| Literature DB >> 34108565 |
Islam Nour1, Atif Hanif1, Ibrahim O Alanazi2, Ibrahim Al-Ashkar3,4, Abdulkarim Alhetheel5, Saleh Eifan6.
Abstract
The routine evaluation of water environments is necessary to manage enteric virus-mediated fecal contamination and the possible emergence of novel variants. Here, we detected human rotavirus A (HRVA) circulating in two wastewater treatment plants, two lakes, irrigation water and a wastewater landfill located in Riyadh. VP7-derived surface protein sequences were assessed by phylogenetic analyses and inspection of thermotolerance-mediated secondary structure and seasonal variation. HRVA was most prevalent at An-Nazim wastewater landfill (AN-WWLF; 63.89%). Phylogenetic analyzes revealed the predominance of HRVA G2 lineage for the first time in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, a single HRVA sequence (2B64I-ANLF3/2018) was recovered at 45 °C from AN-WWLF; secondary structure prediction indicated that this sequence was thermotolerant with a high hydrophobicity, an absence of Ramachandran outliers, and a higher content of proline patches on the protein surface. Varied relationships were significantly observed between sampling areas influenced by temperature ranges (p < 0.05). HRVA prevalence was influenced by seasonal variations, favoring moderate temperatures in late autumn and early winter in all locations. However, a significant temperature impact was detected in Wadi-Hanifah Lake (p = 0.01). Our study extends the knowledge of currently circulating HRVA genotypes, and indicates the probable emergence of thermotolerant strains and seasonally mediated HRVA prevalence.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34108565 PMCID: PMC8190275 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91607-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
HRVA prevalence in different sample locations.
| Sampling area | HRVA + ve 2018 | HRVA + ve 2019 | HRVA prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| KSU-WWTP | 3 | 2 | 13.89 |
| MAN-WWTP | 2 | 0 | 5.56 |
| WHL | 7 | 3 | 27.78 |
| WNL | 8 | 3 | 30.56 |
| AN-WWLF | 16 | 7 | 63.89 |
| IRTW | 1 | 1 | 5.56 |
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree for the HRVA VP7-derived sequences constructed by the maximum likelihood method and Tamura three-parameter model. The highest log likelihood tree is displayed (− 898.28). The percentage of associated taxa that are clustered together are provided at each branch. Heuristic search-dependent initial trees were produced automatically via Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms applied to the pairwise distances matrix and assessed by the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, followed by the highest log likelihood-resulted topology selection. The rate variation model was permitted to be evolutionarily invariable for several sites ([+ I], 44.78% sites), according to the best fitting substitution model validation (Table S2). The horizontal distance connecting two HRVA sequences is proportional to the genetic distance between these two HRVA sequences. The distance is expressed as the number of the nucleotide substitutions per site. Strain CNMC122 (G12P[8]) was used as an outgroup. Accession numbers of sequences used for phylogenetic analysis are displayed in Table S3.
HRVA sequences grouping (Grouping is based on zero-distance between studied sequences as well as extraneously with other strains used for phylogenetic analysis implemented by pairwise distancing using Kimura three-parameter method).
| Studied sequence | Similar sequence(s) | Country of origin* |
|---|---|---|
| 2B64I-KSU1/2018 | RT125-07/2008/G2P4 | Canada |
| 2B64I-MANF1/2018 | 2B64I-MANF2/2018 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2B64I-WHL1/2018 | 2B64I-WHL2/2018 | |
| 2B64I-WHL3/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WHL4/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WHL1/2019 | 2B64I-WHL2/2018 | |
| 2B64I-WHL3/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WHL4/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-ANLF1/2019 | 2B64I-WHL1/2019 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2B64I-WHL5/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL1/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL2/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL3/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL4/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL5/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL6/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-WNL1/2019 | ||
| 2B64I-ANLF2/2019 | ||
| 2B64I-ANLF4/2019 | ||
| 2B64I-ANLF1/2018 | 2B64I-ANLF2/2018 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2B64I-ANLF4/2018 | ||
| 2B64I-KSU2/2018 | BLU5-vp7/2018/G2P4 | Japan |
| G12021182/2012/G2P4 | China | |
| 07-96s-498/2007/G2P4 | Taiwan | |
| G17081040/2017/G2P4 | China | |
| B4285/2017/G2P8 | Thailand | |
| SH-RV76/2015/G2P4 | China | |
| Seoul1433/2010/G2P4 | South Korea | |
| O1270/2011/G2P8 | Russia | |
| Nov11-N1936/2011/G2P8 | Russia | |
| O1157/2011/G2P4 | Russia | |
| BE34/2006/G2P4 | Belgium | |
| B110056/2011/G2P4 | Japan | |
| CK20027/2006/G2P4 | Australia | |
| BL-5210/2006/G2P4 | Indonesia | |
| PAK-HF56/2010/G2P4 | Pakistan | |
| 2B64I-ANLF3/2019 | Saudi Arabia | |
| 2B64I-IRTW1/2018 | 2B64I-KSU1/2019 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2B64I-IRTW1/2019 |
*Country of origin of similar sequences.
