Literature DB >> 34109395

Are competing-risk models superior to standard Cox models for predicting cardiovascular risk in older adults? Analysis of a whole-of-country primary prevention cohort aged ≥65 years.

Hannah Cooper1, Sue Wells1, Suneela Mehta1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and deaths from non-CVD causes, which may preclude a CVD event, increase with age. We evaluated whether accounting for the competing risk of non-CVD death improves the performance of CVD risk-prediction equations in older adults.
METHODS: All New Zealanders aged ≥65 years in 2012 without a prior CVD hospitalization were identified by anonymized linkage of eight routinely collected national health data sets. Sex-specific equations estimating the 5-year risk of a fatal or non-fatal CVD event were constructed using standard Cox and Fine-Gray (competing-risk) approaches. The pre-specified predictors were: age, ethnicity, deprivation level, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and baseline preventive pharmacotherapy. Model performance was evaluated by assessing calibration and discrimination in the overall cohort and in ethnic and age-specific subgroups.
RESULTS: Among 360 443 people aged ≥65 years with 1 615 412 person-years of follow-up, 14.6% of men and 12.1% of women had a first CVD event, whereas 8.5% of men and 7.6% of women died from a non-CVD cause. Standard Cox models overestimated the mean predicted the 5-year CVD risk by ∼1% overall and by 5-6% in the highest risk deciles. The mean predicted CVD risk from the Fine-Gray models approximated the observed risk overall, although slight underestimation occurred in some subgroups. Discrimination was similar for both models.
CONCLUSIONS: In a whole-of-country primary prevention cohort aged ≥65 years, standard Cox models overestimated the 5-year CVD risk whereas the Fine-Gray models were generally better calibrated. New CVD risk equations that take competing risks into account should be considered for older people.
© The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Fine-Gray regression; competing risks; older age; risk prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34109395     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  3 in total

1.  Cholesterol and Hypertension Treatment Improve Coronary Risk Prediction but Not Time-Dependent Covariates or Competing Risks.

Authors:  Isaac Subirana; Anna Camps-Vilaró; Roberto Elosua; Jaume Marrugat; Helena Tizón-Marcos; Ivan Palomo; Irene R Dégano
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 5.814

2.  Predictive performance of a competing risk cardiovascular prediction tool CRISK compared to QRISK3 in older people and those with comorbidity: population cohort study.

Authors:  Shona J Livingstone; Bruce Guthrie; Peter T Donnan; Alexander Thompson; Daniel R Morales
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 11.150

3.  Validation of the 30-Year Framingham Risk Score in a German Population-Based Cohort.

Authors:  Susanne Rospleszcz; Fabian Starnecker; Birgit Linkohr; Moritz von Scheidt; Christian Gieger; Heribert Schunkert; Annette Peters
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.