Literature DB >> 34116480

The effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod-A comparison of international registry studies.

Johanna B Andersen1, Sifat Sharmin2, Mathilde Lefort3, Nils Koch-Henriksen4, Finn Sellebjerg5, Per Soelberg Sørensen6, Claudia C Hilt Christensen7, Peter V Rasmussen8, Michael B Jensen9, Jette L Frederiksen10, Stephan Bramow5, Henrik K Mathiesen6, Karen I Schreiber5, Dana Horakova11, Eva K Havrdova11, Raed Alroughani12, Guillermo Izquierdo13, Sara Eichau13, Serkan Ozakbas14, Francesco Patti15, Marco Onofrj16, Alessandra Lugaresi17, Murat Terzi18, Pierre Grammond19, Francois Grand Maison20, Bassem Yamout21, Alexandre Prat22, Marc Girard22, Pierre Duquette22, Cavit Boz23, Maria Trojano24, Pamela McCombe25, Mark Slee26, Jeannette Lechner-Scott27, Recai Turkoglu28, Patrizia Sola29, Diana Ferraro29, Franco Granella30, Vahid Shaygannejad31, Julie Prevost32, Olga Skibina33, Claudio Solaro34, Rana Karabudak35, Bart V Wijmeersch36, Tunde Csepany37, Daniele Spitaleri38, Steve Vucic39, Romain Casey40, Marc Debouverie41, Gilles Edan42, Jonathan Ciron43, Aurélie Ruet44, Jérôme D Sèze45, Elisabeth Maillart46, Hélène Zephir47, Pierre Labauge48, Gilles Defer49, Christine Lebrun50, Thibault Moreau51, Eric Berger52, Pierre Clavelou53, Jean Pelletier54, Bruno Stankoff55, Olivier Gout56, Eric Thouvenot57, Olivier Heinzlef58, Abdullatif Al-Khedr59, Bertrand Bourre60, Olivier Casez61, Philippe Cabre62, Alexis Montcuquet63, Abir Wahab64, Jean-Philippe Camdessanché65, Aude Marousset66, Ivania Patry67, Karolina Hankiewicz68, Corinne Pottier69, Nicolas Maubeuge70, Céline Labeyrie71, Chantal Nifle72, Emmanuelle Leray3, David A Laplaud73, Helmut Butzkueven74, Tomas Kalincik75, Sandra Vukusic76, Melinda Magyari77.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab and fingolimod were the first preparations recommended for disease breakthrough in priorly treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Of three published head-to-head studies two showed that natalizumab is the more effective to prevent relapses and EDSS worsening.
METHODS: By re-analyzing original published results from MSBase, France, and Denmark using uniform methodologies, we aimed at identifying the effects of differences in methodology, in the MS-populations, and at re-evaluating the differences in effectiveness between the two drugs. We gained access to copies of the individual amended databases and pooled all data. We used uniform inclusion/exclusion criteria and statistical methods with Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting.
RESULTS: The pooled analyses comprised 968 natalizumab- and 1479 fingolimod treated patients. The on-treatment natalizumab/fingolimod relapse rate ratio was 0.77 (p=0.004). The hazard ratio (HR) for a first relapse was 0.82 (p=0.030), and the HR for sustained EDSS improvement was 1.4 (p=0.009). There were modest differences between each of the original published studies and the replication study, but the conclusions of the three original studies remained unchanged: in two of them natalizumab was more effective, but in the third there was no difference between natalizumab and fingolimod.
CONCLUSION: The results were largely invariant to the epidemiological and statistical methods but differed between the MS populations. Generally, the advantage of natalizumab was confirmed.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fingolimod; Head-to-head comparison; Multiple sclerosis; Natalizumab; Treatment effectiveness

Year:  2021        PMID: 34116480     DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord        ISSN: 2211-0348            Impact factor:   4.339


  2 in total

1.  Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab Versus Anti-CD20 in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis After Fingolimod Withdrawal.

Authors:  Fabien Rollot; Justine Couturier; Romain Casey; Sandrine Wiertlewski; Marc Debouverie; Jean Pelletier; Jérôme De Sèze; Pierre Labauge; Aurélie Ruet; Eric Thouvenot; Jonathan Ciron; Eric Berger; Olivier Gout; Pierre Clavelou; Bruno Stankoff; Olivier Casez; Bertrand Bourre; Hélène Zephir; Thibault Moreau; Christine Lebrun-Frenay; Elisabeth Maillart; Gilles Edan; Jean-Philippe Neau; Alexis Montcuquet; Philippe Cabre; Jean-Philippe Camdessanché; Gilles Defer; Haifa Ben Nasr; Aude Maurousset; Karolina Hankiewicz; Corinne Pottier; Emmanuelle Leray; Sandra Vukusic; David-Axel Laplaud
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.088

2.  Impact of methodological choices in comparative effectiveness studies: application in natalizumab versus fingolimod comparison among patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Lefort; S Sharmin; J B Andersen; M Magyari; T Kalincik; E Leray; S Vukusic; R Casey; M Debouverie; G Edan; J Ciron; A Ruet; J De Sèze; E Maillart; H Zephir; P Labauge; G Defer; C Lebrun-Frenay; T Moreau; E Berger; P Clavelou; J Pelletier; B Stankoff; O Gout; E Thouvenot; O Heinzlef; A Al-Khedr; B Bourre; O Casez; P Cabre; A Montcuquet; A Wahab; J P Camdessanché; A Maurousset; H Ben Nasr; K Hankiewicz; C Pottier; N Maubeuge; D Dimitri-Boulos; C Nifle; D A Laplaud; D Horakova; E K Havrdova; R Alroughani; G Izquierdo; S Eichau; S Ozakbas; F Patti; M Onofrj; A Lugaresi; M Terzi; P Grammond; F Grand'Maison; B Yamout; A Prat; M Girard; P Duquette; C Boz; M Trojano; P McCombe; M Slee; J Lechner-Scott; R Turkoglu; P Sola; D Ferraro; F Granella; V Shaygannejad; J Prevost; D Maimone; O Skibina; K Buzzard; A Van der Walt; R Karabudak; B Van Wijmeersch; T Csepany; D Spitaleri; S Vucic; N Koch-Henriksen; F Sellebjerg; P S Soerensen; C C Hilt Christensen; P V Rasmussen; M B Jensen; J L Frederiksen; S Bramow; H K Mathiesen; K I Schreiber; H Butzkueven
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.612

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.