Literature DB >> 34107311

Vitreoretinal Complications in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1.

Diana Khair1, Ali Salimi2, Mona Harissi-Dagher3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of vitreoretinal complications, treatment modalities, and the visual outcomes in a large cohort of eyes that underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.
DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series.
METHODS: 132 eyes of 114 patients who underwent KPro implantation at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from 2008 to 2017 were included with at least 1 year follow-up. Charts were reviewed and data was collected, including demographics, initial corneal indication for surgery, posterior segment complications, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 68.2 months and 61.4% of eyes developed postoperative vitreoretinal complications (VRC). The most common VRC was RPM formation (38.6%, n=51) followed by RD (15.2%, n=20), CME (12.1%, n=16), ERM (9.8%, n=13), endophthalmitis (9.1%, n=12), sterile vitritis (7.6%, n=10), vitreous hemorrhage (6.8%, n=9), choroidal detachment (3.0%, n=4) and central retinal vein occlusion (0.7%, n=1). BCVA improved in the no VRC group from 1.74 ± 0.33 logMAR to 1.33±0.83 logMAR and in the VRC group from 1.74±0.36 logMAR to 1.52±0.83 logMAR, without any statistically significant intergroup differences (p=0.231). RD was the only significant complication associated with poorer visual outcomes (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Potentially blinding secondary complications occur in the majority of patients and frequent monitoring is necessary, specifically in the early and intermediate postoperative periods. This study evidenced significant improvements in visual outcomes of KPro eyes, including those that developed postoperative vitreoretinal complications.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis; KPro; Retinal detachment; artificial cornea; complications; corneal blindness; vitreoretinal complications

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34107311     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  3 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Steven Bonneau; C Maya Tong; Yelin Yang; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Ultra-wide field imaging to assess the optic nerve and retina in Boston type I and II keratoprosthesis patients.

Authors:  William R Bloom; Matthew D Karl; Sarah B Smith; Yusra F Shao; William Terrell; Ahmad B Tarabishy; Andrew J Hendershot; Rebecca A Kuennen; Tyler D Oostra; Thomas F Mauger; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-07

3.  iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass with or Without Cataract Surgery Yields Sustained 5-Year Glaucoma Control.

Authors:  Fritz H Hengerer; Gerd U Auffarth; Ina Conrad-Hengerer
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.845

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.