Literature DB >> 34115103

Efficacy of venetoclax plus rituximab for relapsed CLL: 5-year follow-up of continuous or limited- duration therapy.

Shuo Ma1, John F Seymour2,3, Danielle M Brander4, Thomas J Kipps5, Michael Y Choi5, Mary Ann Anderson2,3,6, Kathryn Humphrey7, Abdullah Al Masud8, John Pesko8, Ruby Nandam8, Ahmed Hamed Salem8,9, Brenda Chyla8, Jennifer Arzt8, Amanda Jacobson8, Su Young Kim8, Andrew W Roberts2,3,6.   

Abstract

We report long-term follow-up of the phase 1b study of venetoclax and rituximab (VenR) in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including outcomes with continuous or limited-duration therapy. Patients received venetoclax daily (200-600 mg) and rituximab over 6 months and then received venetoclax monotherapy. Patients achieving complete response (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), or undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) assessed by flow cytometry (<10-4 cutoff) were allowed, but not required, to discontinue therapy, while remaining in the study and could be retreated with VenR upon progression. Median follow-up for all patients (N = 49) was 5.3 years. Five-year rates (95% CI) for overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response were 86% (72-94), 56% (40-70), and 58% (40-73), respectively. Of the 33 deep responders (CR/CRi or uMRD), 14 remained on venetoclax monotherapy (continuous therapy), and 19 stopped venetoclax therapy (limited-duration therapy) after a median of 1.4 years. Five-year estimates of ongoing response were similar between continuous (71%; 95% CI, 39-88) or limited-duration therapy (79% [49-93]). Six of 19 patients in the latter group had subsequent disease progression, all >2 years off venetoclax (range, 2.1-6.4). Four patients were retreated with VenR, with partial responses observed in the 3 evaluable to date. VenR induced deep responses that were highly durable with either continuous or limited-duration therapy. Retreatment with VenR induced responses in patients with CLL progression after discontinuing therapy. Continuous exposure to venetoclax in deep responders does not appear to provide incremental benefit.
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34115103     DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020009578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   25.476


  6 in total

1.  Upfront therapy: the case for continuous treatment.

Authors:  Constantine S Tam
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  The BCL2 Inhibitor Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Is Active in MYD88 Wild-Type Polyneuropathy With Anti-MAG Antibodies.

Authors:  Chiara Briani; Andrea Visentin; Francesca Castellani; Mario Cacciavillani; Livio Trentin
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  Clinical experiences with venetoclax and other pro-apoptotic agents in lymphoid malignancies: lessons from monotherapy and chemotherapy combination.

Authors:  Thomas E Lew; John F Seymour
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 23.168

4.  Is BTKi or BCL2i preferable as first novel therapy in patients with CLL? The case for BCL2i.

Authors:  John F Seymour
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-02-22

5.  Trends in Disease Burden of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia at the Global, Regional, and National Levels From 1990 to 2019, and Projections Until 2030: A Population-Based Epidemiologic Study.

Authors:  Yang Ou; Yichen Long; Lili Ji; Yanxia Zhan; Tiankui Qiao; Xiangdong Wang; Hao Chen; Yunfeng Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  The Difficult-to-Treat del 17 p Patient-A Case Report in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Moldovianu; Ana Manuela Crisan; Zsofia Varady; Daniel Coriu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.