Literature DB >> 34115200

Conventional approaches versus laser CO2 surgery in stapes surgery: a multicentre retrospective study.

Andrea De Vito1, Marco Mandalà2, Francesco Soprani1, Giannicola Iannella3,4, Valeria Roustan1, Francesca Viberti2, Ludovica Livi2, Stefano Pelucchi5, Gloria Napoli5, Antonino Maniaci6, Salvatore Cocuzza6, Claudio Vicini7,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare surgical and audiological outcomes of conventional approaches versus laser CO2 surgery in stapes surgery.
METHODS: 333 patients who underwent stapes surgery were enrolled in the study; the patient population was divided into three groups: group 1: 170 patients treated with conventional stapedotomy with manual microdrill (average age 49.13 years); group 2: 119 patients treated with conventional stapedotomy with electrical microdrill (average age 51.06 years); group 3: 44 patients (average age 50.4 years) who underwent CO2 laser stapedotomy. Intra-operative, postoperative outcomes and audiological results were investigated.
RESULTS: The average surgical time of laser CO2 surgery was longer than for other surgical procedures. No statistical differences emerged in post-operative abnormal taste sensation. There was also no difference in postoperative dizziness. Air-bone gap (ABG) went down from 29.7 ± 10 dB (group 1) and 27.32 ± 9.20 (group 2) to 10 ± 6.9 dB (group 1) and 10.7 ± 6.03 dB (group 2). In group 3 the preoperative ABG was lowered from 28.3 ± 10.1 to 11.8 ± 10.9, with a statistical difference in auditory recovery (p = 0.0001); The group of patients treated with laser CO2 showed a percentage of patients with an ABG closure of between 0 and 10 dB higher than in the group treated with manual microdrills (77.2% vs. 60%, respectively; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Overall surgical results of CO2 laser and conventional stapedotomy are comparable without any significant difference; however, the group treated with CO2 laser appears to have a percentage of patients with an ABG closure 0-10 dB higher than the group treated using the conventional technique.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser stapedotomy; Laser stapes surgery; Otosclerosis; Stapedotomy; Stapes; Stapes surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34115200     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06926-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  1 in total

1.  A comparison of CO2 laser versus traditional stapedectomy outcomes.

Authors:  S Ryan; M A Thornton; S Kieran; D Charles
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.