Literature DB >> 3411937

Quantitative analysis of random motility of human microvessel endothelial cells using a linear under-agarose assay.

M A Rupnick1, C L Stokes, S K Williams, D A Lauffenburger.   

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a multistep process intimately involved in embryonic development and subsequent cardiovascular homeostasis and pathology. A major event in the process of angiogenesis is endothelial cell migration. Common in vitro assays (filter, under-agarose, phagokinetic track) used for the evaluation of migration are interpreted by measurements such as leading front distance, total cells migrated, and total area of migration. However, these quantities depend very heavily upon the physical aspects of the assay such as geometry, chemoattractant concentration and diffusivity, and observation time. Thus, while these common cell motility measurements are convenient, they do not represent solely the intrinsic cell response to an attractant. Alternatively, cell motility responses can be described by parameters which do not depend on the physical aspects of the assay system. Such parameters, termed phenomenologic parameters, have been defined for cell migration in a mathematical model derived by others. This model defines two parameters, the random motility coefficient, mu, and the chemotaxis coefficient, chi, which describe the migration responses to uniform concentrations and to gradients of stimulant, respectively. We have used this approach to evaluate the random motility response of human microvessel endothelial cells isolated from omental fat. Human microvessel endothelial cell random motility was measured in uniform concentrations of heparin (10(-3) to 10(3) micrograms/ml) using an under-agarose assay with linear geometry. The value of mu was found to remain constant at 8.2 x 10(-9) cm2/second for all concentrations tested and without heparin. These data indicate that heparin at these concentrations does not significantly stimulate random migration of human microvessel endothelial cell. These results suggest that the potentiating effect of heparin on angiogenesis may not be mediated through a direct affect on endothelial cell migration. Because the random motility coefficient and chemotaxis coefficient are representative of intrinsic cell motility behavior, their use should provide more specific information on endothelial cell migration than other commonly used measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  10 in total

1.  Is tissue augmentation a reality in biosurgery? An experimental study of endothelial cell invasion into tissue filler.

Authors:  Tomaz Velnar; Vladimir Smrkolj; Marjan Slak Rupnik; Lidija Gradisnik
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Microvascular endothelial cell cultures from human omental adipose tissue.

Authors:  A Knedler; R H Eckel; P A Kern; R G Ham
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1989-10

3.  A 3D hybrid model for tissue growth: the interplay between cell population and mass transport dynamics.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Pauline Markenscoff; Kyriacos Zygourakis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis.

Authors:  M A Chaplain
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  A cellular automaton model for the proliferation of migrating contact-inhibited cells.

Authors:  Y Lee; S Kouvroukoglou; L V McIntire; K Zygourakis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Integrin-binding peptide in solution inhibits or enhances endothelial cell migration, predictably from cell adhesion.

Authors:  P Wu; J B Hoying; S K Williams; B A Kozikowski; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Under-Agarose Chemotaxis and Migration Assays for Dictyostelium.

Authors:  Shashi Prakash Singh; Robert H Insall
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  Mathematical models for tumour angiogenesis: numerical simulations and nonlinear wave solutions.

Authors:  H M Byrne; M A Chaplain
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 9.  Improving fluorescence-based assays for the in vitro analysis of cell adhesion and migration.

Authors:  Paola Spessotto; Emiliana Giacomello; Roberto Perri
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Tumor-immune interaction, surgical treatment, and cancer recurrence in a mathematical model of melanoma.

Authors:  Steffen Eikenberry; Craig Thalhauser; Yang Kuang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.