| Literature DB >> 34108716 |
A Sarah Walker1,2,3,4, Koen B Pouwels5,6,7, Emma Pritchard1,2, Philippa C Matthews1,3,8, Nicole Stoesser1,2,3,8, David W Eyre2,3,8,9, Owen Gethings10, Karina-Doris Vihta1,2, Joel Jones10, Thomas House11,12, Harper VanSteenHouse13,14, Iain Bell10, John I Bell15, John N Newton16, Jeremy Farrar17, Ian Diamond10, Emma Rourke10, Ruth Studley10, Derrick Crook1,2,3,8, Tim E A Peto1,2,3,8.
Abstract
The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in the general community is still unclear. Here, we used the Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey-a large community-based survey of individuals living in randomly selected private households across the United Kingdom-to assess the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca; ChAdOx1) vaccines against any new SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive tests, split according to self-reported symptoms, cycle threshold value (<30 versus ≥30; as a surrogate for viral load) and gene positivity pattern (compatible with B.1.1.7 or not). Using 1,945,071 real-time PCR results from nose and throat swabs taken from 383,812 participants between 1 December 2020 and 8 May 2021, we found that vaccination with the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines already reduced SARS-CoV-2 infections ≥21 d after the first dose (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 54-68%) versus 66% (95% CI = 60-71%), respectively), with greater reductions observed after a second dose (79% (95% CI = 65-88%) versus 80% (95% CI = 73-85%), respectively). The largest reductions were observed for symptomatic infections and/or infections with a higher viral burden. Overall, COVID-19 vaccination reduced the number of new SARS-CoV-2 infections, with the largest benefit received after two vaccinations and against symptomatic and high viral burden infections, and with no evidence of a difference between the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34108716 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01410-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440