Prashant Donthamsetti1, David B Konrad2, Belinda Hetzler3, Zhu Fu1, Dirk Trauner3, Ehud Y Isacoff1,4,5. 1. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstraße 5-13, 81377 Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States. 4. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 5. Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most common targets of drug discovery. However, the similarity between related GPCRs combined with the complex spatiotemporal dynamics of receptor activation in vivo has hindered drug development. Photopharmacology offers the possibility of using light to control the location and timing of drug action by incorporating a photoisomerizable azobenzene into a GPCR ligand, enabling rapid and reversible switching between an inactive and active configuration. Recent advances in this area include (i) photoagonists and photoantagonists that directly control receptor activity but are nonselective because they bind conserved sites, and (ii) photoallosteric modulators that bind selectively to nonconserved sites but indirectly control receptor activity by modulating the response to endogenous ligand. In this study, we designed a photoswitchable allosteric agonist that targets a nonconserved allosteric site for selectivity and activates the receptor on its own to provide direct control. This work culminated in the development of aBINA, a photoswitchable allosteric agonist that selectively activates the Gi/o-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2). aBINA is the first example of a new class of precision drugs for GPCRs and other clinically important signaling proteins.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most common targets of drug discovery. However, the similarity between related GPCRs combined with the complex spatiotemporal dynamics of receptor activation in vivo has hindered drug development. Photopharmacology offers the possibility of using light to control the location and timing of drug action by incorporating a photoisomerizable azobenzene into a GPCR ligand, enabling rapid and reversible switching between an inactive and active configuration. Recent advances in this area include (i) photoagonists and photoantagonists that directly control receptor activity but are nonselective because they bind conserved sites, and (ii) photoallosteric modulators that bind selectively to nonconserved sites but indirectly control receptor activity by modulating the response to endogenous ligand. In this study, we designed a photoswitchable allosteric agonist that targets a nonconserved allosteric site for selectivity and activates the receptor on its own to provide direct control. This work culminated in the development of aBINA, a photoswitchable allosteric agonist that selectively activates the Gi/o-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2). aBINA is the first example of a new class of precision drugs for GPCRs and other clinically important signaling proteins.
G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs) are membrane proteins that play important roles in health
and disease.[1] They are expressed in virtually
every cell, are activated by diverse stimuli (chemicals, peptides,
light), and initiate pleiotropic signaling via canonical G protein-
and noncanonical arrestin-dependent pathways.[1] GPCRs are the most common targets of drug discovery efforts, constituting
36% of approved drugs (∼700 compounds).[2] The development of therapeutically efficacious drugs, however, is
hindered by the complex nature of GPCR function. First, the endogenous
ligand binding site (orthosteric site) to which most drugs bind can
be highly similar in related GPCRs, making it difficult to target
specific receptor subtypes.[3,4] Second, each GPCR can
be expressed and have distinct functions in more than one location.
Third, the timing by which GPCRs are turned on and off by their endogenous
ligands (milliseconds to tens of seconds[5−7]) is a major determinant
of downstream signaling and physiological outcome.[8,9] These
factors compound the challenge of developing drugs that can target
specific receptor subtypes with spatiotemporal precision.The
advent of photopharmacology has opened the door to using patterned
light to control drug action with spatial and temporal specificity.[10−13] GPCR ligands are transformed into rapid and reversible optical photoswitches
by employing azobenzene, a chemical moiety that isomerizes between
its trans and cis configurations
within milliseconds in response to specific wavelengths of light.[14] Azobenzene is placed close to or within a receptor
ligand,[15] allowing it to switch between
two states: one that is exposed and can bind the receptor and one
that is obstructed and cannot bind the receptor. Nonetheless, most
photoswitchable GPCR ligands are not absolutely selective for specific
receptor subtypes because they contain inherently nonselective agonists
or antagonists that bind the orthosteric site.[11,16−23]To increase the specificity, a class of receptor ligands called
allosteric modulators[24−26] was recently converted into photopharmaceuticals.
