| Literature DB >> 34108237 |
Tiphaine Le Roy1, Emilie Moens de Hase1, Matthias Van Hul1, Adrien Paquot2, Rudy Pelicaen1, Marion Régnier1, Clara Depommier1, Céline Druart1, Amandine Everard1, Dominique Maiter3,4, Nathalie M Delzenne5, Laure B Bindels5, Marie de Barsy3,4, Audrey Loumaye3,4, Michel P Hermans3,4, Jean-Paul Thissen3,4, Sara Vieira-Silva6,7, Gwen Falony6,7, Jeroen Raes6,7, Giulio G Muccioli2, Patrice D Cani8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the abundance and the prevalence of Dysosmobacter welbionis J115T, a novel butyrate-producing bacterium isolated from the human gut both in the general population and in subjects with metabolic syndrome. To study the impact of this bacterium on host metabolism using diet-induced obese and diabetic mice.Entities:
Keywords: intestinal microbiology; obesity; probiotics
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34108237 PMCID: PMC8862106 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Figure 1Dysosmobacter spp correlates negatively with BMI in humans. (A) Pearson’s correlation matrix between Dysosmobacter spp abundance in the faecal microbiota and clinical variables in the Microbes4U cohort. *P<0.05. (B) Dysosmobacter spp relative abundance in the faecal microbiota of a cohort of overweight and obese humans. (C) Dysosmobacter spp concentration in stool samples from a cohort of overweight and obese humans. (D) Pearson’s correlation between Dysosmobacter spp relative abundance and BMI. (E) Pearson’s correlation between Dysosmobacter spp absolute concentration and BMI. (F) Pearson’s correlation between Dysosmobacter spp concentration and fasting blood glucose. (G) Pearson’s correlation between Dysosmobacter spp. and glycated haemoglobin. Results are represented as dot-plots with median for figure parts B, C. BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin.
Figure 2Live Dysosmobacter welbionis J115T prevents diet-induced obesity in mice without major alterations of the faecal microbiota composition. (a) Body weight gain of mice fed a HFD and treated during 6 weeks by daily oral gavage with 1.0×109 colony forming units (cfus) of freshly prepared D. welbionis J115T (HFD J115-fresh) and mice fed a control diet or a high-fat diet (HFD) and treated by daily oral gavage with vehicle. (B, C) Body weight and fat mass gain of mice treated during 10 weeks by daily oral gavage with live D. welbionis J115T frozen in trehalose (1.0×109 cultivable, live bacteria per day and per mouse) and fed a HFD (HFD Live J115) or pasteurised D. welbionis J115T (HFD pasteurised J115) (1.0×109 heat-killed bacteria per day and per mouse) and mice fed a HFD and treated by daily oral gavage with vehicle. (D, E) Body weight and fat mass of mice treated during 13 weeks by daily oral gavage live D. welbionis J115T frozen in trehalose (1.0×109 cultivable, live bacteria per day and per mouse) and fed a HFD (HFD Live J115) and mice fed a control diet or a HFD and treated by daily oral gavage with vehicle. (F) Mesenteric, subcutaneous (inguinal) and epididymal fat pads weight at the end of the 13-week period. (G) Principal coordinates analysis of the microbiota composition of experiment 2. Mice microbiota were clustered and the centre of gravity computed for each group. (H) Relative abundance of the bacterial genera significantly altered by HFD or live D. welbionis J115T treatments. (I) Cladogram representing mice microbiota with white clade markers highlighting bacterial groups significantly more abundant in control mice than in HFD mice, black clade markers markers highlighting bacterial groups significantly more abundant in HFD mice than in control mice and light blue clade markers highlighting bacterial groups significantly increased (circle) or decreased (square) by live D. welbionis J115T administration in HFD-fed mice as assessed by figure part H. (J) Dysosmobacter spp concentration estimated by quantitative PCR in the caecal content of the mice. Number of mice per group: 10–12. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for figure parts A, F and J and two-way repeated measures ANOVA for figure parts B–E. Data were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s pairwise multiple comparison procedure for H–I. *q<0.05; **q<0.01; ***q<0.001. Results are represented as dot plots and bar plots with mean±SEM for figure parts A, F and J, and as boxes and whiskers (first quartile, median and third quartile) for figure part H. In figure parts B–E *q < 0.05; **q<0.01; ***q<0.001 for HFD versus HFD Live J115 comparisons and ¤¤¤q<0.001 for control versus HFD comparisons. In figure part C, #p=0.06. HFD, high-fat diet.
