| Literature DB >> 34116674 |
Yuze Zhang1, Xiaoyan Lin2, Yong Chu1, Xiaoming Chen3, Heng Du1, Hailin Zhang1, Changsheng Xu1, Hong Xie1, Qinyun Ruan2, Jinxiu Lin1, Jie Liu4, Jinzhang Zeng4, Ke Ma5, Dajun Chai6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac remodeling is one of the major risk factors for heart failure. In patients with type 2 diabetes, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of the first hospitalization for heart failure, possibly through glucose-independent mechanisms in part, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. This study aimed to shed light on the efficacy of dapagliflozin in reducing cardiac remodeling and potential mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Angiotensin II; Cardiac fibrotic remodeling; Dapagliflozin; Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; TGFβ1/Smad signaling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34116674 PMCID: PMC8196449 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-021-01312-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Serum and biochemical indicators of Ang II rats treated with vehicle or DAPA for 4 weeks
| CTL | CTL + DAPA | Ang II | Ang II + DAPA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glu (mM) | 8.29 ± 1.29 | 8.33 ± 1.28 | 8.09 ± 1.12 | 8.05 ± 1.17 |
| INS (pg/ml) | 223 ± 38.94 | 224.53 ± 66.16 | 205.95 ± 49.33 | 215.59 ± 43.51 |
| TC (mM) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.37 | 1.98 ± 0.48 | 1.85 ± 0.27 |
| TG (mM) | 1.14 ± 0.49 | 1.08 ± 0.46 | 1.31 ± 0.46 | 1.22 ± 0.56 |
| LDL-C (mM) | 0.35 ± 0.1 | 0.36 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | 0.38 ± 0.07 |
| HDL-C (mM) | 0.53 ± 0.16 | 0.57 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.19 | 0.59 ± 0.1 |
| ALT (U/I) | 53.67 ± 8.59 | 61 ± 14.3 | 59.5 ± 7.61 | 52.33 ± 6.62 |
| AST (U/I) | 244.09 ± 10.05 | 246.16 ± 38.39 | 229.17 ± 17.41 | 236 ± 12.18 |
| CK (U/I) | 331.14 ± 11.81 | 327.08 ± 15.24 | 317.88 ± 18.12 | 321.81 ± 15.85 |
| CK-MB (U/I) | 338.28 ± 13.79 | 337.41 ± 15.76 | 318.38 ± 20.62 | 326.69 ± 16.81 |
| LDH (U/I) | 360.22 ± 13.26 | 359.74 ± 13.15 | 340.61 ± 24.75 | 354.96 ± 14.97 |
| BUN (mM) | 6.61 ± 1.43 | 6.88 ± 1.76 | 7.84 ± 2.13 | 8.64 ± 2.05 |
| SCr (μmol/l) | 18.12 ± 3.32 | 19.72 ± 2.89 | 20.05 ± 4.59 | 18.48 ± 2.59 |
| UA (μmol/l) | 11.3 ± 7.12 | 13.38 ± 5.86 | 8.22 ± 3.5 | 7.57 ± 3.95 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group)
Every parameter showed no significant difference among the four groups. Data are not significant for each group
Glu glucose, INS insulin, TC total serum cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL low-density lipoprotein, HDL high-density lipoprotein, SCr serum creatinine, ALT serum alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, CK creatine kinase
Physical and conventional echocardiographic parameters in normal and Ang II-infused rats treated with vehicle or DAPA
| Parameters | CTL | CTL + DAPA | Ang II | Ang II + DAPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 362.17 ± 12.67 | 358 ± 9.93 | 320.33 ± 15.31* | 318.5 ± 12.29* |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.95 ± 13.49 | 134.4 ± 16.43 | 228.28 ± 14.62* | 222.67 ± 19.34* |
| DBP (mmHg) | 102.6 ± 16.62 | 106.77 ± 11.2 | 190.02 ± 18.49* | 173.1 ± 17.58* |
| HW (g) | 1.0 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 1.33 ± 0.05* | 1.14 ± 0.1*† |
| LVW (g) | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.08 | 1.0 ± 0.03* | 0.85 ± 0.07*† |
