Literature DB >> 34112836

The short-term safety and efficacy of TANDEM microspheres of various sizes and doxorubicin loading concentrations for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

Chia-Ying Lin1, Yi-Sheng Liu1, Kuang-Tse Pan2, Chia-Bang Chen3, Chein-Fu Hung4, Chen-Te Chou5,6,7.   

Abstract

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is the most common treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effect of drug loading concentration and microsphere size on treatment outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective study compares the outcomes of 87 HCC patients who underwent DEB-TACE with half-loaded or full-loaded doxorubicin (maximum capacity 50 mg/mL) in 75-µm or 100-µm microspheres. Treatment with 100-μm microspheres resulted in significantly lower rates of procedure-related complications (6.6% vs. 26.9%; P < 0.05), post-embolization syndrome (32.8% vs. 61.5%, P < 0.05), SIR complications (32.8% vs. 61.5%; P < 0.01) and adverse events involving abdominal pain (19.7% vs. 42.3%; P < 0.05). Half-load doxorubicin microspheres resulted in greater treatment response (OR, 4.00; 95% CI 1.06-15.13; P, 0.041) and shorter hospital stays (OR, - 1.72; 95% CI - 2.77-0.68; P, 0.001) than did microspheres loaded to full capacity. Stratified analysis further showed that patients treated with 100-μm half-load doxorubicin microspheres had a higher CR (63.6% vs 18.0%) and ORR (90.9 vs 54.0%) and a shorter hospital stay (1.6 ± 1.3 vs 4.2 ± 2.3 days) than did those treated with full-load microspheres (P < 0.05). Thus, the drug-loading concentration of microspheres in DEB-TACE should be carefully considered.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34112836     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91021-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  43 in total

1.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors:  J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Liver Cancer Cell of Origin, Molecular Class, and Effects on Patient Prognosis.

Authors:  Daniela Sia; Augusto Villanueva; Scott L Friedman; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chung-Mau Lo; Henry Ngan; Wai-Kuen Tso; Chi-Leung Liu; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Sheung-Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Margarita Sala; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Best Practice and Future Direction.

Authors:  Fasiha Kanwal; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Therapeutic Potential of Berberine in the Treatment of Glioma: Insights into Its Regulatory Mechanisms.

Authors:  Zatollah Asemi; Mohammad Behnam; Mohammad Ali Pourattar; Hamed Mirzaei; Zahra Sadat Razavi; Omid Reza Tamtaji
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 7.  A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management.

Authors:  Ju Dong Yang; Pierre Hainaut; Gregory J Gores; Amina Amadou; Amelie Plymoth; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 73.082

Review 8.  Conventional vs drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong Eun Song; Do Young Kim
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-28

9.  Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Roman Kloeckner; Arndt Weinmann; Friederike Prinz; Daniel Pinto dos Santos; Christian Ruckes; Christoph Dueber; Michael Bernhard Pitton
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current state of the art.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Limitations and Possibilities of Transarterial Chemotherapeutic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Charlotte Ebeling Barbier; Femke Heindryckx; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  LINC01419 Promotes the Proliferation of Hepatoma Cells by Recruiting XRCC5 and Regulating Its Phosphorylation to Repair DNA Damage.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Xu Zhang; Qiang Fu; ChuanJiang Liu; QianKun Luo; PengFei Yu; Song Chen; HongWei Zhang; Tao Qin
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.