Carlo Ronsini1, Luigi Pedone Anchora2, Stefano Restaino3, Camilla Fedele1, Damiano Arciuolo4, Elena Teodorico2, Nicolò Bizzarri2, Gian Franco Zannoni5, Gabriella Ferrandina1, Giovanni Scambia6, Francesco Fanfani1. 1. Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, A. Gemelli, IRCCS, University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. 2. Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, A. Gemelli, IRCCS, University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy. 3. Gynecoloy and Obstetrics Department, ASUFC University-Hospital of Central Friuli, ASUFC, Udine, Italy. 4. Unit of Gyneco-Pathology and Breast Pathology, Department of Women's Health, Childhood and Public Health Sciences, A. Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy. 5. Unit of Gyneco-Pathology and Breast Pathology, Department of Women's Health, Childhood and Public Health Sciences, A. Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy; Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. 6. Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, A. Gemelli, IRCCS, University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.scambia@policlinicogemelli.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lymph vascular space involvement (LVSI) is one of the most important prognostic factors in early stage cervical cancer. Its qualitative evaluation represents a milestone for patient risk stratification and treatment choice, but a semi-quantitative analysis of LVSI may offer a more truthful risk model, as already demonstrated for endometrial cancer. The present study aims to investigate the performances of a semi-quantitative evaluation of LVSI in terms of patient risk assessment. METHODS: In this retrospective study were enrolled patients underwent surgical treatment for early cervical cancer from January 2009 to October 2018. A semi-quantitative evaluation such as the "three-tiered approach" was used to classify the LVSI pathway: negative vs. focal vs. diffuse. RESULTS: Diffuse LVSI was found to be a risk factor for lymph node metastasis (OR: 9.844, p < 0.001), and parametrial involvement (OR: 5.566, p < 0.001). Lymph nodal recurrences were more frequent in diffuse LVSI group (LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.369; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.002; Focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.214); and so distant recurrences (LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.623; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.002; Focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.026). Patients with diffuse LVSI showed a worse disease-free survival (DFS) than patients with focal or absent involvement (DFS LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.938; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p < 0.001; focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative evaluation of LVSI may be useful to identify risk patients for shorter disease-free survival and lymphatic and distant recurrences in patients with early stage.
OBJECTIVE: Lymph vascular space involvement (LVSI) is one of the most important prognostic factors in early stage cervical cancer. Its qualitative evaluation represents a milestone for patient risk stratification and treatment choice, but a semi-quantitative analysis of LVSI may offer a more truthful risk model, as already demonstrated for endometrial cancer. The present study aims to investigate the performances of a semi-quantitative evaluation of LVSI in terms of patient risk assessment. METHODS: In this retrospective study were enrolled patients underwent surgical treatment for early cervical cancer from January 2009 to October 2018. A semi-quantitative evaluation such as the "three-tiered approach" was used to classify the LVSI pathway: negative vs. focal vs. diffuse. RESULTS: Diffuse LVSI was found to be a risk factor for lymph node metastasis (OR: 9.844, p < 0.001), and parametrial involvement (OR: 5.566, p < 0.001). Lymph nodal recurrences were more frequent in diffuse LVSI group (LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.369; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.002; Focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.214); and so distant recurrences (LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.623; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.002; Focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.026). Patients with diffuse LVSI showed a worse disease-free survival (DFS) than patients with focal or absent involvement (DFS LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.938; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p < 0.001; focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative evaluation of LVSI may be useful to identify risk patients for shorter disease-free survival and lymphatic and distant recurrences in patients with early stage.
Authors: Carlo Ronsini; Maria Cristina Solazzo; Nicolò Bizzarri; Domenico Ambrosio; Marco La Verde; Marco Torella; Raffaela Maria Carotenuto; Luigi Cobellis; Nicola Colacurci; Pasquale De Franciscis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 4.339