Hayam M Sayed1, Mahmoud M Said2, Nadia Y S Morcos2, Mona A El Gawish1, Amel F M Ismail3. 1. Radiation Biology Department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt. 2. Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. 3. Drug Radiation Research Department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the anticancer and radio-sensitizing efficacy of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs). ZnO-CA NPs were formulated by the conjugation of Zinc Oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) with caffeic acid (CA) that were characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectra (FT-IR), X-ray Diffractometer (XRD), and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). In vitro anticancer potential of ZnO-CA NPs was evaluated by assessing cell viability in the human breast (MCF-7) and hepatocellular (HepG2) carcinoma cell lines. In vivo anticancer and radio-sensitizing effects of ZnO-CA NPs in solid Ehrlich carcinoma-bearing mice (EC mice) were also assessed. Treatment of EC mice with ZnO-CA NPs resulted in a considerable decline in tumor size and weight, down-regulation of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) gene expressions, decreased vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) level, downregulation of phosphorylated-extracellular-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (p-ERK1/2) protein expression, DNA fragmentation and a recognizable peak at sub-G0/G1 indicating dead cells' population in cancer tissues. Combined treatment of ZnO-CA NPs with γ-irradiation improved these effects. In conclusion: ZnO-CA NPs exhibit in-vitro as well as in-vivo antitumor activity, which is augmented by exposure of mice to γ-irradiation. Further explorations are warranted previous to clinical application of ZnO-CA NPs.
This study aimed to evaluate the anticancer and radio-sensitizing efficacy of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs). ZnO-CA NPs were formulated by the conjugation of Zinc Oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) with caffeic acid (CA) that were characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectra (FT-IR), X-ray Diffractometer (XRD), and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). In vitro anticancer potential of ZnO-CA NPs was evaluated by assessing cell viability in the human breast (MCF-7) and hepatocellular (HepG2) carcinoma cell lines. In vivo anticancer and radio-sensitizing effects of ZnO-CA NPs in solid Ehrlich carcinoma-bearing mice (ECmice) were also assessed. Treatment of ECmice with ZnO-CA NPs resulted in a considerable decline in tumor size and weight, down-regulation of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) gene expressions, decreased vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) level, downregulation of phosphorylated-extracellular-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (p-ERK1/2) protein expression, DNA fragmentation and a recognizable peak at sub-G0/G1 indicating dead cells' population in cancer tissues. Combined treatment of ZnO-CA NPs with γ-irradiation improved these effects. In conclusion: ZnO-CA NPs exhibit in-vitro as well as in-vivo antitumor activity, which is augmented by exposure of mice to γ-irradiation. Further explorations are warranted previous to clinical application of ZnO-CA NPs.
Cancerous tumors are the foremost reasons for morbidity and mortality, considering
that millions of peoples are dying annually. Breast cancer (BC) is categorized at
the top of the most prevalent tumor types,
while hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most widespread malignant
tumor worldwide.
Quite a lot of basic modalities are used to manage cancerous tumors, either
alone or combined, including chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT). However, the
effectiveness and application of CT and RT are hindered by their serious side effects.
Chemotherapeutic drugs show inadequate clinical effectiveness, due to the
development of drug resistance during CT alongside the serious and life-threatening
side-effects, which increases the mortality rate in cancerpatients.
To deal with these problems, progress in new strategies is indispensable.
Scientists continuously attempt to discover novel medications from natural phytoconstituents,
or synthetic/semisynthetic organic or inorganic compounds.[6
-8] A short time ago,
nanotechnology took on the challenge of cancer treatment via fabrication of drugs in
the nano-scale of 1-100 nm.
Radioresistance of tumor cells, as well as deterioration of normal cells are
the shortcomings of RT. Accordingly, the radiosensitizers emerged as an important
hot spot in the radiation oncology field.
Radiosensitizers are agents that can drive tumor cells to be sensitive to
radiation via enhancing the liberation of free radicals, thus forcing the cells
toward apoptosis.[11,12]Metal-incorporated nanoparticles demonstrate chemical benefits, evincing synergistic
cell-damaging consequences in radiation therapy.
According to Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Zinc Oxide nanoparticles
(ZnO NPs) have emerged as a promising potent development in the medical field,
particularly in cancer applications, due to their minor toxicity to healthy human
cells.[13,14] ZnO NPs exhibit in vivo protective activities in rats and
mice,[15,16] suggesting their safety for mammalian tissues. At the same
time, ZnO NPs demonstrate in vitro anticancer activities,
inciting cytotoxicity in a cell-specific and proliferation-dependent approach.
ZnO NPs have specific characteristic features, including generation of the
reactive oxygen species (ROS), which triggers mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. The
hydroxyl radicals (OH−), perhydroxyl radicals
(HO2∙), and superoxide anions
(O2∙−), which are released from the surface of
ZnO characterize the main constituents of ZnO NPs-cytotoxicity.
To potentiate biological activities, ZnO NPs were modified via green
synthesis using a natural products extract,[20,21] doped with metal ions,
fabricated with natural products,[23,24] or loaded with antitumor
agents such as doxorubicin
and paclitaxel.
Moreover, ZnO NPs were conjugated with caffeic acid.[27-29] Caffeic acid (CA,
3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-2-propenoic acid or 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid,
C9H8O4; molecular weight (M.wt) 180.16) is a
near molecular analog of dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA).
CA is a natural phytochemical phenolic constituent in plants found in high
concentrations in coffee, wine, and tea as well as in propolis. CA exhibits
antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties, due to its rich chemical
structure of phenolic-hydroxyls;[30,31] accordingly, it exhibits
various biological functions, comprising antibacterial, anti-inflammatory,
immunomodulatory, and anticancer activities.[32,33]Accordingly, ZnO NPs were conjugated with CA to prepare ZnO-CA NPs to improve their
in vitro antitumor activity. Moreover, the in vivo radiosensitizing and antitumor
activities of ZnO-CA NPs were evaluated in an animal tumor model.
