Quan Liu1, Isabella M Gaeta2, Mengyang Zhao3, Ruining Deng1, Aadarsh Jha1, Bryan A Millis2, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen4, Matthew J Tyska2, Yuankai Huo5. 1. Vanderbilt University, Computer Science, Nashville, TN, 37215, USA. 2. Vanderbilt University, Cell and Developmental Biology, Nashville, TN, 37215, USA. 3. Tufts University, Computer Science, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. 4. Vanderbilt University, Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN, 37215, USA. 5. Vanderbilt University, Computer Science, Nashville, TN, 37215, USA. Electronic address: yuankai.huo@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quantitative analysis of microscope videos often requires instance segmentation and tracking of cellular and subcellular objects. The traditional method consists of two stages: (1) performing instance object segmentation of each frame, and (2) associating objects frame-by-frame. Recently, pixel-embedding-based deep learning approaches these two steps simultaneously as a single stage holistic solution. Pixel-embedding-based learning forces similar feature representation of pixels from the same object, while maximizing the difference of feature representations from different objects. However, such deep learning methods require consistent annotations not only spatially (for segmentation), but also temporally (for tracking). In computer vision, annotated training data with consistent segmentation and tracking is resource intensive, the severity of which is multiplied in microscopy imaging due to (1) dense objects (e.g., overlapping or touching), and (2) high dynamics (e.g., irregular motion and mitosis). Adversarial simulations have provided successful solutions to alleviate the lack of such annotations in dynamics scenes in computer vision, such as using simulated environments (e.g., computer games) to train real-world self-driving systems. METHODS: In this paper, we propose an annotation-free synthetic instance segmentation and tracking (ASIST) method with adversarial simulation and single-stage pixel-embedding based learning. CONTRIBUTION: The contribution of this paper is three-fold: (1) the proposed method aggregates adversarial simulations and single-stage pixel-embedding based deep learning (2) the method is assessed with both the cellular (i.e., HeLa cells); and subcellular (i.e., microvilli) objects; and (3) to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore annotation-free instance segmentation and tracking study for microscope videos. RESULTS: The ASIST method achieved an important step forward, when compared with fully supervised approaches: ASIST shows 7%-11% higher segmentation, detection and tracking performance on microvilli relative to fully supervised methods, and comparable performance on Hela cell videos.
BACKGROUND: The quantitative analysis of microscope videos often requires instance segmentation and tracking of cellular and subcellular objects. The traditional method consists of two stages: (1) performing instance object segmentation of each frame, and (2) associating objects frame-by-frame. Recently, pixel-embedding-based deep learning approaches these two steps simultaneously as a single stage holistic solution. Pixel-embedding-based learning forces similar feature representation of pixels from the same object, while maximizing the difference of feature representations from different objects. However, such deep learning methods require consistent annotations not only spatially (for segmentation), but also temporally (for tracking). In computer vision, annotated training data with consistent segmentation and tracking is resource intensive, the severity of which is multiplied in microscopy imaging due to (1) dense objects (e.g., overlapping or touching), and (2) high dynamics (e.g., irregular motion and mitosis). Adversarial simulations have provided successful solutions to alleviate the lack of such annotations in dynamics scenes in computer vision, such as using simulated environments (e.g., computer games) to train real-world self-driving systems. METHODS: In this paper, we propose an annotation-free synthetic instance segmentation and tracking (ASIST) method with adversarial simulation and single-stage pixel-embedding based learning. CONTRIBUTION: The contribution of this paper is three-fold: (1) the proposed method aggregates adversarial simulations and single-stage pixel-embedding based deep learning (2) the method is assessed with both the cellular (i.e., HeLa cells); and subcellular (i.e., microvilli) objects; and (3) to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore annotation-free instance segmentation and tracking study for microscope videos. RESULTS: The ASIST method achieved an important step forward, when compared with fully supervised approaches: ASIST shows 7%-11% higher segmentation, detection and tracking performance on microvilli relative to fully supervised methods, and comparable performance on Hela cell videos.
Authors: Michal Drozdzal; Gabriel Chartrand; Eugene Vorontsov; Mahsa Shakeri; Lisa Di Jorio; An Tang; Adriana Romero; Yoshua Bengio; Chris Pal; Samuel Kadoury Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: C De Hauwer; I Camby; F Darro; I Migeotte; C Decaestecker; C Verbeek; A Danguy; J L Pasteels; J Brotchi; I Salmon; P Van Ham; R Kiss Journal: J Neurobiol Date: 1998-11-15
Authors: Pavel Matula; Martin Maška; Dmitry V Sorokin; Petr Matula; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solórzano; Michal Kozubek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David A Van Valen; Takamasa Kudo; Keara M Lane; Derek N Macklin; Nicolas T Quach; Mialy M DeFelice; Inbal Maayan; Yu Tanouchi; Euan A Ashley; Markus W Covert Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Vladimír Ulman; Martin Maška; Klas E G Magnusson; Olaf Ronneberger; Carsten Haubold; Nathalie Harder; Pavel Matula; Petr Matula; David Svoboda; Miroslav Radojevic; Ihor Smal; Karl Rohr; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Boudewijn Lelieveldt; Pengdong Xiao; Yuexiang Li; Siu-Yeung Cho; Alexandre C Dufour; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Constantino C Reyes-Aldasoro; Jose A Solis-Lemus; Robert Bensch; Thomas Brox; Johannes Stegmaier; Ralf Mikut; Steffen Wolf; Fred A Hamprecht; Tiago Esteves; Pedro Quelhas; Ömer Demirel; Lars Malmström; Florian Jug; Pavel Tomancak; Erik Meijering; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia; Michal Kozubek; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Leslie M Meenderink; Isabella M Gaeta; Meagan M Postema; Caroline S Cencer; Colbie R Chinowsky; Evan S Krystofiak; Bryan A Millis; Matthew J Tyska Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Martin Maška; Vladimír Ulman; David Svoboda; Pavel Matula; Petr Matula; Cristina Ederra; Ainhoa Urbiola; Tomás España; Subramanian Venkatesan; Deepak M W Balak; Pavel Karas; Tereza Bolcková; Markéta Streitová; Craig Carthel; Stefano Coraluppi; Nathalie Harder; Karl Rohr; Klas E G Magnusson; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Pavel Křížek; Guy M Hagen; David Pastor-Escuredo; Daniel Jimenez-Carretero; Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia; Erik Meijering; Michal Kozubek; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 6.937