Literature DB >> 34111855

Filtering-induced time shifts in photoplethysmography pulse features measured at different body sites: the importance of filter definition and standardization.

Haipeng Liu1, John Allen1, Syed Ghufran Khalid1, Fei Chen2, Dingchang Zheng3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Filtering can change the timing of pulse feature points on photoplethysmography (PPG) signals. We aim to quantitatively investigate the effect of measurement site and type of pulse feature on the filtering-induced time shift (TS). APPROACH: 60-second PPG signals were measured from six body sites [finger, wrist under (volar), wrist upper (dorsal), earlobe, and forehead] of 36 healthy adults. Using infinite impulse response digital filters, PPG signals were prefiltered (band-pass, pass and stop bands: >0.5Hz and <0.2Hz for high-pass filter, <20Hz and >30Hz for low-pass filter) then filtered (low-pass, pass and stop bands: <3Hz and >5Hz). Four pulse features (peak, valley, maximal first derivative, and maximal second derivative) were extracted. For each subject, overall TS and intra-subject TS variability in feature points were calculated as the mean and standard deviation of TS between prefiltered and filtered PPG signals in 50 cardiac cycles. Statistical test was performed to investigate the effect of measurement site and type of pulse feature on overall TS and intra-subject TS variability.
RESULTS: Measurement site, type of pulse feature, and their interaction had significant impacts on the overall TS and intra-subject TS variability (p<0.001 for all). Valley and maximal second derivative showed higher overall TS than peak and maximal first derivative. Finger has higher overall TS and lower intra-subject TS variability than other measurement sites. SIGNIFICANCE: Measurement site and type of pulse feature can significantly influence the timing of feature point on filtered PPG signals. Filtering parameters should be quoted to support the reproducibility of PPG-related studies.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Keywords:  feature point; filtering; multi-site photoplethysmography (PPG); pulse wave; time shift

Year:  2021        PMID: 34111855     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac0a34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  4 in total

1.  Establishing best practices in photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing.

Authors:  Peter H Charlton; Kristjan Pilt; Panicos A Kyriacou
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  PPG EduKit: An Adjustable Photoplethysmography Evaluation System for Educational Activities.

Authors:  Ángel Solé Morillo; Joan Lambert Cause; Vlad-Eusebiu Baciu; Bruno da Silva; Juan C Garcia-Naranjo; Johan Stiens
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring and Prediction Using a Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Siti Nor Ashikin Ismail; Nazrul Anuar Nayan; Rosmina Jaafar; Zazilah May
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Photoplethysmography temporal marker-based machine learning classifier for anesthesia drug detection.

Authors:  Syed Ghufran Khalid; Syed Mehmood Ali; Haipeng Liu; Aisha Ghazal Qurashi; Uzma Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.