Literature DB >> 34117621

Is a treat-to-target approach to lipid-lowering therapy appropriate in patients with chronic kidney disease? A prospective French cohort study.

Ziad A Massy1,2,3,4, Sophie Liabeuf5,6, Epiphane Kolla7, Jean Ferrières8,9, Eric Bruckert10, Oriane Lambert7, Nicolas Mansencal11, Maurice Laville12, Luc Frimat13,14, Denis Fouque15, Christian Combe16,17, Roberto Pecoits-Filho18,19, Bénédicte Stengel7,20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whereas European guidelines recommend adjusting lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) to meet prespecified targets ('treat-to-target') for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), other guidelines do not ('fire and forget'). In a large observational prospective cohort, we sought to evaluate which strategy could be associated with better cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS: In CKD-REIN, patients (CKD stages 3 and 4) on LLT were categorized according to achievement of LDL-C targets for high and very high cardiovascular risk (< 2.6 and < 1.8 mmol/L, respectively) at baseline. Primary outcome was fatal/non-fatal atheromatous cardiovascular disease (CVD). Secondary outcomes were non-atheromatous CVD, atheromatous or non-atheromatous CVD, and major adverse cardiovascular events.
RESULTS: The population comprised 1521 patients (68 ± 12 years, 31% women, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 35 mL/min/1.73 m2). Overall, 523 (34%) met their LDL-C targets at baseline. Median follow-up was 2.9 years (interquartile range 2.2-3.0). Incidence rates per 100 patient-years were 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-7.0) for atheromatous CVD, 9.2% (8.3-10.1) for non-atheromatous CVD, 15.2% (14.0-16.4) for atheromatous/non-atheromatous CVD, and 6.3% (5.5-7.1) for major adverse cardiovascular events. Corresponding rates in patients who achieved targets were 6.6%, 9.8%, 16.1%, and 6.3%, respectively. Target achievement was not associated with risk of fatal/non-fatal atheromatous CVD (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.76-1.44, p = 0.77) or fatal/non-fatal atheromatous or non-atheromatous CVD (0.98, 0.78-1.23, p = 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not appear to support a treat-to-target approach in CKD patients on LLT, and may favor the hypothesis of an advantage of fire-and-forget. Randomized trials are needed to confirm this theory.
© 2021. Italian Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Chronic kidney disease; Lipid-lowering drugs; Lipids; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34117621     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01086-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  2 in total

1.  2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; Neil J Stone; Alison L Bailey; Craig Beam; Kim K Birtcher; Roger S Blumenthal; Lynne T Braun; Sarah de Ferranti; Joseph Faiella-Tommasino; Daniel E Forman; Ronald Goldberg; Paul A Heidenreich; Mark A Hlatky; Daniel W Jones; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Nuria Lopez-Pajares; Chiadi E Ndumele; Carl E Orringer; Carmen A Peralta; Joseph J Saseen; Sidney C Smith; Laurence Sperling; Salim S Virani; Joseph Yeboah
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Lipid disorders in patients with renal failure: Role in cardiovascular events and progression of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Luca Visconti; Salvatore Benvenga; Antonio Lacquaniti; Valeria Cernaro; Annamaria Bruzzese; Giovanni Conti; Michele Buemi; Domenico Santoro
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.