Material and Methods
Chemicals
Caffeic acid [C9H8O4, M.wt: 180.16) and Zinc
acetate [Zn(CH3CO2)2,
ZnC4H6O4 with a M.wt: 183.48] were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo, USA).
Preparation of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles
Zinc Oxide NPs were fabricated as described previously with minor modification.
Briefly, Zinc acetate was stirred in de-ionized water (2% wt/volume) at
25 ± 5°C, for 30 to 60 minutes. Then, 1 mL of absolute acetic acid was added
with continuous stirring for another 30 minutes. Then, a volume of 15 mL sodium
hydroxide (NaOH, 5 M) was added to adjust the pH to 10-11. The produced white
precipitate was rinsed with de-ionized H2O to obtain neutral pH
(7.0), then filtered to collect the ZnO NPs, which were left to dry.
Preparation of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles
Caffeic acid was conjugated with the prepared ZnO NPs at a molar ratio of 1:1 in
absolute ethanol (EtOH) solution to prepare ZnO–CA NPs. Briefly, 0.180 g CA
(1 mmol) was stirred in 100 mL absolute ethanol for 5 minutes and mixed with
0.081 g ZnO NPs that were added slowly with continuous stirring (1–2 hours, at
25 ± 5°C) in the dark. The grayish-yellow solid product was collected and rinsed
with cold absolute EtOH to remove the residual reactants. The resultant ZnO-CA
NPs were dried under vacuum overnight.
Characterizations of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles
X-ray diffraction (XRD)
The diffraction patterns of the prepared ZnO NPs and ZnO-CA NPs were
recorded with Philip’s PW1390 X’Pert Pro X-ray Diffractometer (The
PANalytical Organization, Almelo, Netherlands) with Ni-filtered Cu Kα
radiation at a 40 kV generator voltage and 0.154 nm wavelength, at
25 ± 5°C. The diffraction angle 2θ checked at a rate of 2° minutesˉ¹.
The diffractometer was operated automatically under constant operating conditions.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
The morphology of ZnO NPs, and ZnO-CA NPs was characterized by a JEM-100
CX Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at
the National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT, Cairo,
Egypt).
Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR)
Caffeic acid, ZnO NPs, and ZnO-CA NPs FT-IR spectra were recorded in the
range of 400 to 4000 cm−1, at 25 ± 5°C. The analysis was
carried out using AIT Matson Infinity Series Equipment Model 960 M0009,
4 cm−1 resolution (Triad Scientific, New Jersey,
USA).
Determination of the median lethal dose (LD50) of Zinc
Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles
The median lethal dose (LD50) of ZnO-CA NPs was assessed by the
intraperitoneal injection of increasing concentrations from the prepared
compound in female mice, according to Akhila et al.
The compound was given to 6 animals per dose. The number of deaths
and signs of clinical toxicity were recorded. The animals were observed for
all physiologic signs before dosing and for all signs of toxicity 48 hours
after dosing. One-tenth of the LD50 value has been used as an
ideal dose to determine the in-vivo antitumor activity of the investigated
compounds.
Human equivalent dose (HED) of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles
According to the method of Nair and Jacoub,
drug doses were converted from animal studies to human studies by the
body surface area (BSA) normalization method.Where NOAL is No observed adverse effect level, Km = Weight in Kg/Body
surface area
Evaluation of the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles against Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 and Human Hepatocellular
Adenocarcinoma HepG2 Cell Lines
The cytotoxicity of CA, ZnO NPs, and ZnO-CA NPs against humanbreast cancer MCF-7
and humanhepatocellular adenocarcinomaHepG2 cell lines after 48 hours was
determined using the MTT cell viability assay. As designated previously,
cells were plated in a flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plate, treated with
different concentrations of the tested compounds and incubated for 48 hours in a
humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO2. After the incubation
period, 10 µl of MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated
for 4 hours. A volume of 100 µl from the solubilizing solution was added into
each well. The plate was allowed to stand overnight and then was checked for
complete solubilization of the formazan crystal. The absorbance was measured
spectrophotometrically at 590 nm. Three independent experiments were
conducted.
Experimental Animals
Seventy-two outbred female Swiss albino mice (25-35 g) were obtained from the
Egyptian Organization for Biological Products and Vaccines (Cairo, Egypt). They
were distributed in 6 groups (n = 12), in specially-designed plastic cages,
under healthy circumstances at 25 + 5°C, with 12 hours dark/light phases
accompanied by suitable pressure, humidity, and good ventilation. Animals were
fed the available animal pellet diet (20%-23% protein) with continuous drinking
water ad-libitum. All animal procedures were carried out
following the International Standards for the experimental animals, and approved
by the NCRRT Ethical Committee (20A/21).
Radiation Exposure
The animals were subjected to gamma-irradiation from Canadian Gamma Cell-40 with
137Cesium source (Atomic Energy of a Canada Ltd., Ontario,
Canada) at the NCRRT, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, at a dose rate of
0.45 Gy/min. The animal’s whole body was exposed to 2 Gy/week for 3 successive
doses, a total of 6 Gy/anima according to Abdallah et al.
Tumor Transplantation
Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) murine cells, which were kindly given by the
National Cancer Institute (NCI, Cairo University, Egypt), were transmitted by
weekly intraperitoneal (IP) injection of Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) cells into the
mice at the NCRRT. Then, 2.5 × 106 viable EC cells were inoculated
intramuscularly into the right thigh of the lower limb of each female mouse to
create solid EC tumors.