Figure 3Live Dysosmobacter welbionis J115T moderately alters gut physiology. (A) Representative H&E-stained pictures of the jejunum. Scale bar=100 µm. (B) Relative expression of genes related to gut barrier function in the jejunum. (C) Mean crypts and villi’s height in the jejunum. (D) Transit time. (E), Percentage of calories absorbed from the food. Number of mice per group: 10–12. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for figure part B. *q<0.05; ***q<0.001. Results are represented as bar plots with mean±SEM for figure parts B–D and dot plots and bar plots with mean±SEM for figure parts C–E. HFD, high-fat diet.
Figure 4Live Dysosmobacter welbionis J115T reduces adipose tissue expansion and inflammation on high-fat diet (HFD) and improves altered metabolic profile. (A) Plasma glucose profile and (B) mean area under the curve measured during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). (C) Plasma insulin measured 30 min before and 15 min after glucose administration during the OGTT. (D) Insulin resistance index. (E) Leptin, (F) resistin, (G) glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and (H) plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) plasma levels after a 6 hours fasting period. (I) Representative H&E-stained pictures of subcutaneous and mesenteric adipose tissues (SAT and MAT, respectively). Scale bar=100 µm. (J) Adipocytes diameter (µm) distribution in the SAT. (K) Adipocytes diameter (µm) distribution in the MAT. (L) Relative expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in the SAT. (M) Relative expression of genes related to inflammation and immune system in the SAT. Number of mice per group: 9–12. Results are represented as dot plots and bar plots with mean±SEM for figure parts B–H and as bar plots with mean±SEM for figure parts L and M. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for figure parts B–H, L and M and two-way repeated measures ANOVA for figure parts A, J and K. *q<0.05; **q<0.01; ***q<0.001 for HFD versus HFD Live J115 comparisons and ¤¤q<0.01 control versus HFD, ¤¤¤q<0.001 for control versus HFD comparisons. HFD, high-fat diet.
Figure 5Live Dysosmobacter welbionis J115T reduces high fat diet (HFD)-induced brown adipose tissue (BAT) dysfunction and increases mitochondria number. (A) Interscapular BAT weight of mice treated by daily oral gavage with live D. welbionis J115T frozen in trehalose and fed an HFD (HFD Live J115) or mice fed a control diet or a HFD and treated by daily oral gavage with an equivalent volume of vehicle. (B) Representative H&E-stained pictures of BAT. Scale bar=100 µm. (C) Percentage of white area on the slices, corresponding to lipid droplets, in the BAT. (D) Scatter dot plot between RNA-seq expression data of a pool of RNA from the BAT of HFD mice and a pool of RNA from the BAT of HFD J115 mice. (E) Relative expression of genes related to inflammation and immune system in the BAT. (F) Relative expression of genes related to extracellular matrix and fibrosis in the BAT. (G) Relative expression of genes related to mitochondria number and function in the BAT. (H) citrate synthase activity per mg of BAT. (I) Citrate synthase activity per brown fat pad. (J) Body temperature of mice treated by daily oral gavage with live D. welbionis J115T and fed a high fat-diet (HFD Live J115) or mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) and gavaged daily with vehicle for 3 weeks (experiment 4, see methods). Number of mice per group: 10–12 in figure parts A, C and E–I). Number of mice per group: 7 in figure part J. Results are represented as dot plots and bar plots with mean±SEM for figure part A, C and H–J and as bar plots with mean±SEM for figure parts E–G. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for figure parts A, C and E–I and Mann-Whitney test for figure part J. *q<0.05; **p or q<0.01; ***q<0.001.HFD, high-fat diet.