the latter nonetheless provide a categorical alternative for use in both clinical care and pharmacotherapy trials.
Authors: Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Kevin A Hallgren; Stephanie S O'Malley; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Deborah S Hasin; Karl F Mann; Raymond F Anton Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: K M Keyes; M L Hatzenbuehler; K A McLaughlin; B Link; M Olfson; B F Grant; D Hasin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Justin Knox; Jennifer Scodes; Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Karl Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Melanie Wall; Raymond Anton; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Bankole A Johnson; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Charles L Bowden; Carlo C DiClemente; John D Roache; Kevin Lawson; Martin A Javors; Jennie Z Ma Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Friedrich M Wurst; Natasha Thon; Michel Yegles; Alexandra Schrück; Ulrich W Preuss; Wolfgang Weinmann Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Justin Knox; Melanie Wall; Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Daniel Falk; Raye Litten; Karl Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Jennifer Scodes; Raymond Anton; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Henry R Kranzler; Emily E Hartwell; Richard Feinn; Timothy Pond; Katie Witkiewitz; Joel Gelernter; Richard C Crist Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.852