Literature DB >> 34117909

Disparate genetic variants associated with distinct components of cowpea resistance to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.

Frank J Messina1, Alexandra M Lish1, Zachariah Gompert2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Polygenic genome-wide association mapping identified two regions of the cowpea genome associated with different components of resistance to its major post-harvest pest, the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) is an important grain and fodder crop in arid and semi-arid regions of Africa, Asia, and South America, where the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus, is a serious post-harvest pest. Development of cultivars resistant to C. maculatus population growth in storage could increase grain yield and quality and reduce reliance on insecticides. Here, we use a MAGIC (multi-parent, advanced-generation intercross) population of cowpea consisting of 305 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) to identify genetic variants associated with resistance to seed beetles. Because inferences regarding the genetic basis of resistance may depend on the source of the pest or the assay protocol, we used two divergent geographic populations of C. maculatus and two complementary assays to measure several aspects of resistance. Using polygenic genome-wide association mapping models, we found that the cowpea RILs harbor substantial additive-genetic variation for most resistance measures. Variation in several components of resistance, including larval development time and survival, was largely explained by one or several linked loci on chromosome 5. A second region on chromosome 8 explained increased seed resistance via the induction of early-exiting larvae. Neither of these regions contained genes previously associated with resistance to insects that infest grain legumes. We found some evidence of gene-gene interactions affecting resistance, but epistasis did not contribute substantially to resistance variation in this mapping population. The combination of mostly high heritabilities and a relatively consistent and simple genetic architecture increases the feasibility of breeding for enhanced resistance to C. maculatus.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34117909     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03856-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  33 in total

Review 1.  The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) in defense against pathogenic fungi.

Authors:  G De Lorenzo; R D'Ovidio; F Cervone
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.078

2.  Temperature-specific outcomes of cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions on egg-to-adult development time in seed beetles.

Authors:  Damian K Dowling; Katia Chávez Abiega; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Strategies for Enhanced Crop Resistance to Insect Pests.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 4.  Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) in plant defence: a structural view.

Authors:  Adele Di Matteo; Daniele Bonivento; Demetrius Tsernoglou; Luca Federici; Felice Cervone
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Evolutionary genetics of lifespan and mortality rates in two populations of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  C W Fox; M L Bush; D A Roff; W G Wallin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Variation in responses to susceptible and resistant cowpeas among West African populations of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).

Authors:  J H Appleby; P F Credland
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  A gene encoding a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) is a candidate gene for bruchid (Coleoptera: bruchidae) resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata).

Authors:  Sathaporn Chotechung; Prakit Somta; Jinbing Chen; Tarika Yimram; Xin Chen; Peerasak Srinives
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Baubles, bangles, and biotypes: a critical review of the use and abuse of the biotype concept.

Authors:  D A Downie
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Detecting epistasis with the marginal epistasis test in genetic mapping studies of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Lorin Crawford; Ping Zeng; Sayan Mukherjee; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A comparative approach to testing hypotheses for the evolution of sex-biased dispersal in bean beetles.

Authors:  Michelle H Downey; Rebecca Searle; Sunil Bellur; Adam Geiger; Brian S Maitner; Johanna R Ohm; Midori Tuda; Tom E X Miller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  Additive genetic effects in interacting species jointly determine the outcome of caterpillar herbivory.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; Tara Saley; Casey Philbin; Su'ad A Yoon; Eva Perry; Michelle E Sneck; Joshua G Harrison; C Alex Buerkle; James A Fordyce; Chris C Nice; Craig D Dodson; Sarah L Lebeis; Lauren K Lucas; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 2.  Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review.

Authors:  Younis Ahmad Hajam; Rajesh Kumar
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.