Literature DB >> 34106079

Needs and Experiences of Users of Digital Navigation Tools for Mental Health Treatment and Supportive Services: Survey Study.

Elizabeth Stafford1, Teri Brister1, Ken Duckworth1, Natali Rauseo-Ricupero2, Sarah Lagan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a recent proliferation in web-based and digital resources that are designed to assist users in finding appropriate mental health treatment and supportive services, it can be overwhelming, confusing, and difficult for an individual or family member to access and use an appropriate navigation tool. As digital resources are increasingly sought after, there is an urgent need for a clearer understanding of digital navigation tools in order to help link individuals with the tool that is best suited to their needs.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the needs of individuals seeking mental health treatment and supportive services and to quantify their experiences and satisfaction with available digital navigation tools.
METHODS: A survey was offered via an email newsletter and social media posting throughout the extended membership of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, which includes both individuals with a mental health condition and their family members and support networks. A 13-item anonymous survey, which consisted of multiple-choice and open response options, was developed to measure participants' past use of and experiences with web-based, mobile, and phone-based navigation tools. The survey was available from April 9 through May 21, 2020.
RESULTS: A total of 478 respondents completed the survey; the majority of respondents were female (397/478, 83.1%) and aged ≥35 years (411/478, 86%). Younger respondents were more likely to report seeking mental health services for themselves, while older respondents were more likely to be searching for such services on behalf of a family member. The majority of respondents seeking such services on behalf of a family member (113/194, 58.2%) required a combination of mental health treatment and supportive services. Furthermore, two-thirds of respondents (322/478, 67.4%) used a navigation tool to find treatment or services. The majority of respondents who provided feedback about their experiences with navigation tools (224/280, 80%) reported difficulties, with data availability and accuracy being the most commonly reported issues.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest that issues with data availability and accuracy in available navigation tools remain a major barrier for locating timely and appropriate mental health treatment and supportive services within the population of individuals seeking such services. Particularly for individuals seeking care on behalf of a family member, improving the accuracy of and users' experiences with navigation tools could have a major impact on effectively connecting people to treatment and support services. ©Elizabeth Stafford, Teri Brister, Ken Duckworth, Natali Rauseo-Ricupero, Sarah Lagan. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 09.06.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital tools; directories; mental health; navigation; needs; perception; quality; satisfaction; supportive services

Year:  2021        PMID: 34106079     DOI: 10.2196/27022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Ment Health        ISSN: 2368-7959


  3 in total

1.  Canadian perspectives of digital mental health supports: Findings from a national survey conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nelson Shen; Iman Kassam; Sheng Chen; Clement Ma; Wei Wang; Navi Boparai; Damian Jankowicz; Gillian Strudwick
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-22

2.  Self-Efficacy, Internet Self-Efficacy, and Proxy Efficacy as Predictors of the Use of Digital Social and Health Care Services Among Mental Health Service Users in Finland: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Birgitta Tetri; Soile Juujärvi
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  Dementia Caregiver Experiences and Recommendations for Using the Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention System at Home: Usability and Acceptability Study.

Authors:  Martha Smith Anderson; Azziza Bankole; Nutta Homdee; Brook A Mitchell; Grace E Byfield; John Lach
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2021-12-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.