| IVSd (mm) | 1.83 ± 0.08 | 1.82 ± 0.06 | 2.5 ± 0.14* | 1.85 ± 0.09† |
| LVEDd (mm) | 7.45 ± 0.65 | 7.49 ± 0.19 | 6.28 ± 0.42* | 7.06 ± 0.71† |
| LVEDs (mm) | 4.49 ± 0.26 | 4.37 ± 0.23 | 3.37 ± 0.23* | 4.0 ± 0.5*† |
| LVPWd (mm) | 1.68 ± 0.1 | 1.74 ± 0.13 | 2.32 ± 0.13* | 1.73 ± 0.12† |
| LVEDV (ml) | 0.94 ± 0.22 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.1* | 0.81 ± 0.24† |
| LVESV (ml) | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02* | 0.17 ± 0.07*† |
| LVEF (%) | 75.47 ± 3.21 | 78.02 ± 2.57 | 82.88 ± 0.79* | 79.9 ± 1.99*† |
| LVFS (%) | 39.51 ± 2.83 | 40.61 ± 1.41 | 46.32 ± 0.85* | 43.46 ± 1.79*† |
| HR | 389.48 ± 21.59 | 377.53 ± 17.21 | 409.01 ± 26.04 | 409.32 ± 21.06 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group)
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD
BW body weight, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HW heart weight, LVW left ventricle weight, TL tibia length, IVSd end-diastole interventricular septum thickness, LVEDd left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, LVEDs left ventricular end-systolic dimension, LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESV left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVPWd diastolic left ventricular posterior wall thickness, LVFS left ventricular fractional shortening, LVEF the left ventricular ejection fraction, HR heart rate
*P < 0.05 relative to CTL group
†P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group
Fig. 1Administration of DAPA attenuates cardiac remodeling and improves cardiac dysfunction induced by Ang II in rats. A, B Analysis of ELISA of plasma ANP, BNP and Ang II levels; C HW, LVW, HW/TL ratios and HW/TL ratios; D representative examples of M-mode echocardiography images; E representative examples of left ventricular four-chamber 2Dspeckle tracking echocardiography imaging. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group). *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group
The effects of DAPA treatment on quantitative tissue velocity imaging parameters parameters
| Parameters | CTL | CTL + DAPA | Ang II | Ang II + DAPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s (mm/s) | 2.68 ± 0.34 | 2.62 ± 0.28 | 1.66 ± 0.14* | 1.96 ± 0.15† |
| a (mm/s) | 1.87 ± 0.26 | 1.84 ± 0.22 | 1.38 ± 0.20* | 1.66 ± 0.17† |
| e (mm/s) | 2.89 ± 0.36 | 2.92 ± 0.44 | 1.84 ± 0.32* | 2.66 ± 0.25† |
| a/e ratio | 0.64 ± 0.12 | 0.63 ± 0.14 | 1.09 ± 0.13* | 0.89 ± 0.11† |
| s′ (mm/s) | 2.64 ± 0.31 | 2.60 ± 0.22 | 1.58 ± 0.28* | 2.09 ± 0.29† |
| a′(mm/s) | 2.42 ± 0.23 | 2.46 ± 0.28 | 1.86 ± 0.23* | 2.27 ± 0.21† |
| e′ (mm/s) | 3.74 ± 0.33 | 3.80 ± 0.42 | 2.21 ± 0.28* | 2.86 ± 0.37† |
| a′/e′ ratio | 0.82 ± 0.12 | 0.80 ± 0.14 | 0.96 ± 0.10* | 0.88 ± 0.08† |
| save (mm/s) | 2.92 ± 0.24 | 2.89 ± 0.28 | 1.67 ± 0.23* | 2.19 ± 0.18† |
| aave (mm/s) | 2.57 ± 0.60 | 2.47 ± 0.52 | 1.87 ± 0.36* | 2.19 ± 0.34† |
| eave (mm/s) | 3.67 ± 0.32 | 3.68 ± 0.28 | 1.92 ± 0.32* | 2.64 ± 0.24† |
| aave/eave | 0.69 ± 0.14 | 0.68 ± 0.21 | 0.96 ± 0.21* | 0.74 ± 0.27† |
| E/eave | 28.68 ± 0.46 | 29.64 ± 0.48 | 46.24 ± 0.58* | 36.49 ± 0.54† |
| GLS (%) | − 12.18 ± 2.17 | − 11.95 ± 2.42 | − 7.57 ± 1.29* | − 12.64 ± 1.3† |
Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group)
