Literature DB >> 34106028

Mortality Rates After Paclitaxel-Coated Device Use in Patients With Occlusive Femoropopliteal Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Krystal Dinh1,2, Alexandra M Limmer2,3, Andy Z L Chen2, Shannon D Thomas4,5,6, Andrew Holden7, Peter A Schneider8, Ramon L Varcoe4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A late increased mortality risk has been reported in a summary level meta-analysis of patients with femoropopliteal artery occlusive disease treated with paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons and stents. However, at the longer follow up timepoints that analysis was limited by small trial numbers and few participants. The aim of this study was to report an updated summary level risk of all-cause mortality after treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices in that same patient group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the mortality outcomes associated with paclitaxel-coated devices used to treat patients with occlusive disease of femoropopliteal arteries (last search date December 10, 2020). The single primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 34 randomized controlled trials (7654 patients; 84% intermittent claudication). There were 622 deaths among 4147 (15.0%) subjects in the paclitaxel device group and 475 deaths among 3507 (13.5%) subjects in the noncoated control group [relative risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.20, p=0.20, I2=0%). All-cause mortality was similar between groups at 12 months (34 studies, 7654 patients; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.22, p=0.94, I2=0%), 24 months (20 studies, 3799 patients; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.55, p=0.31, I2=0%), and 60 months (9 studies, 2288 patients; RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.45, p=0.08, I2=0%).
CONCLUSION: This updated meta-analysis with included additional trials and larger patient numbers shows no evidence of increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices, compared with uncoated devices for femoropopliteal disease at all time points to 60 months. There is therefore no justification to limit their use, or alter regulatory body follow-up recommendations in this patient population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42020216140.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balloon angioplasty; drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting balloon(s); drug-eluting stent(s); drug-releasing balloon; paclitaxel; paclitaxel-coated balloon; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; peripheral arterial disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 34106028     DOI: 10.1177/15266028211023505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  3 in total

Review 1.  Update on the pathophysiology and medical treatment of peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Jonathan Golledge
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Drug-eluting versus nondrug peripheral vascular interventions.

Authors:  Tariq Enezate; Anandbir Singh Bath; Viswanatha Chinta; Jad Omran
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenyang Zhang; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.