Literature DB >> 34115262

Clinical utility of ultrasonography imaging in musculoskeletal conditions: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Summaiya Zareen Shaikh1, Dabholkar Tejashree2, Dabholkar Ajit2.   

Abstract

Optimising ultrasonography imaging (UI) applications for clients is a highly specific and sensitive add-on method. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the clinical utilisation of UI in musculoskeletal conditions by rehabilitation providers in the past decade. Two reviewers independently assessed relevant research articles from five databases electronically (Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCO) and screened titles and abstracts based on predefined eligibility criteria (2010- 2020). A total of 147 articles were screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently, and any disagreements were resolved by another reviewer using Rayyan QCRI software. Ninety-seven duplicates were removed, and after excluding 21 studies, 16 randomized controlled trials were included and full texts retrieved. Data were synthesised using Revman 5.4 software for qualitative analysis and risk-of-bias assessment. Four similar studies were statistically analysed for heterogeneity of abdominal muscle contraction ratios. Two interventional studies were also analysed to assess the effect of feedback. The diagnostic application of UI was investigated using a consistent amount of literature, though from a rehabilitation perspective the literature is inconclusive. The clinical utility of UI in rehabilitation by physical therapists is conclusive and has potential to advance clinical practice. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials minimising selection biases will help improve the quality in this domain. Critical reflection, clinical reasoning, and mutual goal setting will help practising physical therapists to scrutinize the clinical practice more objectively.
© 2021. The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal muscles; Biofeedback; Meta-analysis; Musculoskeletal; Physical therapists; Rehabilitation; Ultrasonography imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34115262     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-021-01104-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the quantitative assessment of the abdominal and lumbar trunk muscles.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Shane L Koppenhaver; Eric C Parent; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography vs. electromyography in carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Shawn C Roll; Jane Case-Smith; Kevin D Evans
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Jelena Savović; Matthew J Page; Roy G Elbers; Natalie S Blencowe; Isabelle Boutron; Christopher J Cates; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Mark S Corbett; Sandra M Eldridge; Jonathan R Emberson; Miguel A Hernán; Sally Hopewell; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Daniela R Junqueira; Peter Jüni; Jamie J Kirkham; Toby Lasserson; Tianjing Li; Alexandra McAleenan; Barnaby C Reeves; Sasha Shepperd; Ian Shrier; Lesley A Stewart; Kate Tilling; Ian R White; Penny F Whiting; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Clinimetric analysis of pressure biofeedback and transversus abdominis function in individuals with stabilization classification low back pain.

Authors:  Dustin R Grooms; Terry L Grindstaff; Theodore Croy; Joseph M Hart; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 5.  The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John R Fowler; John P Gaughan; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Clinical utilization of musculoskeletal sonography involving non-physician rehabilitation providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Shawn C Roll; Christina Asai; Julieann Tsai
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.874

7.  Five steps to conducting a systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid S Khan; Regina Kunz; Jos Kleijnen; Gerd Antes
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Examination and Imaging Findings for Identifying Subacromial Pain.

Authors:  Angela Cadogan; Peter J McNair; Mark Laslett; Wayne A Hing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data.

Authors:  Gehad Mohamed Tawfik; Kadek Agus Surya Dila; Muawia Yousif Fadlelmola Mohamed; Dao Ngoc Hien Tam; Nguyen Dang Kien; Ali Mahmoud Ahmed; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2019-08-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of ultrasonographic characteristics of deep abdominal muscles in women with and without chronic neck pain: a case-control study.

Authors:  Gamze Yalcinkaya; Seher Ozyurek; Orhan Kalemci; Yesim Salik Sengul
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 1.864

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.