Literature DB >> 34109745

Antibiotic resistance in mucosal bacteria from high Arctic migratory salmonids.

Kristy Moniz1, Virginia K Walker1, Vishal Shah2.   

Abstract

Two related salmonids, Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) sampled from the high Arctic region of Nunavut, Canada are anadromous fish, migrating annually from the same ice-covered freshwater waterbodies to spend summers in the marine waters of the Arctic Ocean. Microbiota associated with the skin-associated mucus undergo community change coincident with migration, and irrespective of this turnover, antibiotic resistance was detected in mixed bacterial cultures initiated with mucus samples. Although as expected most bacteria were unculturable, however, 5/7 isolates showed susceptibility to a panel of five common antibiotics. The fish were sampled under severe conditions and at remote locations far from human habitation. Regardless, two isolates, 'Carnobacterium maltaromaticum sm-2' and 'Arthrobacter citreus sm', showed multi-resistance to two or more antibiotics including ampicillin and streptomycin indicating multiple resistance genes. It is unknown if these fish bacteria have 'natural' resistance phenotypes or if resistance has been acquired. As result of these observations, we urge long-term monitoring of drug-resistant bacteria in the region and caution the assumption of a lack of drug-resistant organisms even in such extreme environments.
© 2021 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology Reports published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34109745      PMCID: PMC9292178          DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep        ISSN: 1758-2229            Impact factor:   4.006


Introduction

Members of the salmonid family of teleost fish, Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis), were sampled from the high Arctic. These fish spend summers feeding in the rich waters of the Arctic Ocean but must swim up rivers to inland lakes in order to escape sub‐zero temperatures during sea ice formation in the autumn, with these two related species migrating at the same time and on the same routes (Moore et al., 2017; Hamilton et al., 2019; Element et al., 2020). Such migratory behaviour, known as anadromy, is a challenge to fish health with seasonal changes in salinity forcing osmoregulatory changes involving adaptations to the gills, alimentary tract, epithelium, and kidney function (McCormick, 2012; Kononova et al., 2019). Also critical during migration is the conservation of the fish immune system associated with the mucosal surfaces of the skin (Llewellyn et al., 2014). This acts as the first line of defence against pathogens and is fortified with defence cells and antibacterial peptides, with the mucus also hosting commensal bacteria that show seasonal salinity‐associated turnover (Lokesh and Kiron, 2016; Hamilton et al., 2019; Element et al., 2020). These bacteria found in the mucus likely provide protection against pathogenic bacteria and the risk of dysbiosis in migrating salmonids. Here, we hypothesized that the microbiota employ strategies to ensure their persistence in skin‐associated communities. Initially, we have tested our hypothesis by the characterization of skin mucous isolates for antibiotic resistance. Of the many discoveries of 20th century that have impacted the life span and quality of mankind, antibiotic discovery has been one of the major advancements in the field of medicine (Gould and Bal, 2013). The use of antibiotics has contributed to the 1.4‐fold extension of human life spans over the last 100 years in western nations (Rossolini et al., 2014; Ventola, 2015), with non‐medical applications in agricultural practise including use as a growth enhancers in livestock production (Martinez, 2009; Manyi‐Loh et al., 2018). Although the widespread use of antibiotics has resulted in increased prevalence of antibiotic‐resistant microorganisms in the environment, it is also possible that commensal bacteria could naturally harbour antibiotic‐resistant phenotypes related to their function and persistence, or that resistome acquisition could be beneficial for the probiotic continuance. In this regard, it is acknowledged that ‘natural’ antibiotic‐resistance distant from human habitation is not widespread although antibiotic resistance genes have been occasionally recovered from glaciers in five continents, and ampicillin resistance was reported in polar bear microbiota, and in freshwater samples collected well away from human activities in Antarctica (Glad et al., 2010; Segawa et al., 2013; Jara et al., 2020). In the current study, we have investigated whether antibiotic‐resistant bacteria are present in the mucosal community of anadromous salmonids caught in the lower Northwest Passage of the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut, Canada. Fishing sites were all located about 130 km from Gjoa Haven Nunavut, a hamlet of 1300 people with neither agricultural activities nor hospital facilities. Our goal was to determine whether antibiotic resistance, possibly acquired naturally from this relatively ‘clean’ environment was present in mucus‐associating microbiota.