The tumor length and width were measured at the end of the third and
fourth weeks following Ehrlich’s ascites cells inoculation, using a vernier
caliper; subsequently, tumor volume could be computed by the equation: Tumor volume(cm
) = ½(length × width
),
where the largest longitudinal diameter is the length and the largest
transverse diameter is the width.
Experimental Design
The 72 adult female mice were arbitrarily distributed equally into 6 groups of
12, as follows:Group 1 (Control, C): Mice without any treatment left for 4
consecutive weeks.Group 2 (ZnO-CA): Mice injected intraperitoneally (IP) with
ZnO-CA NPs (5 mg/100 g bw, 1/10 LD50) every other day for 3
consecutive weeks.Group 3 (Ehrlich, E): Mice-bearing EC tumor left for 4
consecutive weeks.Group 4 (E+R): One week following solid EC tumor
inoculation, animals were subjected to 2 Gy of whole-body γ-irradiation
/week for 3 consecutive weeks to 6 Gy total.Group 5 (E+ZnO-CA): One week following solid EC tumor
inoculation, mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with ZnO-CA NPs
(5 mg/100 g bw) every other day for 3 consecutive weeks.Group 6 (E+ZnO-CA+R): One week following solid EC tumor
inoculation, mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with ZnO-CA NPs
(5 mg/100 g bw) every other day along with 2 Gy whole-body γ-irradiation
/week for 3 consecutive weeks.After an overnight fasting period, all the mice were anesthetized with diethyl
ether at the end of 3 successive weeks of tumor treatment; the blood was
collected by heart puncture and separated into 2 parts. The first part was
collected in EDTA tubes, to quantify the hematologic indices. The second part
was collected in glass tubes and left to coagulate for 15 minutes at 37°C, then
the serum was separated after centrifugation at 1200 ×g, and
stored at −20°C for biochemical analysis.At autopsy, the solid tumors of different groups and the right thigh of the lower
limb of the control animals were dissected immediately, washed in sterile
isotonic saline, dried on a filter paper, and conserved at −80°C. Likewise,
parts of specimens were fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological
consideration.
Biochemical Analysis
Different hematological parameters (hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, red blood
cells (RBCs), white blood cells (WBCs), and platelet (PLTs) counts) were
assessed in the whole blood samples using a blood counter (BC-2800, Mindray,
China). The serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase
(AST) activities, as well as creatinine concentrations were analyzed using
commercial kits provided by Spinreact (Spain), whereas serum urea level was
assayed using a commercial kit supplied by Diamond Diagnostics (Egypt).
RNA Extraction and Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
(qRT-PCR)
Parts of the solid tumor (groups 3-6) and the right thigh of the lower limb
(groups 1 and 2) from animals were used for the determination of B-cell lymphoma
2 (BCL2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) gene expression. RNeasy®
Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used to obtain the total RNA from the tissue
samples as specified by the manufacturer’s instructions, reverse transcribed
into complementary DNA (cDNA) by Thermo Scientific™ RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA
Synthesis Kit (Fermentus, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, UK), and then amplified
using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), in a thermal
cycler (ABI PRISM 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System, USA), using Power
SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA). The
following thermal cycling conditions were used: 95°C for 10 minutes,
subsequently, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, finally 60°C for 1 minute. The
sequence of PCR primer pairs and gene bank accession numbers were as follows;
B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL2) (NM_009741.5): F: 5′-GTG GTG GAG GAA CTC TTC AG- 3′, R:
5′ GTT CCA CAA AGG CAT CCC AG-3′,
Nuclear Factor-Kappa B (NF-κB) (NM_008689.2): F: 5′-GAA ATT CCT GAT CCA
GAC AAA AAC-3′, R: 5′-ATC ACT TCA ATG GCC TCT GTG TAG-3′ and glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), (NM_008084), F: 5′-ATG TGT CCG TCG TGG ATC
TGA C-3′, R: 5′-AGA CAA CCT GGT CCT CAG TGT AG-3′.
The obtained data were examined, handling the ABI Prism sequence
detection system software, then computed by PE Biosystems (Foster City, CA) v1•7
Sequence Detection Software. Using the proportional threshold cycle technique,
the genes’ relative expression ratios were assessed and standardized to the
GAPDH gene. The expression 2−ΔΔCt was applied to quantify the final
relative ratios.
Western Blot Analysis of Phosphorylated-Extracellular-Regulated Kinase 1 and
2
A tissue sample (100 mg) was homogenized in 1.0 mL ice-cold RIPA lysing buffer
and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The protein
concentration was calculated in the separated supernatant using the Bradford
Protein Assay Kit (BIO BASIC INC., Markham Ontario, Canada). Twenty micrograms
of protein in each lane were screened with 10% SDSpolyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, then transported to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The
membrane was then incubated at room temperature for 2 hours with 5% bovine serum
albumin in TBST blocking solution, then incubated with a phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202,
Tyro204) primary antibody solution (1/500) (Cat No: 14-9109-82, Invitrogen,
USA) at 4°C overnight and thereafter rinsed 3 times with
TBST buffer. Subsequently, the membrane was incubated with a secondary
monoclonal antibody connected with horseradish peroxidase, at room temperature
for 2 hours. A Clarity TM Western ECL chemiluminescent substrate (BIO-RAD, USA)
was successively added to the membrane. The chemiluminescent signals were
captured by a CCD camera. Image analysis software was used after standardization
with β-actin on the Chemi DocTM MP imager to measure the band
strength of the phosphorylated-extracellular-regulated kinase (p-ERK1/2) protein
expression against the control sample.
