Literature DB >> 34108743

Nested g-computation: A causal approach to analysis of censored medical costs in the presence of time-varying treatment.

Jason A Roy1, Nandita Mitra2,3, Andrew J Spieker4, Emily M Ko3,5.   

Abstract

Rising medical costs are an emerging challenge in policy decisions and resource allocation planning. When cumulative medical cost is the outcome, right-censoring induces informative missingness due to heterogeneity in cost accumulation rates across subjects. Inverse-weighting approaches have been developed to address the challenge of informative cost trajectories in mean cost estimation, though these approaches generally ignore post-baseline treatment changes. In post-hysterectomy endometrial cancer patients, data from a linked database of Medicare records and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute reveal substantial within-subject variation in treatment over time. In such a setting, the utility of existing intent-to-treat approaches is generally limited. Estimates of population mean cost under a hypothetical time-varying treatment regime can better assist with resource allocation when planning for a treatment policy change; such estimates must inherently take time-dependent treatment and confounding into account. In this paper, we develop a nested g-computation approach to cost analysis to address this challenge, while accounting for censoring. We develop a procedure to evaluate sensitivity to departures from baseline treatment ignorability. We further conduct a variety of simulations and apply our nested g-computation procedure to two-year costs from endometrial cancer patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 34108743      PMCID: PMC8186489          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  20 in total

1.  Linear regression analysis of censored medical costs.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Bo Lu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt; Enrique F Schisterman; Haitao Chu; Daniel Westreich; David Richardson; Charles Poole
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Implementation of G-computation on a simulated data set: demonstration of a causal inference technique.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Sherri Rose; Kathleen M Mortimer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Estimating medical costs from incomplete follow-up data.

Authors:  D Y Lin; E J Feuer; R Etzioni; Y Wax
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Methods for dealing with time-dependent confounding.

Authors:  R M Daniel; S N Cousens; B L De Stavola; M G Kenward; J A C Sterne
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Costs for heart failure with normal vs reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Lawrence Liao; James G Jollis; Kevin J Anstrom; David J Whellan; Dalane W Kitzman; Gerard P Aurigemma; Daniel B Mark; Kevin A Schulman; John S Gottdiener
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-09

8.  The parametric g-formula to estimate the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich; Stephen R Cole; Jessica G Young; Frank Palella; Phyllis C Tien; Lawrence Kingsley; Stephen J Gange; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Analysis of occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer mortality using the g formula.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; David B Richardson; Haitao Chu; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Irene Papanicolas; Liana R Woskie; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analyzing medical costs with time-dependent treatment: The nested g-formula.

Authors:  Andrew Spieker; Jason Roy; Nandita Mitra
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Net benefit separation and the determination curve: A probabilistic framework for cost-effectiveness estimation.

Authors:  Andrew J Spieker; Nicholas Illenberger; Jason A Roy; Nandita Mitra
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.021

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.