| Literature DB >> 34117939 |
Yan He1, Xiaobo Zhang1, Yongfeng Shi1, Xia Xu1, Liangjian Li1, Jian-Li Wu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heat stress is a major environmental factor that could induce premature leaf senescence in plants. So far, a few rice premature senescent leaf mutants have been reported to involve in heat tolerance.Entities:
Keywords: Heat tolerance; Hydrogen peroxide; IMBR; Rice; Senescence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34117939 PMCID: PMC8197683 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-021-00493-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Identification of PSL50 by IMBR strategy. a Phenotype of WT and psl50 at the mature stage. Scale bar = 20 cm. b Identification of target mutation of psl50 by IMBR strategy. Red dot indicates the causative mutation responsible for the psl50 phenotype. c Initial mapping of PSL50 and verification of target mutation in PSL50. d Deletion and insertion mutation at the target site of 1st exon in three representative knockout lines generated by CRISPR/Cas9 in ‘Kitaake’ background. The Cas9–2, Cas9–5 and Cas9–12 lines are homozygous mutants carrying a 1-bp deletion, a 2-bp deletion and a 1-bp insertion on both homochromosomes, respectively. e Phenotype of three representative T0 knockout lines at the heading stage. Insets display magnified views of flag leaves. Empty vector represents transgenic Kitaake plant transformed with CRISPR/Cas9 empty vector. Scale bar = 20 cm
Nucleotide comparison of target mutation site between psl50 and the other three mutants
| Material | Position | Genotype | Mutant depth | Mutant allele depth | Mutation type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28,281,174 | G | 10 | 10,0 | GC to G (frameshift) | |
| 28,281,174 | GC | 14 | 14,0 | GC (wild-type) | |
| 28,281,174 | GC | 18 | 18,0 | GC (wild-type) | |
| 28,281,174 | GC | 24 | 24,0 | GC (wild-type) | |
| MH63 | 28,281,174 | GC | GC |
Fig. 2Effects of heat stress on psl50 and WT at the seedling stage. a Phenotypes of WT and psl50 seedlings under heat stress. Seedlings were hydroponically (upper row) or soil grown (lower row) at 26 °C for 12 d and then treated at 45 °C for 50 h or 40 h followed a recovery at 26 °C. Scale bars = 5 cm. b DAB staining for H2O2 accumulation detection and trypan blue staining for cell death detection in the top 2nd leaves of hydroponical seedlings before and after heat treatment. c Survival rate of hydroponic WT and psl50 seedlings shown in a. d-f H2O2 content, ion leakage rate and MDA content in hydroponic WT and psl50 seedlings before and after heat treatment. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant difference by Student’s t test (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Subcellular localization and expression analysis of PSL50. a GFP signals in rice protoplasts. NST1-mCherry was used as a rice protoplast Golgi-tagged marker. b PSL50 expression in different parts of a flag leaf. Different letters indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test (P < 0.05). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). c Relative expression levels of PSL50 in various organs at different growth stages. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). d Expression analysis of PSL50 in hydroponic WT and psl50 seedlings under heat stress conditions. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). e Expression analysis of ROS scavenging system-related genes in hydroponic WT and psl50 seedlings at 26 °C (upper) and 45 °C (lower) for 12 h. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Rice UBIQUITIN (LOC_Os03g13170) was used as an internal control. f Levels of thylakoid membrane proteins detected in total proteins from top second leaves of 12 d WT and psl50 hydroponic seedlings at 26 °C and 45 °C for 50 h. Image J was used for the quantification of immunoblot results and these experiments were repeated at least twice with similar results. g Leaf chlorophyll content of hydroponic WT and psl50 seedlings before and after heat treatment. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). h-j Changes of photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ) and relative PSII electron transport rate (ETR) in WT and psl50 under heat treatment. The data for heat treatment in g-h were collected after a 7-d recovery at 26 °C. Seedlings were hydroponically grown at 26 °C for 12 d and then treated at 45 °C for 50 h following a 7-d recovery at 26 °C. CK, normal growth condition at 26 °C; HT, heat treatment at 45 °C followed by recovery at 26 °C for 7 d. Data are means ± SD (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant difference by Student’s t test (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05)