| Literature DB >> 34113310 |
Hubert Lee1,2, Ayman M Qureshi1,3, Nils H Mueller-Kronast4, Osama O Zaidat5, Michael T Froehler6, David S Liebeskind7, Vitor M Pereira1,8.
Abstract
Background: The indications for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke continue to broaden, leading neurointerventionalists to treat vessel occlusions at increasingly distal locations farther in time from stroke onset. Accessing these smaller vessels raises the concern of iatrogenic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) owing to increasing complexity in device navigation and retrieval. This study aims to determine the prevalence of SAH following mechanical thrombectomy, associated predictors, and resulting functional outcomes using a multicenter registry and compare this with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.Entities:
Keywords: direct aspiration; endovascular therapy; ischemic stroke; large vessel occlusion; stent retriever; subarachnoid hemorrhage; thrombectomy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34113310 PMCID: PMC8185211 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.663058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1PRISMA flow diagram of study identification and selection. *For the RCT by Saver et al.—SWIFT, only one treatment arm (Solitaire stent retriever) was used.
Clinical, radiographic, and procedural characteristics in STRATIS (N = 841).
| Age (years) | 68.1 ± 15.0 [797] 69.6 (59.3–79.7) | 70.3 ± 14.2 [44] 68.0 (61.4–81.7) | 0.342 |
| Female | 46% (366/797) | 55% (24/44) | 0.264 |
| Hypertension | 73% (581/797) | 70% (31/44) | 0.723 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 25% (202/797) | 39% (17/44) | 0.050 |
| Coronary artery disease | 27% (216/797) | 30% (13/44) | 0.723 |
| Smoking | 0.650 | ||
| Current | 21% (167/797) | 25% (11/44) | |
| Former | 26% (210/797) | 18% (8/44) | |
| Never | 43% (342/797) | 48% (21/44) | |
| Unknown | 10% (78/797) | 9% (4/44) | |
| Baseline NIHSS | 17.3 ± 5.5 [797] 17.0 (13.0–22.0) | 17.3 ± 5.8 [44] 16.0 (13.0–22.5) | 0.983 |
| ASPECTS | 8.2 ± 1.6 [699] 8.0 (8.0–9.0) | 8.1 ± 1.9 [40] 9.0 (7.5–9.0) | 0.849 |
| IV t-PA Use | 66% (528/796) | 48% (21/44) | 0.012 |
| 0.018 | |||
| ICA terminus | 23% (181/790) | 11% (5/44) | |
| MCA (M1) | 56% (443/790) | 52% (23/44) | |
| MCA (M2) | 16% (125/790) | 36% (16/44) | |
| MCA (M3) | 0% (2/790) | 0% (0/44) | |
| Vertebral artery | 0% (1/790) | 0% (0/44) | |
| Basilar artery | 5% (36/790) | 0% (0/44) | |
| PCA | 0% (2/790) | 0% (0/44) | |
| General anesthesia | 33% (234/703) | 40% (16/40) | 0.382 |
| Number of passes | 0.021 | ||
| ≤ 3 | 90% (714/790) | 80% (35/44) | |
| >3 | 10% (76/790) | 20% (9/44) | |
| Rescue therapy | 11% (85/790) | 16% (7/44) | 0.289 |
| Procedure time (minutes) | 64.4 ± 36.9 [777] 56.0 (38.0–81.0) | 78.4 ± 39.3 [44] 75.0 (51.5–93.5) | 0.015 |
NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; IV-tPA, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator; ICA, internal carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery.
Predictors of post-thrombectomy SAH—multivariate logistic regression for anterior circulation vessel occlusions.
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.85 | (0.99, 3.47) | 0.054 | – | – | – |
| Location of vessel occlusion: proximal vs. distal | 2.81 | (1.48, 5.34) | 0.002 | 3.18 | (1.63, 6.18) | <0.001 |
| IV t-PA Use | 0.46 | (0.25, 0.85) | 0.013 | 0.46 | (0.25, 0.85) | 0.014 |
| Number of passes | 1.27 | (1.04, 1.55) | 0.017 | 1.34 | (1.09, 1.64) | 0.005 |
| Procedure Time (10 min) | 1.08 | (1.02, 1.16) | 0.016 | – | – | – |
Variables no longer significant following multivariate logistic regression are denoted by “–”. IV-tPA, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Only anterior circulation vessel occlusions were included comparing internal carotid artery terminus and middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 (proximal) to MCA M2 and M3 (distal).
Predictors of post-thrombectomy SAH—multivariate logistic regression for anterior and posterior circulation vessel occlusions.
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.85 | (0.99, 3.47) | 0.054 | – | – | – |
| Location of vessel occlusion: proximal vs. distal | 2.97 | (1.56, 5.66) | <0.001 | 3.41 | (1.75, 6.63) | <0.001 |
| IV t-PA Use | 0.46 | (0.25, 0.85) | 0.013 | 0.48 | (0.26, 0.89) | 0.020 |
| Number of passes | 1.27 | (1.04, 1.55) | 0.017 | 1.34 | (1.09, 1.64) | 0.005 |
| Procedure Time (10 min) | 1.08 | (1.02, 1.16) | 0.016 | – | – | – |
Variables no longer significant following multivariate logistic regression are denoted by “-”. IV-tPA, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Comparison of proximal (internal carotid artery terminus, middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1, vertebral artery, basilar artery) to distal (MCA M2 and M3) vessel occlusions.
Procedural and functional outcomes in STRATIS.
| Final reperfusion (TICI 2b/3) | 93% (732/788) | 91% (40/44) | 0.620 |
| NIHSS at discharge | 5.3 ± 6.6 [620] | 8.3 ± 8.7 [31] | 0.070 |
| mRS at 90 days | 0.018 | ||
| 0 | 21% (157/737) | 15% (6/40) | |
| 1 | 23% (168/737) | 8% (3/40) | |
| 2 | 14% (101/737) | 10% (4/40) | |
| 3 | 13% (96/737) | 20% (8/40) | |
| 4 | 10% (76/737) | 8% (3/40) | |
| 5 | 4% (32/737) | 10% (4/40) | |
| 6 | 15% (107/737) | 30% (12/40) | |
| mRS 0-1 at 90 days | 44% (325/737) | 23% (9/40) | 0.007 |
| mRS 0-2 at 90 days | 58% (426/737) | 33% (13/40) | 0.002 |
| Neurological deterioration | 8% (55/708) | 18% (7/38) | 0.020 |
| Parenchymal hemorrhage (HBC 1c + 2) | 3% (22/797) | 7% (3/44) | 0.123 |
| Remote intraparenchymal hemorrhage (HBC 3a) | 0.1% (1/797) | 0.0% (0/44) | 0.814 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage (HBC 3b) | 0.0% (0/797) | 2.3% (1/44) | <0.001 |
TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; HBC, Heidelberg Bleeding Classification.
≥ 4 point worsening in NIHSS.
Equivalent to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III PH1 and PH2.
Figure 2Pooled prevalence of subarachnoid hemorrhage following mechanical thrombectomy.
Figure 3Effect of anterior vs. posterior circulation vessel occlusion on subarachnoid hemorrhage following mechanical thrombectomy.
Figure 4Effect of proximal vs. distal vessel occlusion on subarachnoid hemorrhage following mechanical thrombectomy.
Figure 5Effect of IV tPA administration on subarachnoid hemorrhage following mechanical thrombectomy.
Figure 6Effect of direct aspiration vs. stent retriever use on subarachnoid hemorrhage following mechanical thrombectomy.