| Literature DB >> 34108945 |
Asma Imran1, Sughra Hakim1, Mohsin Tariq1,2,3, Muhammad Shoib Nawaz1, Iqra Laraib1, Umaira Gulzar1,4, Muhammad Kashif Hanif1,5, Muhammad Jawad Siddique1, Mahnoor Hayat1, Ahmad Fraz1,2,3, Muhammad Ahmad1.
Abstract
During and after the green revolution in the last century, agrochemicals especially nitrogen (N) were extensively used. However, it resulted in a remarkable increase in crop yield but drastically reduced soil fertility; increased the production cost, food prices, and carbon footprints; and depleted the fossil reserves with huge penalties to the environment and ecological sustainability. The groundwater, rivers, and oceans are loaded with N excess which is an environmental catastrophe. Nitrogen emissions (e.g., ammonia, nitrogen oxide, nitrous oxide) play an important role in global climate change and contribute to particulate matter and acid rain causing respiratory problems, cancers, and damage to forests and buildings. Therefore, the nitrogen-polluted planet Earth needs concerted global efforts to avoid the disaster. Improved agricultural N management focuses on the synchronization of crop N demand and N supply along with improving the N-use efficiency of the crops. However, there is very little focus on the natural sources of N available for plants in the form of diazotrophic bacteria present inside or on the root surface and the rhizosphere. These diazotrophs are the mini-nitrogen factories that convert available (78%) atmospheric N2 to ammonia through a process known as "biological nitrogen fixation" which is then taken up by the plants for its metabolic functioning. Diazotrophs also stimulate root architecture by producing plant hormones and hence improve the plant's overall ability to uptake nutrients and water. In recent years, nanotechnology has revolutionized the whole agri-industry by introducing nano-fertilizers and coated/slow-releasing fertilizers. With this in mind, we tried to explore the following questions: To what extent can the crop N requirements be met by diazotroph inoculation? Can N input to agriculture be managed in a way leading to environmental benefits and farmers saving money? Can nanotechnology help in technological advancement of diazotroph application? The review suggests that an integrated technology based on slow-releasing nano-fertilizer combined with diazotrophs should be adopted to decrease nitrogen inputs to the agricultural system. This integrated technology would minimize N pollution and N losses to much extent.Entities:
Keywords: nitrogen fixation; nitrogen pollution; nitrogen use efficiency; rhizobia; slow-releasing fertilizers
Year: 2021 PMID: 34108945 PMCID: PMC8180554 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.637815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Fertilizer usage and population growth trends in the last 100 years and future prediction (source: Meer, 2016; A). Map showing the region-wise N-fertilizer input into the agricultural system (source: Mordor Intelligence; B).
Figure 2List of different diazotrophs and their hosts.
Estimated nitrogen fixation rates of diazotrophs.
| Microorganism | Types of N fixation | Fixed N transfer | Amount of N-fixation (kg N ha−1 Y−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | |||
| 50–465 | |||
| Associative | High | ||
| Rhizobia and | Symbiotic | Moderate | 2–170 |
| Cyanobacteria | Free living | Low | 1–80 |
| 50 |
Figure 3The overall process of Rhizobium-legume symbiosis showing the locks and keys of the symbiotic specificity of (A) nodulation genes (B) and details of nitrogen fixation genes (C) present in the rhizobia (figures drawn from the available literature from different sources).
List of few diazotrophs with multi-trait characters important for the regulation of BNF and plant growth during BNF.
| Diazotrophs | PGPR Traits | Effect on plant | Plant | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production of phytohormones | Improvement in the lateral roots and root hairs in terms of number, length, weight, and volume significant improvement in root initiation, surface area, fine roots, fresh weight, and dry mass | Potato | ||
| Cytokinin | ||||
| AHLs, N2 fixation | Increased root hair formation in seedlings | Soybean, wheat | ||
| Improved P acquisition, N2 fixation | Increase the uptake of nutrients to aerial parts of the plants | | ||
| N2 fixation | Improved Zn in the plant and grain | Wheat, cotton | ||
| N2 fixation, P solubilization, auxins, siderophores | Improved plant growth and mineral nutrition especially Fe | Maize, tomato | ||
| HCN. Antibiotics, siderophores | Control the pathogen | |||
| Reduced disease incidence of | ||||
| Suppress the growth of | ||||
| Antibiotics and antifungal compounds | ||||
| Cotton and rice | ||||
| Acc-deaminase | Increase plant root system, improve plant growth, and tolerate salinity stress | |||
| | ACC deaminase, IAA, P solubilization | Improved growth, induced plant response for defense enzymes, chlorophyll, proline, soluble sugars | Maize | |
| EPS | ||||
| IAA, P solubilization | Increase in nitrogen uptake and improved root and shoot growth | Tomato red pepper | ||
| Actinobacteria mostly | IAA, P solubilization, stress tolerance | Salinity tolerance, high | | |
| Clod-tolerant, nitrogen-fixing | Improved growth and soil N | Finger miller and pulses |
List of few diazotrophs’ inoculation under field conditions for BNF under reduced application of N fertilizer.
| Diazotrophs | N details of the experiment | Effect on plant | Plant | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculation | Produce plant regulators which enhance the activity and expression of different enzymes involved in the plant metabolism of nitrogen | Sugarcane | ||
| Inoculation | Increase in the activity of genes associated with reduction and uptake of nitrate in inoculated plants | |||
| 33% N fertilizer + inoculation | Increased a number of different maize metabolites, showing specie specific plant-bacterial interaction and functional nitrogenase activity | Maize | ||
| Inoculation | Reducing the need of nitrogen fertilizers | Maize | ||
| Inter cropping with xaraes grass | Minimum production of dry mass and increased crude protein content due to N coverage fertilization, up to the dose of 120 kg ha−1 N | Maize | ||
| 50% of N fertilizer + inoculation | Growth of plant especially tiller count was the same in low condition and inoculation as in the standard condition of nitrogen | Rice | ||
| Zero N + inoculation | Same growth as with 100% N fertilizer | Rice | ||
| Inoculation only | Grain yield was increased 29% in comparison to those plants where 100 kg N per hectare fertilizer was added | Rice | ||
| 50% N + inoculation | Growth performance, nitrogen uptake, and biomass yield were similar to full fertilizer | Sugarcane | ||
| Diazotrophic bacteria | Zero N + inoculation | Comparable yield increase to that with 120 kg ha−1 N fertilization | Sugarcane RB72454 | |
| PGPB | Applied in combination with reduced N fertilizer | Significant increase in the relative chlorophyll index, tiller units, yield, total nitrogen uptake, and nutrient concentration of total nitrogen by combining nitrogen fertilizers with PGPB | | |
| Enhances the uptake of nitrogen, calcium, manganese, iron, and ammonia | ||||
| Without any fertilizer + inoculation | Similar growth and grain yield as full N fertilizer | Soybean |