Literature DB >> 34120087

Emotional distress among frontline research staff.

Megan Nguyen1, Lloyd Goldsamt2, Nonhlanhla Mazibuko3, Sanelisiwe Zondo3, Rebecca Fielding-Miller4.   

Abstract

Public health research frequently deals with sensitive topics. A growing body of evidence suggests that frontline researchers who elicit or process participant's traumatic experiences are themselves at risk of developing emotional distress or secondary trauma from daily immersion in these data. This both threatens a study's data quality and calls into question how the harms and benefits of conducting research are distributed across a study team. The objective of this study was to explore how frontline research staff in Eswatini experience and process emotional distress as part of their daily work and to describe potential strategies for resilience and coping using qualitative research methods. We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with informants who had worked in data collection, data entry, and transcription on a number of sensitive topics, including HIV, sex work, and LGBT health. We found that emotional distress is a salient experience among frontline research staff working in Eswatini. This distress stems from conducting research against a generalized backdrop of high rates of HIV, violence, and poverty, particularly since research staff are drawn from affected communities and have their own firsthand knowledge of the phenomena they are studying. Moreover, the qualities study staff are often hired for - empathy, compassion, and emotional intelligence - are also traits that may increase their likelihood of feeling distressed by the narratives they encounter in their work. The workplace can serve as a prism, exacerbating or potentially mitigating these risks into harm at the individual, interpersonal, and community level. While not all study teams may have access to formal mental health services, several informants recommended incorporating regular meetings with a trained counselor as part of the overall project. Others recommended building time for team-building or debriefing conversations into the normal workweek, a strategy that would address both the issue of workload and could bolster the already existent strategy of relying on team members for mental health support.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eswatini; Global health; HIV; Public health; Research ethics; Researcher trauma

Year:  2021        PMID: 34120087     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  2 in total

1.  Predictive Factors of the Burnout Syndrome Occurrence in the Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Simona Grigorescu; Ana-Maria Cazan; Liliana Rogozea; Dan Ovidiu Grigorescu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  'Maybe I Shouldn't Talk': The Role of Power in the Telling of Mental Health Recovery Stories.

Authors:  Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Kristian Pollock; Yasmin Ali; Emma Watson; Donna Franklin; Caroline Yeo; Fiona Ng; Rose McGranahan; Mike Slade; Alison Edgley
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-08-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.