Determination of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Level
A mouse sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (MyBioSource, Cat
No. MBS2601120, USA) was used to calculate the concentration of vascular cell
adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in the thigh muscles or tumor tissues.
DNA Fragmentation Assay
DNA fragmentation analysis was performed, using agarose gel electrophoresis.
Briefly, a small piece of the thigh muscle of the normal control mice or
tumor tissues of different treated groups were incubated in Triton-Tris-EDTA
(TTE) lysis buffer and proteinase-K overnight at 50°C; sodium chloride (4 M) was
then added, and the tubes were shaken vigorously for 20 seconds, and centrifuged
at 20000 ×g for 10 minutes, at 27°C. The supernatant was mixed with cold
absolute ethanol (1:1 v/v). The samples were centrifuged and the DNA pellet was
washed with 70% ethanol then re-suspended in TE buffer. Equal volumes of DNA
were mixed with the loading buffer and 10 μL was applied into each well of a 1%
agarose gel. An appropriate DNA molecular weight marker of 100 to 1000 base
pairs (M) (BIO BASIC INC, Markham, Ontario, Canada) was included. The
electrophoresis was run in Tris Acetate EDTA (TAE) buffer containing bromophenol
blue dye. To visualize DNA, the gel was placed on a UV transilluminator and
photos of the gel were taken.
Analysis of Cell Cycle Progression by Flow Cytometry
Analysis of the cell cycle by flow cytometry was carried out according to the
method of Givan.
Briefly, 0.1 g frozen right thigh muscle or solid EC tumor was
homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and washed twice with PBS. After
centrifugation, the cell pellets were re-suspended and incubated at room
temperature for 30 minutes in 1 mL of propidium iodide (PI)/Triton X-100
staining solution (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, 0.2 mg/mL RNase A and 10 mg/mL PI).
A MoFlo Flow Cytometer (MoFlo, DakoCytomation, Denmark) was used to examine the
stained cells.
Histopathological Observation
Right thigh muscles and solid EC tumor tissue specimens were fixed in 10%
formalin solution for at least 3 days at 4°C, then processed to form paraffin
cubes. Thin sections (4-5 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)
solution and examined under a light microscope.
Statistical Analysis
The Shapiro-Wilks normality test (p > 0.05) revealed that all
data had been normally distributed. Using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA),
statistical analysis of the difference between means was carried out. In the
case of a significant F-ratio, the multi-comparison post hoc Duncan test was
used to evaluate the statistical significance among the treated groups at a
significance level of p<0.05. All the statistical analysis
was performed using version 20.0 of the Statistical Package for Social Science
(SPSS).
Results
Characterizations of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles
The X-ray diffraction peaks showed the nanocrystalline character and purity of
ZnO NPs with hexagonal wurtzite structure. These peaks were at scattering angles
(2θ) of 31.77, 34.40, 36.22, 47.50, 56.60, 62.63, 66.39, 67.95, 69.06, 72.56 and
76.97, which can designate diffraction from: 100, 002, 101, 102, 110, 103, 200,
112, 201, 004, and 202 crystal planes, respectively (Figure 1a). Similarly, the X-ray
diffraction pattern of ZnO-CA NPs indicates that the product had a typical
hexagonal wurtzite structure and no diffraction peaks of CA or other impurity
phases were detected (Figure
1b).
Figure 1.
Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles, and Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles.
Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles, and Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles.Abbreviations: XRD: X-ray diffraction; TEM: transmission electron
microscopy; FT-IR: Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.A TEM scan of ZnO NPs showed a fully aggregated shape with a spherical structure
and average particle size of approximately 30 nm (Figure 1c). Dis-similarly, ZnO-CA NPs
exhibit the desegregation of ZnO NPs and absorption of CA on their surface.
Spherical ZnO-CA NPs with approximately 23 nm size were noticed (Figure 1d).FT-IR spectra of CA were identical, and contained absorption bands characteristic
of phenol-carboxylic acids: 3431 and 3350 cm−1ν(OH)arom,
3231 cm−1 ν( = C-H)arom, 3057, 3026, and
2988 cm−1ν(CH) + ν(CH)C = C, 2837–2565 cm−1ν(OH)acid,
1645 cm−1ν(C = O), 1526 and 1451 cm−1ν(CC),
1354 cm−1ν(CC) + β(OH), 1279 cm−1ν(C-OH),
1218 cm−1β(OH) + β (CH)C = C, 1175 cm−1β(CH),
1119 cm−1β(CH), 972 γ(CH)C = C + γ(CH), 935 cm−1
γ(CH), 901 cm−1 ν(CCO), 851 cm−1 γ(CH),
816 cm−1 β(C = O), 780 cm−1 γ(CH), 736 cm−1
α(CCC), 698 cm−1γ(C = O), 648 cm−1 β(C = O),
600 cm−1 γ(OH). The symbol “ν,” “β,” “γ,” and “α (CCC)”: indicate
the stretching vibrations, in-plane bending modes, out-of-plane bending modes,
and the aromatic ring in-plane bending modes, respectively (Figure 1e). The structural analysis of
wurtzite ZnO nanoparticles was further verified through FT-IR exploration:
3393 cm−1 ν(O-H), 2876 cm−1 ν(CO2), 1558
and 1507 and 1338 cm−1 ν(C = O), 829, 675, 52, and
471 cm−1 ν(Zn-O) (Figure 1f). The ZnO-CA NPs FT-IR spectra
with the following signals: 3393, 3314 cm−1 ν(O-H), 3057, 3026, and
2988 cm−1ν(CH) + ν(CH)C = C, 2880 cm−1
ν(CO2), 1556 and 1510 cm−1 ν(C = O),
1269 cm−1ν(C-OH), 1218 cm−1β(OH) + β (CH)C = C,
1121 cm−1β(CH), 972 γ(CH)C = C + γ(CH), 832 cm−1, 675,
521, and 471 cm−1 ν(Zn-O) were noticed (Figure 1g).