Results and discussion

Mucosal samples were cultured as a mixed consortium under the conditions described including fish caught at three different sites in either the spring or fall fishing seasons, during migration either to the sea or to lakes, respectively. Not all the samples could be cultured (about 13/24, with 10 of the better growing cultures retained). As is well known, only a fraction of a percent of environmental isolates can be successfully cultured (e.g. Amann et al., 1995; Schleifer, 2004; Walker et al., 2006). Mucosal samples studied here are no exception and we were able to culture only a small fraction of the bacteria identified as part of the microbiota (Hamilton et al. 2019). Only three genera with a final abundance ≥1%, in the mixed cultures, including Carnobacterium, Psychrobacter and Granulicatella were identified (Supporting Information Table S1), with other bacteria at <1%. In all the mucosa samples analysed, Carnobacterium and Psychrobacter combined for over 95% of the cultured microbial community (Supporting Information Table S1). Carnobacterium is a well‐known cold‐water bacterium, Psychrobacter has been recovered from polar marine environments and ice cores, and Granulicatella has been associated with biofilms and marine organisms (Collins et al., 2010; Iskandar et al., 2017; Gong et al., 2020). After antibiotic exposure, variation in community composition of the mixed cultures was observed (Supporting Information Table S1). Strikingly, when comparing the percentage of each of the bacteria that made up the cultured community assessed in the presence or absence of each antibiotic, all the bacteria at the genera level are resistant to at least one antibiotic tested (Table 1; Supporting Information Table S1). For example, Carnobacterium species were resistant to kanamycin and ampicillin but susceptible to tetracyline. Considerable phenotypic variation was seen when these consortia were cultured in presence of streptomycin and chloramphenicol. We interpret this to suggest that resistance to these antibiotics was not widespread, with drug‐resistant bacteria variably present in the salmonids. Psychrobacter species were susceptible to a single antibiotic, kanamycin, and resistant to tetracycline. Further, this organism was resistant in the mucosa samples of some fish and sensitive in others (variable resistance) to ampicillin, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol. In contrast, Granulicatella species were more susceptible to the addition of antibiotics compared to other tested bacteria but showed some resistance to three of the antibiotics tested. Overall, bacteria from mixed cultures showed resistance to ampicillin and streptomycin.
Table 1

Qualitative assessment of antibiotic sensitivity of the microorganisms present in the mucosa of S. alpinus when grown as a mixed community in presence of antibiotics, with quantitative data shown in the Supplementary Table S1, and with the following qualitative assessments: Resistant, % composition of the organisms is higher in presence of antibiotic when compared to control in all the mucosa samples analysed; Sensitive, % composition of the organism is lower in presence of antibiotic when compared to control in all the mucosa samples analysed; Variable, % composition of the organisms is higher in some mucosa samples and lower in other samples in presence of antibiotics when compared to control.

Antibiotic Granulicatella Psychrobacter Carnobacterium
AmpicillinResistantVariableResistant
ChloramphenicolSensitiveVariableVariable
KanamycinVariableSensitiveResistant
StreptomycinVariableVariableVariable
TetracyclineSensitiveResistantSensitive
Qualitative assessment of antibiotic sensitivity of the microorganisms present in the mucosa of S. alpinus when grown as a mixed community in presence of antibiotics, with quantitative data shown in the Supplementary Table S1, and with the following qualitative assessments: Resistant, % composition of the organisms is higher in presence of antibiotic when compared to control in all the mucosa samples analysed; Sensitive, % composition of the organism is lower in presence of antibiotic when compared to control in all the mucosa samples analysed; Variable, % composition of the organisms is higher in some mucosa samples and lower in other samples in presence of antibiotics when compared to control. Attempts to obtain pure plate cultures from the initial mixed mucosal liquid cultures resulted in seven independent isolates with a single isolate chosen from each mixed culture (Table 2). Curiously, even though Granulicatella was one of the three most abundant genera in the mixed liquid culture, subsequently no single colonies belonging to this genus could be isolated. We speculate that growth of these bacteria was dependent on other species in the consortium. Consistent with this interpretation, it has previously been reported that when plated on solid medium, Granulicatella appears as satellite colonies around other organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus or S. epidermidis that provide nutrients for growth (Koh et al., 2014). Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene fragments from each colony identified the seven isolates to their closest relatives and this has been shown along with metadata associated with their original fish hosts (Table 2). Each isolate was tested for antibiotic resistance and comparison of the MIC50 values demonstrated that in contrast to the mixed cultures, five of the seven isolates were susceptible to all the antibiotics tested (MIC50 values < 1 μg μl−1; Table 2). Notably, however, the remaining two isolates, both derived from S. alpinus mucus, showed multi‐drug resistance; ‘Carnobacterium maltaromaticum sm‐2’ (the second Carnobacterium salmonoid mucus isolate recovered) showed resistance to three of the antibiotics tested, ampicillin, kanamycin and streptomycin (MIC50 values > 1 μg μl−1), and ‘Arthrobacter citreus sm’, was resistant to ampicillin and streptomycin (Table 2). The observed multi‐resistant phenotype for both ampicillin and streptomycin in these two isolates was consistent with the liquid assay for the mixed cultures (Table 1). Never‐the‐less, neither of these Gram‐positive multidrug resistant bacteria are salmonid pathogens of concern. Previous research has shown that the organisms may be of positive benefit to the fish, with C. maltaromaticum and A. citreus showing antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively (Kerr, 1999; Ringø, 2008).
Table 2