Allosteric modulators bind nonconserved receptor binding sites (allosteric
sites), increasing the likelihood of establishing a selective interaction
with a specific receptor subtype. Unlike agonists and antagonists,
allosteric modulators have no effect on receptor function in the absence
of endogenous ligand binding. Instead, they potentiate (as positive
allosteric modulators; PAMs) or decrease (as negative allosteric modulators;
NAMs) the actions of the endogenous ligand.[27] This feature would allow photoswitchable allosteric modulators to
control signaling without disrupting the natural temporal dynamics
of receptor activation, which may be therapeutically beneficial for
certain disease states but less effective when the endogenous ligand
is dysregulated (Figure S1). For example,
the precise millisecond to second-time scale release dynamics of the
major excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate in the brain is disrupted
in neurological disorders such as epilepsy, schizophrenia, bipolar
disorder, and depression.[28]Whereas
allosteric modulators have no effect on their own, allosteric
agonists bind to the allosteric site and activate the receptor independently
of the endogenous ligand.[29] In this study,
we sought to combine the receptor subtype selective and agonistic
properties of allosteric agonists with the rapid and reversible photoswitching
properties of azobenzene. The development of photoswitchable allosteric
agonists would represent a considerable advance in drug design, resulting
in compounds that, by not relying on the endogenous ligand, have the
potential to override aberrant receptor signaling with subtype-selectivity
and spatiotemporal precision (Figure S1).To develop a photoswitchable allosteric agonist, we targeted
metabotropic
glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2), a Gi/o-coupled family C
GPCR dimer (Figure ), which has been proposed as a target for the treatment of schizophrenia
and anxiety.[30] Conventional mGluR2 agonists
or antagonists are nonselective, as they bind a large extracellular
glutamate-binding ligand binding domain (LBD) that is highly conserved
with mGluR3 (Figure A).[30] Several mGluR2-selective allosteric
ligands have recently emerged that bind in the receptor’s transmembrane
domain (TMD; Figure B,C),[31] which is less conserved across
mGluRs (Figure B).
Among them, we chose biphenyl-indanone A (BINA) as a parent compound
for the development of a photoswitchable allosteric agonist because
it is highly mGluR2-selective and displays robust agonist activity.[32−35]
Figure 1
Photoswitchable
allosteric agonists are receptor subtype selective
and operate independently of endogenous ligands. (A) mGluR2 (gray)
is an obligate dimer that binds its endogenous ligand glutamate in
its orthosteric site formed by a large extracellular ligand binding
domain (LBD). A photoswitchable agonist or antagonist binds to the
orthosteric site in only one photoisomeric configuration. Because
the orthosteric site of mGluR2 is conserved in mGluR3, photoswitchable
agonists and antagonists are not likely to be receptor subtype selective.
(B) A photoswitchable allosteric modulator (PAM or NAM) binds selectively
to mGluR2 in a nonconserved allosteric site formed by the receptor
transmembrane domain (TMD) but depends on glutamate binding to affect
receptor function. (C) A photoswitchable allosteric agonist binds
selectively to the allosteric site of mGluR2 and activates the receptor
independently of glutamate.
Photoswitchable
allosteric agonists are receptor subtype selective
and operate independently of endogenous ligands. (A) mGluR2 (gray)
is an obligate dimer that binds its endogenous ligand glutamate in
its orthosteric site formed by a large extracellular ligand binding
domain (LBD). A photoswitchable agonist or antagonist binds to the
orthosteric site in only one photoisomeric configuration. Because
the orthosteric site of mGluR2 is conserved in mGluR3, photoswitchable
agonists and antagonists are not likely to be receptor subtype selective.