Determination of the Median Lethal Dose (LD50) of Zinc
Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles
The results revealed that the LD50 value of ZnO-CA NPs is
50.0 mg/100 g bw (Table
1).
Table 1.
Determination of the Median Lethal Dose (LD50) of Zinc
Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles in Female Mice.
Dose of ZnO-CA NPs (mg/100 g bw)
No. of mice
Survivors (S)
Deaths (D)
Mortality (%)
10
6
6
0
0
20
6
6
0
0
30
6
6
0
0
40
6
5
1
16.7
50
6
3
3
50.0
60
6
2
4
66.7
Abbreviation: bw, body weight.
Determination of the Median Lethal Dose (LD50) of Zinc
Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles in Female Mice.Abbreviation: bw, body weight.
Human Equivalent Dose (HED) of Zinc Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles
From the results in Table
1: NOAL = 3 mg/Kg bw.Km = Weight in Kg/Body surface area.The average mouse weight in this study is 30 gm and the body surface area is
0.01 m2.Therefore, the Km factor for mice is calculated by dividing 0.03 by 0.01.On the other hand, the average human body weight is 60 kg and the body surface
area is 1.62 m2. Therefore, the Km factor for humans is
calculated by dividing 60 by 1.62.Thus: Animal Km = 0.03/0.01, Human Km 60/1.62.Accordingly, the Human Equivalent Dose of ZnO-CA NPs: HED = 0.243 mg/Kg.
In Vivo Toxicity and Mortality Study
During the experimental period (4 weeks), no mortality was recorded in normal
control mice or those treated with ZnO-CA NPs as well as in EC solid
tumor-bearing mice, either per se or those treated with ZnO-CA NPs. One female
mouse out of 12 died (8.3% mortality) in animals bearing solid EC tumor that
were either irradiated only or co-administered ZnO-CA NPs along with
γ-irradiation.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Caffeic Acid, Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles, and Zinc
Oxide-Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles against MCF7 and HepG2 Cells
The viability percentages (viability%) of the breast cancer (MCF7) and humanhepatocellular adenocarcinomaHepG2 cell lines treated with different
concentrations of CA, ZnO NPs, and ZnO-CA NPs were declined, however, their
toxicity percentages (toxicity%) were enhanced in a dose-dependent manner, as
demonstrated in Figure
2. The median growth inhibitory concentration (IC50)
values of CA, ZnO NPs, and ZnO-CA NPs were 38.23, 7.92, and 9.22 µg/mL for MCF7
cells, while, IC50 values of 50.02, 21.52, and 11.53 µg/mL were
evaluated for HepG2 cells, respectively. Zinc Oxide NPs triggered higher
toxicity% on MCF7 and HepG2cancer cells, as compared to that obtained by CA.
However, ZnO-CA NPs improved the toxicity% on HepG2cancer cells, as compared to
that obtained by ZnO NPs.
Figure 2.
The Viability and Toxicity percentages of Breast cancer cell line (MCF7)
and Human hepatocellular adenocarcinoma HepG2 cell lines treated with
different concentrations of Caffeic Acid, Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles, and
Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid Nanoparticles.
The median growth inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of
CA, ZnO NPs and ZnO-CA NPs were 38.23, 7.92, and 9.22 µg/mL for MCF7
cells, while, IC50 values for HepG2 cells were 50.02, 21.52,
and 11.53 µg/mL, respectively.
The Viability and Toxicity percentages of Breast cancer cell line (MCF7)
and Humanhepatocellular adenocarcinomaHepG2 cell lines treated with
different concentrations of Caffeic Acid, Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles, and
Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid Nanoparticles.The median growth inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of
CA, ZnO NPs and ZnO-CA NPs were 38.23, 7.92, and 9.22 µg/mL for MCF7
cells, while, IC50 values for HepG2 cells were 50.02, 21.52,
and 11.53 µg/mL, respectively.Abbreviations: ZnO NPs: Zinc Oxide nanoparticles; ZnO-CA NPs: Zinc
Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles.
Tumor Volume and Weight
A considerable reduction (p < 0.001) in the tumor volume of
solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs either alone (65.65% and 53.93%)
or combined with γ-irradiation (79.83% and 77.49%) was recorded at the third and
fourth weeks, respectively, after inoculation of EC cells into the right thigh
muscle of female mice, compared to untreated solid EC-bearing mice. Furthermore,
a measurable reduction (p < 0.001) in the tumor weight was
recorded in EC-bearing mice at sacrifice, either treated with ZnO-CA NPs alone
(56.1%) or combined with γ-irradiation (71.9%), as compared to untreated solid
EC-bearing mice (Table
2).
Table 2.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the Tumor Volume and Weight of Solid Ehrlich
Bearing Mice.
Groups
Tumor volume (cm³)
Tumor weight (g)
Third week (21 days)
Fourth week (28 days)
E#
Mean ± SE
1.19 ± 0.14a
1.91 ± 0.14a
5.7 ± 0.32a
E+R@
Mean ± SE
1.13 ± 0.10a
1.6 ± 0.14a
5.3 ± 0.33a
% Change
−5.04
−16.23
−7.0
E+ZnO-CA#
Mean ± SE
0.41 ± 0.06b
0.88 ± 0.14b
2.5 ± 0.16b
% Change
−65.55
−53.93
−56.1
E+ZnO-CA+R
Mean ± SE
0.24 ± 0.04b
0.43 ± 0.07c
1.6 ± 0.12c
% Change
−79.83
−77.49
−71.9
F-ratio
25.13
28.62
66.24
Results are mean of 11-12 mice ± SE; @n = 11,
and #n = 12 (one mouse out of 12 died in animals bearing
solid Ehrlich (EC) tumor that were either irradiated only or
co-administered ZnO-CA NPs along with gamma (γ)-irradiation). Values
with dissimilar superscripts are significantly different. E: Solid
EC bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole body
γ-irradiation/week, for 3 consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: mice
injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/100 g body weight ZnO-CA NPs,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. %Change versus E.