Figure 2Amino acid sequence alignment of 2B64I-ANLF3/2018 (designated RVAANLF3) and 2B64I-ANLF5/2018 (designated RVAANLF5).
Figure 3Ramachandran plot showing hydrophobic residues for (a) 2B64I-ANLF3/2018 and (b) 2B64I-ANLF5/2018. Ramachandran plot was obtained by using SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/). The red circle refers to hydrophobic residues in the β-sheet. The blue circle denotes the hydrophobic residues in right-handed helix. Residues outside the circles represent residual outliers.
Pearson’s correlation matrix of HRVA detection percentage at the various sampling areas.
| % DetKSU-WWTP | % DetMAN-WWTP | % DetWHL | % DetWNL | % DetAN-WWLF | %DetIRTW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % DetKSU-WWTP | 0.773 | 0.796 | 0.627 | 0.637 | ||
| % DetMAN-WWTP | 0.686 | 0.347 | 0.423 | 0.196 | 0.632 | |
| % DetWHL | 0.631 | 0.614 | ||||
| % DetWNL | 0.466 | 0.267 | ||||
| % DetAN-WWLF | 0.751 | 0.537 | 0.786 | 0.402 | ||
| % DetIRTW | 0.759 | 0.632 | 0.799 |
The numbers above the grey-highlighted diagonal refers to correlation values at high-temperature range, whereas correlation values at low-temperature range are below the diagonal. % Det denotes HRVA detectability percentage at different sampling areas, for instance % DetKSU-WWTP refers to HRVA detection percentage at KSU-WWTP.
*Significant correlation values are displayed as bold numbers.
Figure 4Temperature variation influence on the HRVA prevalence in water samples. “Av. Temp. High” refers to the average high temperature and “Av. Temp. Low” refers to the average low temperature.
The significance of impact of high or low-temperature ranges on HRVA prevalence in various sampling areas.
| Sampling area | Temperature range | R2 | RMSE | Equation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KSU-WWTP | High | 0.353 | 21.022 | % PrevKSU-WWTP = 74.24–1.86* TH‡ |
| Low | 0.61 | 10.511 | % PrevKSU-WWTP = 46.52–1.57* TL | |
| MAN-WWTP | High | 0.043 | 28.242 | % PrevMAN-WWTP = 38.81–0.71* TH |
| Low | 0.043 | 28.242 | % PrevMAN-WWTP = 30.24–0.71* TL | |
| WHL | High | 8.223 | % PrevWHL = 87.52–2.29* TH | |
| Low | 0.442 | 18.797 | % PrevWHL = 54.67–2* TL | |
| WNL | High | 0.601 | 13.715 | % PrevWNL = 79.07–2.01* TH |
| Low | 0.553 | 13.189 | % PrevWNL = 49.98–1.75* TL | |
| AN-WWLF | High | 0.502 | 9.051 | % PrevAN-WWLF = 50.36–1.09* TH |
| Low | 0.281 | 12.88 | % PrevAN-WWLF = 34.96–0.96* TL | |
| IRTW | High | 0.154 | 41.975 | % PrevIRTW = 83.096–2.14* TH |
| Low | 0.154 | 41.975 | % PrevIRTW = 57.38–2.14* TL |
% Prev refers to HAdV prevalence percentage at different sampling areas. RMSE denotes the root mean squared error which is an absolute measure of fit.
*Significant at p < 0.05.
‡TH represents the highest temperature detected whereas TL denoted lowest temperature detected.