| Literature DB >> 34113073 |
Noriko Himori1, Maki Inoue Yanagimachi1, Kazuko Omodaka1,2, Yukihiro Shiga1, Satoru Tsuda1, Hiroshi Kunikata1,3, Toru Nakazawa1,2,3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oxidative stress may be a risk factor for glaucoma, and many previous reports have suggested that antioxidants could be a promising treatment. Here, we investigated the effects of a novel supplement containing three food-derived antioxidants (hesperidin, crocetin, and Tamarindus indica) on markers of oxidative stress in patients with glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study had a prospective, single arm design. Thirty Japanese glaucoma patients were recruited and given 4 tablets with ample water twice a day for 8 weeks. The treatment was stopped, and the subjects were followed for an additional 8 weeks. We measured biological antioxidant potential (BAP) with a free radical analyzer. We also measured urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG; a marker of oxidative DNA damage). Clinical laboratory data were measured in venous blood samples. Clinical parameters were also recorded. Comparisons used a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test.Entities:
Keywords: 8-OHdG; glaucoma; oxidative stress; supplement
Year: 2021 PMID: 34113073 PMCID: PMC8183457 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S314288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Figure 1Overview of study design.
Characteristics of Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients
| Demographics | All | 8-OHdG < 6.86 (ng/mg Creatinine) | 8-OHdG > 6.86 (ng/mg Creatinine) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 30 | 19 | 11 | – |
| Age (years) | 59.1± 9.0 | 60.7 ± 8.5 | 56.3 ± 9.6 | 0.23 |
| Sex (male: female) | 15: 15 | 10: 9 | 5: 6 | 1.00* |
| Visual acuity (logMAR) | 0.11 ± 0.37 | 0.01 ± 0.30 | 0.08 ± 0.34 | 0.28 |
| IOP (mmHg) | 11.03 ± 2.25 | 11.48 ± 1.87 | 11.58 ± 1.97 | 0.94 |
| Mean deviation (dB) | −14.24 ± 6.58 | −15.20 ± 6.36 | −12.89 ± 6.99 | 0.49 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.34 ± 2.15 | 23.14 ±1.59 | 20.95 ± 2.35 | 0.02 |
| 8-OHdG (ng/mg creatinine) | 6.86 ± 3.52 | 4.69 ± 1.41 | 10.59 ± 2.88 | < 0.01 |
| BAP (μmol/L) | 2022.37 ± 139.94 | 2039.56 ± 110.53 | 1992.64 ± 182.40 | 0.64 |
| Diabetes (%) | 1 (3.33) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (9.09) | 0.37* |
| Hypertension (%) | 4 (13.33) | 4 (21.05) | 0 (0.00) | 0.27* |
| Current smoker (%) | 6 (20.00) | 3 (15.79) | 3 (27.27) | 0.64* |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 6 (20.00) | 5 (26.32) | 1 (9.09) | 0.37* |
Notes: Unmarked P values: Mann–Whitney U-test; *Fisher exact test.
Abbreviations: 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2ʹ-deoxyguanosine; logMAR, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; IOP, intraocular pressure; BMI, body mass index; BAP, biological antioxidant potential.
Figure 2Comparison of findings before and after antioxidant treatment in patients with glaucoma. (A) There was no significant increase in 8-OHdG level. (B) BAP level significantly increased at weeks 8 and 16. *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Comparison of findings before and after antioxidant treatment in patients with relatively high or low oxidative stress. (A) There was a significant increase in the 8-OHdG level at weeks 12 and 16 in patients with relatively low oxidative stress. (B) There was a significant decrease in 8-OHdG level at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 in patients with relatively high oxidative stress. (C) BAP level did not significantly change before and after treatment in patients with relatively low oxidative stress. (D) BAP level significantly increased at weeks 8 and 12 in patients with relatively high oxidative stress. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.