Anja Almén1, Jónína Guðjónsdóttir2, Nils Heimland3, Britta Højgaard4, Hanne Waltenburg4, Anders Widmark5. 1. Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Radiation Protection, Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: anja.almen@med.lu.se. 2. Icelandic Radiation Safety Authority, Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Radiography, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 3. Department of Radiation Protection and Measurement Services, Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Bærum, Norway. 4. Radiation Protection, Danish Health Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Radiation Protection and Measurement Services, Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Bærum, Norway; Department of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To derive Regional Diagnostic Reference Levels (RDRL) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using weight-based DRL curves and compare the outcome with DRL derived using the weight groups. METHODS: Data from 1722 examinations performed at 29 hospitals in four countries were included. DRL was derived for four conventional x-ray (chest, abdomen, pelvis, hips/joints) and two types of CT examinations (thorax, abdomen). DRL curves were derived using an exponential fit to the data using weight as an independent variable and the respective radiation dose indices (PKA, CTDIvol, DLP) as dependent variables. DRL was also derived for weight groups for comparison. The result was compared with national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) curves. RESULTS: The derived curves show similarities with the NDRL curves available and corresponded sufficiently well with DRL for weight groups using the same data set, if sufficient number of data was available. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that weight-based DRL curves are a feasible approach and could be used together with DRL for weight groups. The main advantage of DRL curves is its application in the clinic. When the examination frequency is low, time to collect enough data to establish typical values for one or several weight groups may be unreasonably long. The curve provides the means to compare dose level faster and with fewer data points.
PURPOSE: To derive Regional Diagnostic Reference Levels (RDRL) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using weight-based DRL curves and compare the outcome with DRL derived using the weight groups. METHODS: Data from 1722 examinations performed at 29 hospitals in four countries were included. DRL was derived for four conventional x-ray (chest, abdomen, pelvis, hips/joints) and two types of CT examinations (thorax, abdomen). DRL curves were derived using an exponential fit to the data using weight as an independent variable and the respective radiation dose indices (PKA, CTDIvol, DLP) as dependent variables. DRL was also derived for weight groups for comparison. The result was compared with national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) curves. RESULTS: The derived curves show similarities with the NDRL curves available and corresponded sufficiently well with DRL for weight groups using the same data set, if sufficient number of data was available. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that weight-based DRL curves are a feasible approach and could be used together with DRL for weight groups. The main advantage of DRL curves is its application in the clinic. When the examination frequency is low, time to collect enough data to establish typical values for one or several weight groups may be unreasonably long. The curve provides the means to compare dose level faster and with fewer data points.
Authors: Mark Worrall; Mike Holubinka; Glafkos Havariyoun; Kirsten Hodgson; Sue Edyvean; John Holroyd; Anne Davis; Matthew Dunn; Anna Gardiner Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Denise Bos; Sebastian Zensen; Marcel K Opitz; Johannes Haubold; Kai Nassenstein; Sonja Kinner; Bernd Schweiger; Michael Forsting; Axel Wetter; Nika Guberina Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2022-04-05