Yağmur Kılıç1, Emrah Karataşlıoğlu1, Mehmet Emin Kaval2. 1. Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkey. 2. Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. Electronic address: mehmetkaval@hotmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of root canal preparation size and taper of middle mesial (MM) canals on fracture resistance of mandibular molars. METHODS: Fifty-five mandibular molar teeth having an MM canal were selected based on the cone-beam computed tomographic analysis. After the decoronation and distal root separation procedure, the lengths of the mesial roots were standardized to 13 mm. The specimens were randomly distributed into 5 groups (n = 11). Mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals were prepared up to size 30.06 using VDW.ROTATE rotary files (VDW, Munich, Germany). The MM canal was prepared up to size 25.04, 25.06, 30.04, and 30.06, respectively. No preparation was done in the MM canal in the control group. After the irrigation protocol, the canals were obturated with the single-cone technique. A thin layer of silicone-coated specimens was embedded in acrylic resin and subjected to a fracture strength test by a universal testing machine. A vertical force was applied to the roots until they fracture. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Duncan tests (P = .05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between group 25.04 and the control group, but the fracture strengths of these groups were found to be significantly higher than that of groups 25.06, 30.04, and 30.06 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we concluded that increasing the apical diameter and taper in the MM canal reduces the fracture strength of mandibular molar teeth. Among the tested instrumentation sizes, fracture strength decreased significantly when greater than 25.04 instrumentation sizes were chosen.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of root canal preparation size and taper of middle mesial (MM) canals on fracture resistance of mandibular molars. METHODS: Fifty-five mandibular molar teeth having an MM canal were selected based on the cone-beam computed tomographic analysis. After the decoronation and distal root separation procedure, the lengths of the mesial roots were standardized to 13 mm. The specimens were randomly distributed into 5 groups (n = 11). Mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals were prepared up to size 30.06 using VDW.ROTATE rotary files (VDW, Munich, Germany). The MM canal was prepared up to size 25.04, 25.06, 30.04, and 30.06, respectively. No preparation was done in the MM canal in the control group. After the irrigation protocol, the canals were obturated with the single-cone technique. A thin layer of silicone-coated specimens was embedded in acrylic resin and subjected to a fracture strength test by a universal testing machine. A vertical force was applied to the roots until they fracture. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Duncan tests (P = .05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between group 25.04 and the control group, but the fracture strengths of these groups were found to be significantly higher than that of groups 25.06, 30.04, and 30.06 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we concluded that increasing the apical diameter and taper in the MM canal reduces the fracture strength of mandibular molar teeth. Among the tested instrumentation sizes, fracture strength decreased significantly when greater than 25.04 instrumentation sizes were chosen.