P-value < 0.001.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the Tumor Volume and Weight of Solid Ehrlich
Bearing Mice.Results are mean of 11-12 mice ± SE; @n = 11,
and #n = 12 (one mouse out of 12 died in animals bearing
solid Ehrlich (EC) tumor that were either irradiated only or
co-administered ZnO-CA NPs along with gamma (γ)-irradiation). Values
with dissimilar superscripts are significantly different. E: Solid
EC bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole body
γ-irradiation/week, for 3 consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: mice
injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/100 g body weight ZnO-CA NPs,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. %Change versus E.
P-value < 0.001.
Biochemical Parameters and Hematology Indices
The data presented in Table
3 demonstrate that mice bearing solid EC tumors showed marked
increments (p < 0.001) in serum AST and ALT activities
(264.57% and 255.06%, respectively), compared to control mice. Treatment of
solid EC-bearing mice with γ-irradiation resulted in significant declines in AST
and ALT activities (15.28% and 24.74%, respectively), compared to untreated
solid EC-bearing mice. Similarly, a considerable decline was observed in serum
AST activity of solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs alone (10.17%) or
combined with γ-irradiation (61.70%), as compared to untreated solid EC-bearing
mice. Animals bearing solid EC tumors and treated with ZnO-CA NPs manifested a
rebound to control serum ALT level, whereas a significant reduction in serum ALT
was recorded (79.13%) in solid EC-bearing mice treated with both ZnO-CA NPs and
γ-radiation, as compared to untreated solid EC-bearing mice. Also, exposure of
solid EC-bearing mice to γ-irradiation resulted in a considerable rise
(p < 0.001) in serum urea level (17.96%), compared to
untreated solid EC-bearing mice. Similarly, treatment of solid EC-bearing mice
with ZnO-CA NPs, alone or combined with γ-radiation, caused a considerable rise
in serum urea level (40.38% and 29.42%, respectively), as compared to untreated
solid EC-bearing mice. However, the serum creatinine level revealed a negligible
change in the different treatment modalities. Normal mice treated with ZnO-CA
NPs showed a slight significant decrease (p < 0.001) in Hb
concentration (11.7%), while, a significant increase
(p < 0.001) was observed in PLTs count (12.97%), as compared
to control mice. Contrarily, mice bearing solid EC tumors demonstrated a
considerable decline in Hb concentration and RBCs (22.45% and 16.0%,
respectively), however, WBCs and PLTs counts were significantly increased
(p < 0.001) (108.45% and 29.44%, respectively), as
compared to control mice. Exposure of solid EC-bearing mice to γ-irradiation
produced a significant decrease in RBCs, WBCs and PLTs counts (12.7%, 83.78%,
and 20.69%, respectively), as compared to untreated EC-bearing mice. Also,
ZnO-CA NPs treatment of solid EC-bearing mice normalized PLTs count and evinced
a considerable decline in WBCs count (27.63%), as compared to untreated
EC-bearing mice. In addition, solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs and
γ-irradiation showed considerable declines of Hb concentration, RBCs, WBCs, and
PLTs counts (21.93%, 26.98%, 79.80%, and 37.40%, respectively), as compared to
untreated EC-bearing mice (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on Some Toxicity Parameters.
Parameters
C#
ZnO-CA#
E#
E+R@
E+ZnO-CA#
E+ZnO-CA+R@
AST (U/L)
429 ± 19.9a
438 ± 22.29a
1564 ± 47.89b
1325 ± 88.30c
1405 ± 6.97c
599 ± 11.71d
% Change
2.10
264.57
208.86
227.51
39.63
% Change*
−15.28
−10.17
−61.70
ALT (U/L)
247 ± 8.99a
209 ± 11.26ad
877 ± 32.89b
660 ± 6.51c
243 ± 6.57a
183 ± 5.14d
% Change
−15.38
255.06
167.21
−1.62
25.91
% Change*
−24.74
−72.29
−79.13
Urea (mg/dL)
27.90 ± 1.33ab
25.50 ± 0.91a
26.00 ± 0.78a
30.67 ± 1.26bd
36.50 ± 1.63c
33.65 ± 0.89cd
% Change
−8.60
−6.81
9.93
30.82
20.61
% Change*
17.96
40.38
29.42
Creatinine (mg/dL)
0.52 ± 0.02a
0.51 ± 0.02a
0.5 ± 0.03a
0.48 ± 0.024a
0.47 ± 0.021a
0.51 ± 0.026a
% Change
−1.92
−3.85
−7.69
−9.62
−1.92
% Change*
−4.00
−6.00
2.00
Hb% (g/dL)
14.7 ± 0.38a
12.98 ± 0.36b
11.4 ± 0.37c
10.4 ± 0.49c
10.9 ± 0.34c
8.9 ± 0.5d
% Change
−11.7
−22.45
−29.3
−25.85
−39.46
% Change*
−8.77
−4.39
−21.93
RBCs (×1012/L)
7.5 ± 0.24a
6.9 ± 0.24ab
6.3 ± 0.2bc
5.5 ± 0.25d
5.6 ± 0.26cd
4.6 ± 0.29e
% Change
−8
−16.0
−26.67
−25.33
−38.67
% Change*
−12.7
−11.11
−26.98
WBCs (×109/L)
6.39 ± 0.40a
5.68 ± 0.39a
13.32 ± 0.29b
2.16 ± 0.14c
9.64 ± 0.10d
2.69 ± 0.12c
% Change
−10.93
108.45
−66.25
50.86
−57.90
% Change*
−83.78
−27.63
−79.80
PLTs (×109/L)
370.2 ± 3.48a
418.5 ± 13.06b
479.21 ± 12. 93c
380.08 ± 9. 5a
359.3 ± 9.55a
300.0 ± 15.48d
%Change
12.97
29.44
2.67
−2.94
−18.96
%Change*
−20.69
−25.02
−37.40
Results are mean of 11-12 mice ± SE. @n = 11, and
#n = 12 (one mouse out of 12 died in animals bearing
solid Ehrlich (EC) tumor that were either irradiated only or
co-administered ZnO-CA NPs along with gamma (γ)-irradiation). Values
with dissimilar superscripts are significantly different. C:
control, E: Solid EC bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole
body γ-irradiation/week, for 3 consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: mice
injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/100 g body weight ZnO-CA NPs,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. %Change versus C and *
%Change versus E. P-value < 0.001.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on Some Toxicity Parameters.Results are mean of 11-12 mice ± SE. @n = 11, and
#n = 12 (one mouse out of 12 died in animals bearing
solid Ehrlich (EC) tumor that were either irradiated only or
co-administered ZnO-CA NPs along with gamma (γ)-irradiation). Values
with dissimilar superscripts are significantly different. C:
control, E: Solid EC bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole
body γ-irradiation/week, for 3 consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: mice
injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/100 g body weight ZnO-CA NPs,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. %Change versus C and *
%Change versus E. P-value < 0.001.
Relative Gene Expression Ratios of B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (Bcl2) and Nuclear
Factor Kappa B (NF-κB)
The inoculation of solid EC tumors in female mice caused a considerable
up-regulation (p < 0.001) in the gene expression of tumorBCL2 and NF-κB (8.3 and 9.7 folds, respectively), compared to that of
non-EC-bearing mice. On the other hand, solid EC-bearing mice exposed to
γ-irradiation showed a considerable down-regulation in tumorBCL2 and NF-κB gene
expression (53.03% and 44.63%, respectively), compared to untreated EC-bearing
mice. Treatment of solid EC-bearing mice with ZnO-CA NPs alone or combined with
γ-irradiation rebound BCL2 gene expression level to the control level, and
induced a significant reduction in NF-κB (51.85% and 78.70%, respectively),
compared to untreated EC-bearing mice (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the gene expression ratios of B-cell lymphoma
2 (BCL2) and Nuclear Factor- kappa B (NF-κB) relative to Glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
Results are mean of 6 mice ± SE. Values with dissimilar superscripts are
significantly different. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice,
R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3
consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg
of Zinc Oxide – Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g body
weight, every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. Relative gene
expression was measured in thigh muscle of non-EC bearing mice (C and
ZnO-CA groups) or tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different
treated groups. P-value < 0.001.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the gene expression ratios of B-cell lymphoma
2 (BCL2) and Nuclear Factor- kappa B (NF-κB) relative to Glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).Results are mean of 6 mice ± SE. Values with dissimilar superscripts are
significantly different. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice,
R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3
consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg
of Zinc Oxide – Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g body
weight, every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. Relative gene
expression was measured in thigh muscle of non-EC bearing mice (C and
ZnO-CA groups) or tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different
treated groups. P-value < 0.001.
Western Blot Analysis of Phosphorylated ERK1/2 Protein Expression
Western blot analysis of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1
and 2 (p-ERK1/2) protein expression relative to β-actin was demonstrated in
Figure 4A. The
inoculation of solid EC into female mice caused a considerable up-regulation
(p < 0.001) in tumor p-ERK1/2 protein expression
(936.36%), as compared to non-EC-bearing mice. Exposure of solid EC-bearing mice
to γ-irradiation produced a considerable down-regulation in p-ERK1/2 protein
expression (55.26%), as compared to untreated solid EC-bearing mice. Similarly,
treatment of solid EC-bearing mice with ZnO-CA NPs alone or combined with
γ-irradiation generated a considerable down-regulation in p-ERK1/2 level (57.89%
and 74.56%, respectively), as compared to untreated solid EC-bearing mice (Figure 4B).
Figure 4.
(A): Western blot analysis of phosphorylated extracellular
signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (p-ERK1/2) protein expression relative
to β-actin. (B): Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc
Oxide–Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles treatment on the phosphorylated
extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (p-ERK 1/2) protein
expression relative to β-actin in the thigh muscle (control) or tumor
tissues.
Results are mean ± SE of 3 mice. Values with dissimilar superscripts are
significantly different. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice,
R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3
consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg
of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g bodyweight,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. Relative gene expression was
measured in thigh muscle of non EC bearing mice (C and ZnO-CA groups) or
tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
(A): Western blot analysis of phosphorylated extracellular
signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (p-ERK1/2) protein expression relative
to β-actin. (B): Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc
Oxide–Caffeic Acid Nanoparticles treatment on the phosphorylated
extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (p-ERK 1/2) protein
expression relative to β-actin in the thigh muscle (control) or tumor
tissues.Results are mean ± SE of 3 mice. Values with dissimilar superscripts are
significantly different. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice,
R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3
consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg
of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g bodyweight,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. Relative gene expression was
measured in thigh muscle of non EC bearing mice (C and ZnO-CA groups) or
tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) level
The inoculation of solid EC in female mice initiated a considerable sharp
increase (p < 0.001) in VCAM-1 level (666.66%) in the solid
tumors, as compared to the intact muscular tissue of non-EC-bearing mice.