(B) A photoswitchable allosteric modulator (PAM or NAM) binds selectively
to mGluR2 in a nonconserved allosteric site formed by the receptor
transmembrane domain (TMD) but depends on glutamate binding to affect
receptor function. (C) A photoswitchable allosteric agonist binds
selectively to the allosteric site of mGluR2 and activates the receptor
independently of glutamate.To develop a photoswitchable analog of BINA, we used molecular
docking analyses to explore the effect of exchanging its benzyloxy-dimethylbenzene
group with azobenzene (azobenzene-BINA or aBINA; Figure A,B). As previously observed,[33,36] our docking showed that BINA can bind in the mGluR2 TMD, forming
hydrophobic contacts with residues L639 and F643 and hydrogen bonding
with R635 (Figure C). Whereas the trans configuration of aBINA bound
mGluR2 in a pose similar to that observed for BINA (Figure D), the cis configuration did not interact with residues deeper in the binding
site or hydrogen bond with R635 (Figure E). These results suggested that aBINA can
adopt two functionally distinct configurations, an extended pose that
mimics the binding mode of BINA (trans) and a constrained
pose that is unable to form critical contacts with the receptor (cis).
Figure 2
Design of aBINA. (A) Chemical structure of BINA, which
contains
a benzyloxy-dimethylbenzene group that is suitable for an exchange
with azobenzene. (B) Chemical structure of aBINA, which interconverts
between its trans and cis configurations
with light. (C) According to molecular docking analyses, BINA binds
mGluR2 at an allosteric site formed within the receptor transmembrane
domain (TMD). The carboxyl group of BINA hydrogen bonds with R635
of mGluR2 (red line) and forms hydrophobic contacts with residues
throughout the binding site (green side chains). (D) The trans configuration of aBINA binds in the TMD of mGluR2 in a manner similar
to BINA. (E) Unlike BINA or the trans configuration
of aBINA, the cis configuration of aBINA does not
hydrogen bond with R635 or form hydrophobic contacts with residues
deep within the allosteric binding pocket.
Design of aBINA. (A) Chemical structure of BINA, which
contains
a benzyloxy-dimethylbenzene group that is suitable for an exchange
with azobenzene. (B) Chemical structure of aBINA, which interconverts
between its trans and cis configurations
with light. (C) According to molecular docking analyses, BINA binds
mGluR2 at an allosteric site formed within the receptor transmembrane
domain (TMD). The carboxyl group of BINA hydrogen bonds with R635
of mGluR2 (red line) and forms hydrophobic contacts with residues
throughout the binding site (green side chains). (D) The trans configuration of aBINA binds in the TMD of mGluR2 in a manner similar
to BINA. (E) Unlike BINA or the trans configuration
of aBINA, the cis configuration of aBINA does not
hydrogen bond with R635 or form hydrophobic contacts with residues
deep within the allosteric binding pocket.To synthesize aBINA (Figure ), the commercial benzyl bromide 1 was substituted
with cyclopentylamine. The resulting nitroarene 2 was
hydrogenatively reduced to aniline 3 and selectively
oxidized to the nitrosoarene 4. This nitrosoarene 4 was coupled with the biaryl aniline 5 in a
Baeyer–Mills reaction and gave the azobenzene derivative 6. Hydrolysis of the methyl ester (6) with LiOH
provided aBINA in good yields.
Figure 3
Chemical synthesis of aBINA.
Chemical synthesis of aBINA.We next characterized the photophysical properties of aBINA.
aBINA
efficiently converted to its cis configuration with
wavelengths ranging from 340 and 380 nm (UV) light and to its trans configuration with wavelengths ranging from 400 to
600 nm (visible) light, according to UV/vis spectroscopy (Figures A and S2A–D) and LCMS (Figure S2E,F). These photoswitching wavelengths are slightly hypsochromic
relative to that of azobenzene,[14] which
is likely due to electron-withdrawing substituents in the aromatic
system. In most subsequent studies, 420 nm light and 340 nm light
were used. aBINA switched between its trans and cis configuration over multiple cycles without any loss
of activity (Figure B). Furthermore, both configurations of aBINA were sufficiently stable
toward thermal relaxation (Figure S2G–I), and thus the compound is considered bistable.