Characterization of Arctic salmonid skin‐associated mucosal isolates, indicating the closest accession numbers for the 16S rRNA sequences with species shown if identity was ≥97% but in quotes since the identification was based on sequence identity only and with the addition of a sm (salmonid mucosa) subscript, the fish identification (ID) number and salmonid species, collection time, the distance from the hamlet, as well as antibiotic resistance including the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC50) values of pure cultures of the respective isolates in the presence of the antibiotics listed.

Isolates Arthrobacter citreus sm Carnobacterium maltaromaticum sm‐1 Carnobacterium maltaromaticum sm‐2 Psychrobacter alimentarius sm Psychrobacter cibarius sm Rhodococcus sp. sm Sphingomonas sp sm
Closest AccessionNR026188.1NR044710NR044710.2NR025798.1NR043057.1NR116275.1NR042129
Identity (%)99.498.298.199.999.599.699.1
km from hamlet130130135135120130130
Water typeBrackishBrackishBrackishBrackishFresh #2106/1BrackishBrackish
Fish ID/site#885/7#803/7#886/6#880/6Dec. 2016#457/7#824/7
Fishing dateSept. 2016Sept. 2016Sept. 2016Sept. 2016 Salvelinus Sept. 2018Sept. 2016
Salmonid type Salvelinus Salvelinus Salvelinus Salvelinus Coregonus Salvelinus
Antibiotic Resistance:YesNoYesNoNoNoNo
Ampicillin0.48
MIC50 (μg/μl)2.40.0963000.480.480.48
Kanamycin<7.7 × 10−5
MIC50 (μg/μl)0.0096<7.7 × 10−5 60.0096<7.7 × 10−5 <7.7 × 10−5
Tetracycline0.012
MIC50 (μg/μl)1.9 × 10−5 1.9 × 10−5 0.000480.0120.0120.012
Streptomycin0.0096
MIC50 (μg/μl)60.24300.24<7.7 × 10−6 0.24
Chloramphenicol0.024
MIC50 (μg/μl)0.00480.00480.60.00480.0240.0048
Characterization of Arctic salmonid skin‐associated mucosal isolates, indicating the closest accession numbers for the 16S rRNA sequences with species shown if identity was ≥97% but in quotes since the identification was based on sequence identity only and with the addition of a sm (salmonid mucosa) subscript, the fish identification (ID) number and salmonid species, collection time, the distance from the hamlet, as well as antibiotic resistance including the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC50) values of pure cultures of the respective isolates in the presence of the antibiotics listed. We acknowledge that the number of antibiotic‐resistant organisms in the mucosa of Arctic salmonids could be larger than that observed in our study. Fish were caught in remote Arctic areas and sometimes under the ice, with freezing of some fish occurring as soon as the nets were pulled above water into sub‐zero air temperatures. Thus, freezing was the only practical way to return all the samples from distant fishing to the laboratory, which also ensured that there was no spoilage. It is known, however, that bacterial communities in the mucosa are protected by the presence of fish mucus, which contains protein and mucins, the latter which are known to preserve bacteria for years at sub‐zero temperatures (Hubálek, 2003). Notwithstanding this consideration, there is the possibility of decreased bacterial viability due to freezing. In addition, assays for antibiotic resistance in microbial consortia were conducted at concentrations ranging from 5 μg μl−1 to 100 μg μl−1. We allow that by testing at lower antibiotic concentrations and transport at low, but non‐freezing temperatures, more bacteria showing low levels of resistance might have been recovered. It is none‐the‐less clear from the observed results that some bacteria found in the mucus of anadromous Arctic salmonids are resistant to antibiotics. Whether this is an ancient attribute, evolved as part of a commensal strategy to help protect host fish from pathogens by preserving beneficial bacteria is uncertain. Indeed, it has been reported that some antibiotic resistance is ‘intrinsic’ to bacteria from tilapia fish internal organs (Wamala et al., 2018). Certainly, C. maltaromaticum effectively produces bacteriocins that inhibit disease‐producing Gram‐positive pathogenic bacteria in the gut of salmonids (Ringø, 2008), but the nature of these is unknown, and the mechanism whereby the bacteriocin‐producers remain viable remains undiscovered. Alternatively, the acquisition of antibiotic resistance could be more recent, coincident with the rise of the use of these therapies in health and agriculture. Even though individual Arctic salmonids may live for several decades, seasonal ‘turnover’ would allow fresh colonization twice yearly. Given the multi‐drug‐resistant phenotype of two of the isolates, this could suggest that gene transfer of resistomes may occur even in the high Arctic. Given that the fishing sites were at least 120 km from the closest human habitation consisting of a small hamlet without a hospital or agricultural activities (Table 2), we speculate that such resistomes may be derived from some of the more than 100 different migratory bird species in this region (Latour et al., 2008). Migratory birds could likely bring bacteria and as well as antibiotic resistance genes from the south to their breeding grounds in the most remote part of the polar regions (Sjölund et al., 2008; Hernández and González‐Acuña, 2016). Once the genes are introduced in the community, the genetic plasticity of the microbial community could enable resistance genes to move quickly throughout different environmental bacterial populations and communities (Watts et al., 2017). If this is the case, climate change and the consequent increasing economic activities in the region may provide selective pressure for the increase of antibiotic resistance in the Arctic. We have already urged monitoring of anthropogenic contaminants in these fish (Walker et al., 2020), and we suggest that it would be prudent to on‐going monitoring of the prevalence of drug‐resistant bacteria in the region, and in‐particular for human and animal pathogens. Appendix S1: Supporting Information Click here for additional data file. Table S1 Genera comparison of mucosa microbial community cultured in 10% TSB‐ASW media for individual fish samples in absence (C, Control) and presence of antibiotics (A, Ampicilin; K, Kanamycin; T, Tetracycline; S, Streptomycin; Ch, Chloramphenicol). Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

