OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess 30-day outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip XTR for significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), relative to baseline coaptation gap sizes (CGS). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip NT for patients with significant TR is safe and efficacious; the utility of the MitraClip XTR is unknown. METHODS: Patients with significant, symptomatic TR treated at a single site between April 2018 and December 2019, with consent and with complete data, were included (n = 50). Baseline and 30-day echocardiograms were assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups on the basis of site-assessed CGS: subgroup I (< 7 mm), subgroup II (7 to 10 mm), and subgroup III (>10 mm). RESULTS: Technical success of the MitraClip XTR implantation was 100% (88% in the septal-anterior position) using a median of 2 clips (interquartile range: 1 to 2). At 30 days, single-leaflet detachment was noted in 3 patients (6%), with no instances of device embolization. TR was reduced by 1 grade in subgroup I and by 2 grades in subgroups II and III. New York Heart Association functional class was reduced by 1 class in all 3 subgroups. The 6-min walk distance increased in subgroup I (+115 m; p = 0.014) and subgroup II (+31.5 m; p = 0.028) but not subgroup III (+50 m; p = 0.999). A CGS of ≤8.4 mm was predictive of a reduction to moderate or less TR. CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip XTR implantation is a safe, effective treatment for a wider range of CGS in patients with symptomatic, significant TR than prior device iterations. All patients showed improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, and those with CGS <10 mm also experienced improved functional capacity.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess 30-day outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip XTR for significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), relative to baseline coaptation gap sizes (CGS). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip NT for patients with significant TR is safe and efficacious; the utility of the MitraClip XTR is unknown. METHODS:Patients with significant, symptomatic TR treated at a single site between April 2018 and December 2019, with consent and with complete data, were included (n = 50). Baseline and 30-day echocardiograms were assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups on the basis of site-assessed CGS: subgroup I (< 7 mm), subgroup II (7 to 10 mm), and subgroup III (>10 mm). RESULTS: Technical success of the MitraClip XTR implantation was 100% (88% in the septal-anterior position) using a median of 2 clips (interquartile range: 1 to 2). At 30 days, single-leaflet detachment was noted in 3 patients (6%), with no instances of device embolization. TR was reduced by 1 grade in subgroup I and by 2 grades in subgroups II and III. New York Heart Association functional class was reduced by 1 class in all 3 subgroups. The 6-min walk distance increased in subgroup I (+115 m; p = 0.014) and subgroup II (+31.5 m; p = 0.028) but not subgroup III (+50 m; p = 0.999). A CGS of ≤8.4 mm was predictive of a reduction to moderate or less TR. CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip XTR implantation is a safe, effective treatment for a wider range of CGS in patients with symptomatic, significant TR than prior device iterations. All patients showed improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, and those with CGS <10 mm also experienced improved functional capacity.
Authors: Anna Sannino; Federica Ilardi; Rebecca T Hahn; Patrizio Lancellotti; Philipp Lurz; Robert L Smith; Giovanni Esposito; Paul A Grayburn Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-11
Authors: Alberto Alperi; Marcel Almendárez; Rut Álvarez; Cesar Moris; Victor Leon; Iria Silva; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Isaac Pascual; Pablo Avanzas Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-14