Figure 4
Photophysical properties
of aBINA. (A) Absorbance spectra of aBINA
(20 μM in 10% DMSO) in the dark or under 340 or 420 nm light.
(B) aBINA reversibly and repeatedly switched to its trans configuration with 420 nm light and to its cis configuration
with 340 nm light.
Photophysical properties
of aBINA. (A) Absorbance spectra of aBINA
(20 μM in 10% DMSO) in the dark or under 340 or 420 nm light.
(B) aBINA reversibly and repeatedly switched to its trans configuration with 420 nm light and to its cis configuration
with 340 nm light.To evaluate the effect
of aBINA on mGluR2, we used a mGluR2-mediated
G protein-inwardly rectifying potassium channel (GIRK) activation
assay (Figure S3).[37] mGluR2 and a homotetramerizing mutant of GIRK1 (F137S) were transiently
transfected into HEK293T cells, whereby receptor activation results
in Gi/o-dependent GIRK activation and enhanced inward-current.
Transfected cells were patch clamped in whole-cell configuration and
exposed to alternating 420 nm light and 340 nm light to interconvert
aBINA between its trans and cis configuration,
respectively. The application of aBINA under 420 nm light (trans; 100 nM) robustly activated mGluR2 relative to a saturating
concentration (1 mM) of glutamate (70 ± 4%, n = 8 cells; Figure A,C). This effect was not observed in cells expressing GIRK alone
or in cells expressing a mutant of mGluR2 (N735D) in which the allosteric
binding site in the receptor TMD is disabled (Figure S4),[33] indicating that aBINA
operates through the known allosteric mechanism. The effect of the trans configuration of aBINA was largely reversed by switching
the compound to the cis configuration with 340 nm
light (Figure A,C),
a photoeffect not observed in the absence of aBINA (0 ± 1% of
1 mM glutamate, n = 4 cells; Figure A). mGluR2 activation in response to aBINA
under 420 nm light could also be reversed with 360 nm light (Figure S5), which has greater biocompatibility
than 340 nm light. Photoactivation of mGluR2 with aBINA was rapid
and repeatable (Figure A), consistent with its photophysical properties.
Figure 5
aBINA is a selective
photoswitchable allosteric agonist of mGluR2.
(A) mGluR2 is activated by the trans configuration
of aBINA (420 nm light) in the GIRK assay. This effect is reversed
by switching to cis configuration of aBINA (340 nm
light) or washout. Photoactivation of mGluR2 with aBINA is rapid and
repeatable. (B) Dose-dependent effect of aBINA on mGluR2 under 420
nm light and 340 nm light. n = 3–9 cells per
concentration. (C) Summary of the effect of aBINA on various mGluRs.
The effect of aBINA on mGluR2 under 420 nm light was significantly
different from all other conditions. One-way ANOVA, F = 48.7, ****p < 0.0001 for each comparison.
aBINA is a selective
photoswitchable allosteric agonist of mGluR2.
(A) mGluR2 is activated by the trans configuration
of aBINA (420 nm light) in the GIRK assay. This effect is reversed
by switching to cis configuration of aBINA (340 nm
light) or washout. Photoactivation of mGluR2 with aBINA is rapid and
repeatable. (B) Dose-dependent effect of aBINA on mGluR2 under 420
nm light and 340 nm light. n = 3–9 cells per
concentration. (C) Summary of the effect of aBINA on various mGluRs.