1.  Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in glacier environments.

Authors:  Takahiro Segawa; Nozomu Takeuchi; Andres Rivera; Akinori Yamada; Yoshitaka Yoshimura; Gonzalo Barcaza; Kunio Shinbori; Hideaki Motoyama; Shiro Kohshima; Kazunari Ushida
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.541

2.  The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2015-04

3.  Persistence of bacterial and archaeal communities in sea ice through an Arctic winter.

Authors:  R Eric Collins; Gabrielle Rocap; Jody W Deming
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Discrepant satellitism for identification of Granulicatella adiacens isolates.

Authors:  Young Rae Koh; Jongyoun Yi; Hyung Hoi Kim; Chulhun L Chang; Shine Young Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 5.  The Rising Tide of Antimicrobial Resistance in Aquaculture: Sources, Sinks and Solutions.

Authors:  Joy E M Watts; Harold J Schreier; Lauma Lanska; Michelle S Hale
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.118

6.  Anadromous Arctic Char Microbiomes: Bioprospecting in the High Arctic.

Authors:  Erin F Hamilton; Geraint Element; Peter van Coeverden de Groot; Katja Engel; Josh D Neufeld; Vishal Shah; Virginia K Walker
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26

7.  Unraveling Heterogeneity of Coral Microbiome Assemblages in Tropical and Subtropical Corals in the South China Sea.

Authors:  Sanqiang Gong; Xuejie Jin; Lijuan Ren; Yehui Tan; Xiaomin Xia
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 8.  Teleost microbiomes: the state of the art in their characterization, manipulation and importance in aquaculture and fisheries.

Authors:  Martin S Llewellyn; Sébastien Boutin; Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar; Nicolas Derome
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Transition from freshwater to seawater reshapes the skin-associated microbiota of Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Jep Lokesh; Viswanath Kiron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Antibiotic Use in Agriculture and Its Consequential Resistance in Environmental Sources: Potential Public Health Implications.

Authors:  Christy Manyi-Loh; Sampson Mamphweli; Edson Meyer; Anthony Okoh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.