Literature DB >> 3411025

Evidence for different types of mechanoreceptors from measurements of the psychophysical threshold for vibrations under different stimulation conditions.

P J Lamoré1, C J Keemink.   

Abstract

The shape of the psychophysical frequency threshold curve for vibrations presented to the skin in the frequency region 5-1000 Hz is strongly dependent on the static force that the vibrator exerts on the skin and on whether there is a rigid surround around the vibrating contactor (presence of contrast). Where there is no rigid surround, an increase in static force reduces the threshold in the high-frequency region and increases it at low frequencies. When the static forces are sufficiently large, the thresholds reach a minimum value above 30 Hz and a maximum one below 30 Hz, this being the crossover frequency. Under these conditions in the frequency region around 200 Hz, where the threshold is determined by the Pacini receptor system, the vibration sensitivities of finger pad and thenar eminence (glabrous skin) are equal, while the value for the inner side of the forearm (hairy skin) is 12 dB higher. However, when a rigid surround is used, the threshold increases above 30 Hz and decreases below 30 Hz. The latter increase in sensitivity, which is introduced by the presence of contrast cues, amounts to about 20 dB and is sharply tuned at 18 Hz for the glabrous skin of the finger. It is argued that in this case the threshold is determined by the Meissner receptor system. This increase in sensitivity is less pronounced (about 10 dB) and less sharply tuned for the other sites. Finally, when the contact of the vibrating surface to the skin is at a minimum, the vibration threshold has the same displacement value (about 3 microns) over the whole frequency region independent of the site of stimulation and whether or not a rigid surround is present.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411025     DOI: 10.1121/1.396365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Power requirements for vibrotactile piezo-electric and electromechanical transducers.

Authors:  C A Perez; A J Santibañez; C A Holzmann; P A Estévez; C M Held
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The influence of spatial contrast on the frequency-dependent nature of vibration sensitivity.

Authors:  H Muijser
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

3.  Acute effects of vibration from a chipping hammer and a grinder on the hand-arm system.

Authors:  S Kihlberg; M Attebrant; G Gemne; A Kjellberg
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The shape of the vibrotactile loudness function: the effect of stimulus repetition and skin-contactor coupling.

Authors:  A A Collins; R W Cholewiak
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-04

5.  Application of vibrotactile feedback of body motion to improve rehabilitation in individuals with imbalance.

Authors:  Conrad Wall
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Vibrotactile perception threshold measurements for diagnosis of sensory neuropathy. Description of a reference population.

Authors:  R Lundström; T Strömberg; G Lundborg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Two-point vibrotactile discrimination related to parameters of pulse burst stimulus.

Authors:  C A Perez; C A Holzmann; H E Jaeschke
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Both ipsilateral and contralateral localized vibratory stimulations modulated pain-related sensory thresholds on the foot in mice and humans.

Authors:  Atsushi Doi; Juntaro Sakasaki; Chikato Tokunaga; Fumiya Sugita; Syota Kasae; Keisuke Nishimura; Yushi Sato; Takako Kuratsu; Sariya Hashiguchi; Min-Chul Shin; Megumu Yoshimura
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Spatial and temporal influences on discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli on the arm.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt; Leigh A Mrotek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vibrotactile Presentation of Musical Notes to the Glabrous Skin for Adults with Normal Hearing or a Hearing Impairment: Thresholds, Dynamic Range and High-Frequency Perception.

Authors:  Carl Hopkins; Saúl Maté-Cid; Robert Fulford; Gary Seiffert; Jane Ginsborg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.