The effect of aBINA on mGluR2 under 420 nm light was significantly
different from all other conditions. One-way ANOVA, F = 48.7, ****p < 0.0001 for each comparison.The potency of the trans configuration
of aBINA
was ∼11-fold lower than that of the parent compound BINA[32−34] (Figure S6), indicating that the replacement
of benzyloxy-dimethylbenzene with the trans-isomer
of azobenzene somewhat diminishes agonist affinity. aBINA activated
mGluR2 at high concentrations under 340 nm light (Figure B). The degree of activation
was consistent with the presence of a minor fraction of active trans configuration (Figures S2E,F and S7). Taken together, these results indicate that aBINA is a
photoswitchable allosteric agonist of mGluR2 that activates the receptor
in the trans configuration but not the cis configuration.Whereas the effect of aBINA on mGluR2 was reversed
after minutes
of washout (Figures A and S8), the parent compound BINA is
resistant to washout due to its high hydrophobicity (cLogP = 8.3)
and ability to form a reservoir in the plasma membrane.[35] The faster washout of aBINA is consistent with
the reduction in hydrophobicity by ∼200-fold (cLogP = 6.0)
due to the substitution of the indanone scaffold with isoindolinone
and the replacement of the benzyloxy-dimethylbenzene with azobenzene.The parent compound BINA is a PAM that potentiates the potency
of glutamate at mGluR2 by ∼5–10 fold.[32−34] To evaluate
whether aBINA is also a PAM, we examined the activation induced by
a low dose (100 nM) of glutamate in the presence of the active trans configuration of aBINA (Figure S9A,B). Low-dose glutamate activated mGluR2 under these conditions
(Figure S9C–E), indicating that
aBINA has PAM activity. However, because aBINA nearly fully activates
mGluR2 on its own (Figure A,C), the effect of low-dose glutamate with aBINA was limited
(Figure S9C–E). Thus, although aBINA
acts as a PAM, its dominant effect on mGluR2 is allosteric agonism.We next evaluated whether aBINA is selective for mGluR2. The eight
mGluRs belong to three groups (I–III) based on sequence and
function.[30] We tested the effect of aBINA
on the closest homologue of mGluR2, the single other group II member
mGluR3, as well as one representative of the other groups: mGluR1
(Group I) and mGluR4 as well as mGluR7 (group III). Like BINA, aBINA
had no effect on any of these receptors under 420 nm light or 340
nm light (Figures C and S10), indicating that aBINA is highly
selective for mGluR2.We next sought to determine whether aBINA
can control the native
mGluR2 of neurons. To accomplish this, we measured the effect of aBINA
on the activity of primary cortical neurons (CNs) in culture using
whole-cell current-clamp recordings. Consistent with the effects of
the orthosteric mGluR2 agonist LY379268,[37] the active trans configuration of aBINA (100 nM;
420 nm light) suppressed spontaneous CN firing (Figure A,B). This effect was reversed by switching
aBINA to its inactive cis configuration with 340
nm light (Figure A,B).
Photoinhibition was rapid and repeatable (Figure A,B). aBINA had no effect on spontaneous
firing in the presence of a saturating concentration of the mGluR2-selective
NAM MNI137 (10 μM; Figure C,D), which competes with aBINA for the allosteric
binding site. Taken together, aBINA selectively photoactivates endogenous
mGluR2 in CNs.
Figure 6
aBINA photoactivates endogenous mGluR2 in primary cortical
neurons.
(A) aBINA decreases spontaneous firing of primary cortical neurons
(CNs) under 420 nm light (trans), which is reversed
by switching to 340 nm light (cis). (B) Summary of
the effect of aBINA on CNs. n = 4 neurons. RM one-way
ANOVA, F = 31.6, *p < 0.05. (C)
aBINA has no effect on CNs in the presence of a saturating concentration
of the mGluR2-selective NAM MNI137. Summary of the effect of aBINA
on CNs in the presence of MNI137. n = 4 neurons.
RM one-way ANOVA, F = 0.9; there were no significant
differences between any condition.
aBINA photoactivates endogenous mGluR2 in primary cortical
neurons.
(A) aBINA decreases spontaneous firing of primary cortical neurons
(CNs) under 420 nm light (trans), which is reversed
by switching to 340 nm light (cis). (B) Summary of
the effect of aBINA on CNs. n = 4 neurons. RM one-way
ANOVA, F = 31.6, *p < 0.05. (C)
aBINA has no effect on CNs in the presence of a saturating concentration
of the mGluR2-selective NAM MNI137. Summary of the effect of aBINA
on CNs in the presence of MNI137. n = 4 neurons.
