Literature DB >> 34118618

Impact of time and phosphorus application rate on phosphorus bioavailability and efficiency of secondary fertilizers recovered from municipal wastewater.

Aleksandra Bogdan1, Ciaran O' Donnell2, Ana Alejandra Robles Aguilar3, Ivona Sigurnjak4, Niamh Power5, Evi Michels6, Joe Harrington7, Erik Meers8.   

Abstract

Demand for phosphorus (P) resources other than non-renewable P rock has driven the development of several P recovery technologies from municipal wastewater treatment and directed recovery of P into valuable fertilizers (struvite, ash, iron phosphate, etc.). Although the bioavailability of novel secondary P fertilizers has been examined in previous studies, insufficient attention has been paid to defining optimal plant growth duration and monitoring conditions to assess the dynamic changes in P. Accordingly, five fertilizers recovered from municipal wastewater: two struvites (STRSL and STRLQ), two ashes (ASH1 and ASH2), and iron-phosphate pelletized sludge (FeP) using triple superphosphate (TSP) as a positive control and blank (zero P) as a negative control, were applied to P poor-sand at three P doses (equivalent to 30, 60, and 90 kg P2O5 ha-1). Fertilizer impact on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) dry matter (DM) and P concentration were evaluated on a monthly basis for seven months. DM and relative agronomical efficiency (RAE) have shown the same trend between the fertilizers, but only at the lowest P dose (corresponding to 30 kg P2O5 ha-1). At higher P doses (60, and 90 kg P2O5 ha-1) the differences in DM and RAE among the fertilizers diminished. STRLQ, STRSL, ASH1 and FeP expressed a rather steady P release pattern, while ASH2 had a delay of four cuts and increase afterward. Monitoring the P uptake during four months of perennial ryegrass growth turned out to be the minimum, and seven months the optimum period for reaching the full capacity of the slow-release P fertilizers.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iron phosphate; Phosphorus availability; Phosphorus recovery; Sewage sludge ash; Struvite

Year:  2021        PMID: 34118618     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  3 in total

1.  Co-fertilization of Sulfur and Struvite-Phosphorus in a Slow-Release Fertilizer Improves Soybean Cultivation.

Authors:  Stella F Valle; Amanda S Giroto; Gelton G F Guimarães; Kerstin A Nagel; Anna Galinski; Jens Cohnen; Nicolai D Jablonowski; Caue Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use: A Flemish illustration.

Authors:  Rahul Ravi; Miriam Beyers; Sander Bruun; Erik Meers
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 13.716

3.  Struvite-based composites for slow-release fertilization: a case study in sand.

Authors:  Stella F Valle; Amanda S Giroto; Vitalij Dombinov; Ana A Robles-Aguilar; Nicolai D Jablonowski; Caue Ribeiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.