Literature DB >> 34112820

In-situ remediation of nitrogen and phosphorus of beverage industry by potential strains Bacillus sp. (BK1) and Aspergillus sp. (BK2).

Anne Bhambri1,2, Santosh Kumar Karn3, R K Singh1.   

Abstract

The bioremediation of beverage (treated and untreated) effluent was investigated in the current study by using the potential strains of Bacillus sp. (BK1) and Aspergillus sp. (BK2). Effluent was collected from the beverage industry (initial concentration of nitrogen were 3200 ± 0.5 mg/L and 4400 ± 0.6 mg/L whereas phosphorus were 4400 ± 2 mg/L and 2600 ± 1 mg/L in treated and untreated effluent correspondingly). Further, the BK1 and BK2 exhibited high removal competence after 1 week of incubation; BK1 removed phosphorus 99.95 ± 0.7% and BK2 95.69 ± 1% in treated effluent while nitrogen removed about 99.90 ± 0.4% by BK1 and 81.25 ± 0.8% by BK2 (initial concentration of phosphorus 4400 ± 2 mg/L and nitrogen 3200 ± 0.5 mg/L). Next, in the untreated effluent BK1 removed 99.81 ± 1% and BK2 99.85 ± 0.8% of phosphorus while removed nitrogen 99.93 ± 0.5% by BK1 and 99.95 ± 1.2% by BK2 correspondingly, (initial concentration of phosphorus 2600 ± 1 mg/L and nitrogen 4400 ± 0.6 mg/L). The physiochemical composition of sample such as pH, total carbohydrates, total proteins, total solids of treated and untreated effluent were also analysed before and after treatment of both the samples. BK1 and BK2 increased the pH by 8.94 ± 0.3 and 9.5 ± 0.4 correspondingly in treated effluent whereas 6.34 ± 0.5 and 7.5 ± 0.2 correspondingly in untreated effluent (initial pH of treated and untreated effluent 7.07 ± 0.8 and 4.85 ± 0.3 correspondingly). Total Carbohydrates removed about 17,440 ± 4.6 mg/L and 10,680 ± 3.2 mg/L by BK1 and BK2 correspondingly in treated effluent whereas 18,050 ± 3.5 mg/L and 18,340 ± 2.3 mg/L correspondingly in untreated effluent (initial concentration of treated and untreated effluent 25,780 ± 1.6 mg/L and 35,000 ± 1.5 mg/L correspondingly) while BK1 and BK2 removed total proteins by 30.336 ± 4.6 mg/L and 40.417 ± 2.3 mg/L correspondingly in treated effluent whereas 18.929 ± 1.2 mg/L and 17.526 ± 0.8 mg/L correspondingly in untreated effluent (initial concentration of treated and untreated effluent 49.225 ± 1.5 mg/L and 20.565 ± 1 mg/L correspondingly). Next, total solids removed by BK1 and BK2 2.5 ± 0.3 mg/L and 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/L correspondingly in treated effluent whereas 5.5 ± 0.8 mg/L and 4.6 ± 0.6 mg/L in untreated effluent (initial concentration of treated and untreated effluent 5.6 ± 1.5 mg/L and 9.48 ± 1.2 mg/L correspondingly). Both the strains BK1 and BK2 are highly efficient in the nitrogen and phosphorus removal therefore this strain may be applied for the potential remediation.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34112820     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91539-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  38 in total

1.  Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  V H Smith; G D Tilman; J C Nekola
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphate removal in aerobic granular sludge reactors operated at different temperatures.

Authors:  J P Bassin; R Kleerebezem; M Dezotti; M C M van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Process optimization of anammox-driven hydroxyapatite crystallization for simultaneous nitrogen removal and phosphorus recovery.

Authors:  Lan Lin; Yanlong Zhang; Markus Beckman; Wenzhi Cao; Tong Ouyang; Shaopo Wang; Yu-You Li
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Evaluation of a hybrid ion exchange-catalyst treatment technology for nitrate removal from drinking water.

Authors:  Allison M Bergquist; Jong Kwon Choe; Timothy J Strathmann; Charles J Werth
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Cost-effective bioregeneration of nitrate-laden ion exchange brine through deliberate bicarbonate incorporation.

Authors:  Qi Li; Bin Huang; Xin Chen; Yi Shi
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Infant methemoglobinemia: the role of dietary nitrate in food and water.

Authors:  Frank R Greer; Michael Shannon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Simultaneous removal of ammonia, P and COD from anaerobically digested piggery wastewater using an integrated process of chemical precipitation and air stripping.

Authors:  Xuejun Quan; Changying Ye; Yanqi Xiong; Jinxin Xiang; Fuping Wang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Nitrate decontamination through functionalized chitosan in brackish water.

Authors:  Sowmya Appunni; Mathur P Rajesh; Sivaraman Prabhakar
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 9.381

9.  Nutrient removal by NF and RO membranes in a decentralized sanitation system.

Authors:  Ellen M van Voorthuizen; Arie Zwijnenburg; Matthias Wessling
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Chemical reduction of nitrate by nanosized iron: kinetics and pathways.

Authors:  Gordon C C Yang; Hsaio-Lan Lee
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 11.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.