| Literature DB >> 34111919 |
Su-Hyeon Kim1, Heeil Do1, Gyeongjun Cho1, Da-Ran Kim2, Youn-Sig Kwak1,2.
Abstract
Pollination is an essential process for plants to carry on their generation. Pollination is carried out in various ways depending on the type of plant species. Among them, pollination by insect pollinator accounts for the most common. However, these pollinators have be decreasing in population density due to environmental factors. Therefore, use of artificial pollination is increasing. However, there is a lack of information on microorganisms present in the artificial pollens. We showed the composition of bacteria structure present in the artificial pollens of apple, kiwifruit, peach and pear, and contamination of high-risk pathogens was investigated. Acidovorax spp., Pantoea spp., Erwinia spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Xanthomonas spp., which are classified as potential high-risk pathogens, have been identified in imported pollens. This study presented the pollen-associated bacterial community structure, and the results are expected to be foundation for strengthening biosecurity in orchard industry.Entities:
Keywords: artificial pollination; biosecurity; high-risk pathogen; pollen-associated microbiota
Year: 2021 PMID: 34111919 PMCID: PMC8200575 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.02.2021.0029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
Fig. 1.Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) plot for bacterial communities. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used as an asymmetrical measure for NMDS plot. Multiple variables and species, operational taxonomic units, were represented by NMDS plots as condensed information through two-dimensional coordinates. Pollen microbial structure with significant differences were formed by the separation of coordinates as beta-dispersion (*P < 0.05). Points represent each pollen sample. The red, green, blue, and purple circles mean coordinates of the points representing the samples by each apple, kiwifruit, peach, and pear pollen.
Top 10 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of each pollen at family level
| Imported year | Apple | Kiwifruit | Peach | Pear | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxonomy | Abundance (%) | OTU | Taxonomy | Abundance (%) | OTU | Taxonomy | Abundance (%) | OTU | Taxonomy | Abundance (%) | OTU | |
| 2018 | Enterobacteriaceae | 12.43 | OTU3 | Enterobacteriaceae | 23.15 | OTU4 | Leuconostocaceae | 32.53 | OTU1 | Leuconostocaceae | 32.89 | OTU1 |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 9.78 | OTU14 | Moraxellaceae | 11.01 | OTU7 | Micrococcaceae | 8.21 | OTU10 | Leuconostocaceae | 10.38 | OTU6 | |
| Propionibacteriaceae | 7.51 | OTU9 | Enterobacteriaceae | 9.27 | OTU12 | Leuconostocaceae | 7.83 | OTU6 | Micrococcaceae | 10.04 | OTU10 | |
| Pseudonocardiaceae | 7.28 | OTU17 | Enterobacteriaceae | 8.06 | OTU5 | Enterobacteriaceae | 5.72 | OTU4 | Enterobacteriaceae | 4.50 | OTU5 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 5.82 | OTU4 | Aerococcaceae | 5.91 | OTU22 | Enterobacteriaceae | 5.28 | OTU5 | Enterobacteriaceae | 3.69 | OTU4 | |
| Burkholderiaceae | 4.34 | OTU33 | Moraxellaceae | 3.38 | OTU21 | Not assigned | 2.73 | OTU48 | Pseudomonadaceae | 3.13 | OTU37 | |
| Micrococcaceae | 3.92 | OTU10 | Moraxellaceae | 3.20 | OTU25 | Leuconostocaceae | 2.26 | OTU19 | Enterobacteriaceae | 2.39 | OTU3 | |
| Pirellulaceae | 3.91 | OTU44 | Staphylococcaceae | 2.73 | OTU8 | Enterobacteriaceae | 2.23 | OTU15 | Pseudomonadaceae | 2.36 | OTU43 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 3.02 | OTU5 | Moraxellaceae | 2.28 | OTU18 | Enterobacteriaceae | 2.08 | OTU20 | Pseudomonadaceae | 1.89 | OTU16 | |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 2.15 | OTU58 | Staphylococcaceae | 2.28 | OTU61 | Leuconostocaceae | 1.22 | OTU66 | Pseudomonadaceae | 1.73 | OTU40 | |
| 2019 | Burkholderiaceae | 40.66 | OTU2 | Moraxellaceae | 12.77 | OTU7 | Burkholderiaceae | 16.62 | OTU2 | Leuconostocaceae | 39.60 | OTU1 |
| Staphylococcaceae | 13.20 | OTU8 | Burkholderiaceae | 10.31 | OTU2 | Leuconostocaceae | 12.69 | OTU1 | Enterobacteriaceae | 9.72 | OTU3 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 11.37 | OTU3 | Enterobacteriaceae | 4.98 | OTU12 | Enterobacteriaceae | 10.38 | OTU3 | Moraxellaceae | 8.53 | OTU13 | |
| Leuconostocaceae | 6.68 | OTU1 | Moraxellaceae | 4.37 | OTU18 | Moraxellaceae | 5.23 | OTU13 | Enterobacteriaceae | 6.77 | OTU5 | |
| Burkholderiaceae | 6.44 | OTU11 | Enterobacteriaceae | 3.38 | OTU5 | Propionibacteriaceae | 4.54 | OTU9 | Leuconostocaceae | 6.63 | OTU6 | |
| Propionibacteriaceae | 6.06 | OTU9 | Xanthomonadaceae | 3.10 | OTU23 | Leuconostocaceae | 4.41 | OTU27 | Burkholderiaceae | 3.74 | OTU2 | |
| Microbacteriaceae | 3.70 | OTU24 | Staphylococcaceae | 3.01 | OTU34 | Enterobacteriaceae | 4.05 | OTU4 | Pseudomonadaceae | 2.61 | OTU64 | |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 2.71 | OTU38 | Xanthomonadaceae | 2.85 | OTU39 | Bacillaceae | 3.75 | OTU36 | Enterobacteriaceae | 2.03 | OTU32 | |
| Rhizobiaceae | 1.83 | OTU47 | Propionibacteriaceae | 2.84 | OTU9 | Crocinitomicaceae | 3.12 | OTU35 | Enterobacteriaceae | 1.97 | OTU4 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 1.75 | OTU4 | Enterobacteriaceae | 2.81 | OTU4 | Burkholderiaceae | 2.70 | OTU11 | Pseudomonadaceae | 1.79 | OTU49 | |
Fig. 2.Hierarchical structure of taxonomic classifications with the abundance of each pollen bacteria. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) abundance was displayed depending on the color and size of the nodes (A, apple; B, kiwifruit; C, peach; D, pear). Comparison of pollen sample for the abundance was visualized by metacoder R.
Fig. 3.Phylogenetic tree presents the relationship between identified operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the pollens and the high-risk pathogens: aligned with Acidovorax spp. (A), aligned with Erwinia spp. (B), aligned with Pantoea spp. (C), aligned with Pseudomonas spp. (D), and aligned with Xanthomonas spp.) (E). The phylogenetic trees were constructed by MEGA X using maximum likelihood algorithm.