| Literature DB >> 34113908 |
Juan Torrado1,2, Gurukripa N Kowlgi1, Rafael J Ramirez1,3, Jaime Balderas-Villalobos1,3, Daniel Jovin2, Chandler Parker2, Evani Om1,3, Sergei Airapetov1,2, Karoly Kaszala1,2, Alex Y Tan1,2, Kenneth A Ellenbogen1, Jose F Huizar1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tachycardia and heart rate irregularity are proposed triggers of premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-cardiomyopathy). Bigeminal premature atrial and ventricular contractions (PACs and PVCs) increase heart rate and result in rhythm irregularities but differ in their effects on ventricular synchrony. Comparing chronic bigeminal PACs with PVCs would provide insights into mechanisms of PVC-cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiomyopathy; Eccentric hypertrophy; Heart rate irregularity; LV dyssynchrony; Premature atrial contraction; Premature ventricular contraction; Tachycardia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34113908 PMCID: PMC8183810 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.12.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 ISSN: 2666-5018
Figure 1Experimental design and study protocol. Animal randomization into sham, premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) groups for 12-week period and 4 additional animals exposed to a 48-week PVC period. RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle.
Figure 2Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and geometry between study groups during the 12-week protocol. Progression of (A) LVEF, (B) LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), (C) LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), (D) relative wall thickness (RWT), and (E) LV mass index during 12 weeks of follow-up in sham, premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) groups (mean ± standard error of the mean). Boxes next to individual values represent the median + interquartile range; P < .05 (∗) vs sham, (†) vs PAC, (‡) vs baseline, (§) vs week 4.
Figure 3Effect of long-term premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and geometry. Progression of (A) LVEF, (B) LV end-diastolic (LVEDV) and (C) end-systolic volumes (LVESV), (D) LV mass index, and (E) relative wall thickness (RWT) after a long-term exposure to bigeminal PVCs (n = 4, 48-week follow-up). Solid lines represent each individual animal. Red dashed line represents mean value. (‡) P < .05 vs baseline.
Figure 4Left ventricular (LV) mass index and classic “LV remodeling diagram.” A: Progression of LV mass index throughout the 12-week protocol in sham, premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) groups (mean ± standard error of the mean). B: Individual relative wall thickness (RWT) vs LV mass index is plotted in “LV remodeling diagram” to better describe the LV geometric hypertrophic phenotype associated with our model of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. Dashed lines represent the 95th percentile threshold (P95) for each variable calculated from baseline values for all animals (n = 31), indicating 2 different thresholds (in the y and x axes) for RWT and LV mass index, respectively.P < .05 (∗) vs sham, (†) vs PAC, (‡) vs baseline, (§) vs week 4. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3.
Figure 5Changes in left ventricular (LV) pressure by different study groups. Hemodynamic changes in (A) LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), (B) LV end-systolic pressure (LVESP), (C) LV contractility (max dP/dt), and (D) lusitropy (min dP/dt) in sham, premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) groups at baseline and after 12 weeks. Maximum LV dP/dt decreased over the 12-week period in the PVC group, indicating decreased contractility during isovolumetric contraction (inotropy), while minimum LV dP/dt significantly decreased from baseline in the PVC group, suggestive of impaired relaxation (lusitropy). Boxes next to individual values represent the median + interquartile range. P < .05 (‡) vs baseline. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.