| Literature DB >> 34116633 |
Chengpeng Li1,2, Dexiang Tang1,2, Yuanbing Wang1,2,3, Qi Fan1,2, Xiaomei Zhang1,2,3,4, Xiaolong Cui5, Hong Yu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The genus Ophiocordyceps, which includes Ophiocordyceps sinensis, has been demonstrated to be one of the most valuable medicinal taxa. The low rate of larval infection and slow development that characterize the cultivation of this genus should be urgently addressed. To identify potential bioinoculants that stimulate the growth of Ophiocordyceps, O. highlandensis was selected as a model system, and a total of 72 samples were collected to systematically compare the microbial communities present during fruiting body development. By applying high-throughput 16S and ITS2 amplicon sequencing technology, the bacterial and fungal communities were identified in O. highlandensis and its surrounding soil, and the functional dynamics of the bacteria were explored.Entities:
Keywords: Bioinoculants; Cultivation; Fruiting body development; Microbial assemblages; Ophiocordyceps highlandensis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34116633 PMCID: PMC8196446 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02227-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Habitats and morphology of O. highlandensis at six time points from April to September. The map was created with ArcGIS 10.2 software. All the photographs were generated with a regular digital camera. April, white larva; May, dead ossified larva, gold; June, stroma rising from the head of the host larva, solitary, 2–4 cm long, stipe cylindrical, 2–3 mm in diam, smooth; July, 6–8 cm long, 1.5–2.5 mm in diam, dark-brown to blackish; August, fertile portion of stroma growing; September, Polycephalomyces synnemata rising from the stroma of Ophiocordyceps highlandensis (repeated parasitization)
Fig. 2Taxonomic profiles of bacteria and fungi inhabiting O. highlandensis and its surrounding soil for the different developmental stages of the fungus. A Line chart highlighting the relative abundances of bacteria at the phylum level and class level (pertaining to Proteobacteria) in the fruiting body. B The relative abundances of fungi at the phylum level sampled in the fruiting body. C The relative abundances of bacteria at the phylum level and class level (pertaining to Proteobacteria) in the soil surrounding the fruiting body. D The relative abundances of fungi at the phylum level sampled in the soil surrounding the fruiting body
Fig. 3Box plot of the multivariate alpha dispersions and principal component analysis (PCA) of the bacterial and fungal composition in samples from both the fruiting body and its surrounding soil. A Comparisons of bacterial alpha dispersions (Shannon richness index) grouped with multivariate variables. B PCA of bacteria based on a Bray-Curtis distance matrix. C Comparisons of fungal alpha dispersions (Shannon richness index) grouped with multivariate variables. D PCA of fungi based on a Bray-Curtis distance matrix
Results of a Kruskal-Wallis test of the bacterial and fungal community composition in the fruiting body and microhabitat soil samples. H is the statistical parameter for Kruskal-Wallis tests. The P-values are based on the Shannon diversity and Evenness indexes computed from the OTU tables. The bold values indicate statistically significant results
| Bacteria | Fungi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | H | ||||
| Fruiting Body | Shannon diversity | 26.910 | < 0.01 | 6.918 | 0.227 |
| Evenness | 27.933 | < 0.01 | 7.055 | 0.217 | |
| Microhabitat Soil | Shannon diversity | 8.07 | 0.152 | 6.907 | 0.228 |
| Evenness | 9.440 | 0.093 | 7.601 | 0.180 | |
Pairwise comparisons of the Shannon diversity and Evenness indexes of the bacterial groups inhabiting the fruiting body. The bold values indicate statistically significant results
| shannon | corB4 | corB5 | corB6 | corB7 | corB8 | corB9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evenness | ||||||
| corB4 | 0.565 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.007 | |
| corB5 | 0.289 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | |
| corB6 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.134 | 0.299 | 0.134 | |
| corB7 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.052 | 0.036 | 0.233 | |
| corB8 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.556 | 0.023 | 0.075 | |
| corB9 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.072 | 0.229 | 0.072 |
Fig. 4LEfSe analysis (LDA) of the bacterial taxa (LDA score > 3.5) characterizing the differences in the phylogenetic richness among samples. The circles indicate the taxonomic level (from phylum to genus). The letter and number combinations indicate different taxonomic groups (from order to family). The size of the circles indicates the abundance of each community. Different group regions are colored uniquely
Fig. 5Different functions among the samples. A Principal coordinate analysis of the functional pathways represented by the endogenic bacterial communities. The analysis relies on a Bray-Curtis distance matrix and shows the percentage of each axis on the graph explaining the total variance. B Different pathways represented by O. highlandensis-inhabiting bacterial communities in the developmental stages analyzed. A P-value (log 10) higher than three was considered significant
Fig. 6The bipartite network based on the relationships between OTUs and pathways enriched in six different developmental stages of O. highlandensis. Each significantly enriched pathway in the different stages is marked with large colored circles (pathway_nodes). The small circles (OTU_nodes) represent the OTUs, shown in white. The edges connect through the OTU_nodes to the pathway_nodes in which they are included. The inner OTU nodes connect multiple pathway nodes, while the unique OTU nodes in each period are located around the outside of the bipartite network