s: peak systolic mitral annular velocity at lateral side; s′: peak systolic mitral annular velocity at septal side; save: average value of the peak systolic mitral annular velocity; a: late diastolic mitral annular velocity at lateral side; a′: late diastolic mitral annular velocity at septal side; aave: average value of the late diastolic mitral annular velocity; e: early diastolic mitral annular velocity at the lateral side; e′: early diastolic mitral annular velocity at the septal side; eave: average value of the early diastolic mitral annular velocity; E: Peak velocities of diastolic early transmitral Doppler flow; GLS: global longitudinal strain
*P < 0.05 relative to CTL group
†P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group
Fig. 2Administration of DAPA attenuates Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. A H&E staining of the cross-section of the heart. Scale bar = 2000 μm; B The cardiomyocyte cross-section area (CSA) was stained with H&E staining. Scale bars = 50 μm; C quantification of cardiomyocyte cross-section areas. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group). *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group
Fig. 3DAPA treatment suppresses matrix accumulation and myocardial fibrosis in vitro and in vivo. A The effects of DAPA on the fibrosis in myocardial tissue were observed by PSR staining (top), Scale bars = 100 μm; red color represents collagen fibers deposition. Meanwhile, the expression of type I collagen, type III collagen and α-SMA (bottom) in the myocardium was detected by immunostaining and DAPI staining. Scale bars = 100 μm; B quantification of red color in bar graph. OD values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group). C–E Immunohistochemical analysis for the effect of DAPA on Ang II-induced expression of type I collagen, type III collagen and α-SMA in myocardial tissue. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6 rats per group). *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group. F Effects of DAPA treatment on expression of type I collagen, type III collagen, α-SMA in Ang II-infused rats were examined by immunoblotting. The relative ratio of type I collagen, type III collagen, α-SMA over β-actin was determined by densitometric analysis respectively.Values are means ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group. G DAPA inhibits Ang II-induced expression of type I collagen, type III collagen, α-SMA and TGF-β1 in CFs. CFs treated with the indicated concentrations of DAPA for 1 h were exposed to Ang II for 24 h. The relative ratio of type I collagen, type III collagen, α-SMA and TGF-β1 over β-actin was determined by densitometric analysis respectively.Values are means ± SD (n = 3). DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide. Values are means ± SD. *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group. §P < 0.05 relative to Ang II plus DAPA 0.5 group
Fig. 4DAPA treatment inhibits the activation of the TGF-β1/Smad pathway in rats with continuous Ang II infusion. A Immunohistochemical analysis for the effect of DAPA on Ang II-induced expression of TGF-β1in myocardial tissue. Values are presented as means ± SD (n = 6 rats per group). *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group.Scale bars = 100 μm; B inhibition of Ang II infusion -induced activation of TGF-β1/Smad pathway. The relative ratio of TGF-β1 and Smad7 over β-actin was determined by densitometric analysis respectively. Also, the ratio of phosphor-Smad2/Smad2 and phosphor-Smad3/Smad3 was calculated based on densitometric analysis. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.05 relative to CTL group. †P < 0.05 relative to Ang II group