RM one-way ANOVA, F = 0.9; there were no significant
differences between any condition.Although significant progress has recently been made toward applying
photopharmacology in intact organisms,[11] the success of photopharmaceuticals as therapeutics will depend
on ligand efficacy, affinity, and target specificity. While orthosteric
agonists can combine high efficacy and affinity, conservation of the
orthosteric binding pocket makes it difficult to create completely
selective ligands.[4] In contrast, allosteric
ligands usually bind to much less conserved pockets and can more readily
be imparted with selectivity. However, these allosteric ligands typically
have no direct activity and instead modulate the response to the endogenous
orthosteric ligand. Our example of a photoswitchable allosteric agonist
combines target specificity with high efficacy and affinity while
also bypassing the endogenous ligand. In addition, the installation
of the azobenzene moiety into the parent compound BINA resulted in
a reduction in hydrophobicity without substantially sacrificing activity,
increasing its therapeutic potential.The development of photoswitchable
allosteric agonists requires
suitable parent molecules for incorporation with azobenzene. Like
aBINA, some allosteric agonists are partial agonists and/or have PAM
activity (so-called ago-PAMs). Therefore, further efforts could result
in new high efficacy, pure allosteric agonists of GPCRs. Nevertheless,
allosteric agonists are available for diverse and clinically important
GPCRs such as other mGluRs,[38] cannabinoid
receptors,[39] free fatty acid receptors,[40] GABAB receptors,[41] muscarinic receptors,[42] and
serotonin receptors.[43] Moreover, small
molecules that harness the same mechanism have been identified for
ligand-gated ion channels such as GABAA receptors,[44] suggesting that the photoswitchable allosteric
agonist approach is broadly applicable. As such, our study sets the
stage for the development of photoswitchable allosteric agonists that
enable the control of GPCRs and ligand-gated ion channels with high
spatiotemporal control and subtype specificity. We are also intrigued
by the potential of combining this new class of drug with azobenzene
derivatives that photoisomerize in response to wavelengths of light
that penetrate biological tissue more efficiently (650–950
nm)[45,46] and with membrane anchors that are introduced
virally to provide photocontrol in genetically selected cells.[37]
Authors: Tracy A Spalding; Carol Trotter; Niels Skjaerbaek; Terri L Messier; Erika A Currier; Ethan S Burstein; Donghui Li; Uli Hacksell; Mark R Brann Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Prashant C Donthamsetti; Johannes Broichhagen; Vojtech Vyklicky; Cherise Stanley; Zhu Fu; Meike Visel; Joshua L Levitz; Jonathan A Javitch; Dirk Trauner; Ehud Y Isacoff Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Matthias V Westphal; Michael A Schafroth; Roman C Sarott; Michael A Imhof; Christian P Bold; Philipp Leippe; Amey Dhopeshwarkar; Jessica M Grandner; Vsevolod Katritch; Ken Mackie; Dirk Trauner; Erick M Carreira; James A Frank Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Niels J Hauwert; Tamara A M Mocking; Daniel Da Costa Pereira; Albert J Kooistra; Lisa M Wijnen; Gerda C M Vreeker; Eléonore W E Verweij; Albertus H De Boer; Martine J Smit; Chris De Graaf; Henry F Vischer; Iwan J P de Esch; Maikel Wijtmans; Rob Leurs Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dmytro Havrylyuk; Austin C Hachey; Alexander Fenton; David K Heidary; Edith C Glazer Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Piermichele Kobauri; Nicole S Galenkamp; Albert M Schulte; Jisk de Vries; Nadja A Simeth; Giovanni Maglia; Sebastian Thallmair; Dušan Kolarski; Wiktor Szymanski; Ben L Feringa Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 7.446