Exposure to γ-irradiation triggered a significant decrease in VCAM-1 level
(58.39%), as compared to untreated EC-bearing mice. Similarly, solid EC-bearing
mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs along or combined with γ-irradiation gave rise to a
considerable decline in the tumorVCAM-1 levels (52.17% and 73.91%,
respectively), related to untreated solid EC-bearing mice (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1
(VCAM-1) level.
Results are mean ± SE of 6 mice. Values with dissimilar superscripts are
significantly different. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice,
R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3
consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg
of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g bodyweight,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks.VCAM-1 level was measured in
thigh muscle of non-EC bearing mice (C and ZnO-CA groups) or tumor
tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1
(VCAM-1) level.Results are mean ± SE of 6 mice. Values with dissimilar superscripts are
significantly different. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice,
R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3
consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg
of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g bodyweight,
every other day for 3 consecutive weeks.VCAM-1 level was measured in
thigh muscle of non-EC bearing mice (C and ZnO-CA groups) or tumor
tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
DNA Fragmentation Pattern
DNA extracted from the thigh muscles of normal control mice (lane 2), and ZnO-CA
NPs-treated mice (lane 3) or from the tumor tissue of untreated solid EC-bearing
mice (lane 4), showed dense DNA bands without any fragmentation. By contrast,
solid EC-bearing mice exposed to γ-irradiation (lane 5), or treated with ZnO-CA
NPs only (lane 6), or combined with γ-irradiation (lane 7) showed DNA damage, as
evidenced by the appearance of DNA strand breaks (Figure 6).
Figure (6).
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the DNA fragmentation pattern.
DNA marker (M) with 100-1000 base pair. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC)
bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma
(γ)-irradiation/week for 3 consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected
intraperitoneally with 5 mg of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles
(ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g body weight, every other day for 3 consecutive weeks.
DNA fragmentation pattern was measured in thigh muscle of non-EC bearing
mice (C and ZnO-CA NPs groups) or tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice
of different treated groups.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the DNA fragmentation pattern.DNA marker (M) with 100-1000 base pair. C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC)
bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy of whole-body gamma
(γ)-irradiation/week for 3 consecutive weeks, and ZnO-CA: Mice injected
intraperitoneally with 5 mg of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles
(ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g body weight, every other day for 3 consecutive weeks.
DNA fragmentation pattern was measured in thigh muscle of non-EC bearing
mice (C and ZnO-CA NPs groups) or tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice
of different treated groups.
Cell Cycle Analysis
Data of the cell cycle analysis presented in Table 4 and Figure 7 show a significant decrease
(P < 0.001) in G0/G1 populations (39.23%), whereas a
significant increase was recorded in S phase and G2/M populations (208.14% and
525.67%, respectively) in tumor tissues (E group), as compared to intact
muscular tissue of non-EC-bearing mice. By contrast, solid EC-bearing mice
exposed to γ-irradiation displayed a considerable increase in subG1 population
(711.94%) accompanied by a considerable decrease in S phase, and G2/M
populations (62.75% and 40.17%, respectively), as compared to untreated
EC-bearing mice. Similarly, a considerable increase was recorded in subG1
population (617.1%), associated with a considerable decline in G0/G1, S phase,
and G2/M populations (11.03%, 67.66%, and 46.72%, respectively) in the tumor
tissue of solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs, compared to untreated
EC-bearing mice. A more pronounced considerable increase was recorded in subG1
population (1187.1), concomitant with more considerable declines in G0/G1, S
phase, and G2/M populations (19.47%, 81.47%. and 80.5%, respectively) in the
tumor tissue of γ-irradiated and ZnO-CA NPs-treated mice, as compared to
untreated EC-bearing mice.
Table 4.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the Cell Cycle Modification.
Groups
SubG1
G0/G1
S phase
G2/M
C
Mean ± SE
3.33 ± 0.24a
85.07 ± 1.6a
8.6 ± 0.84ac
3.0 ± 0.67ae
ZnO-CA
Mean ± SE
2.97 ± 0.29a
87.4 ± 0.6a
7.9 ± 0.31a
2.07 ± 0.52a
%Change
−10.8
2.74
−8.14
−31
E
Mean ± SE
3.1 ± 0.17a
51.7 ± 1.71b
26.5 ± 0.67b
18.77 ± 0.55b
%Change
−6.91
−39.23
208.14
525.67
E+R
Mean ± SE
25.17 ± 0.38b
49.17 ± 0.86bc
9.87 ± 0.50c
11.23 ± 0.28c
%Change
655.86
−42.2
14.77
274.33
*%Change
711.94
−4.89
−62.75
−40.17
E+ZnO-CA
Mean ± SE
22.23 ± 0.85c
46.0 ± 0.83c
8.87 ± 0.37ac
10.0 ± 0.32c
%Change
567.56
−45.93
−5.49
233.33
*%Change
617.1
−11.03
−67.66
−46.72
E+ZnO-CA+R
Mean ± SE
39.9 ± 0.83d
41.63 ± 0.67d
4.91 ± 0.51d
3.66 ± 0.15e
% Change
1098
−51.06
−42.91
22
*% Change
1187.1
−19.47
−81.47
−80.5
F-ratio
827
333.69
184.85
204.53
Results are mean ± SE of 3 mice. Values with dissimilar
superscripts are significantly different. % Change versus control
group (C). * %Change versus untreated solid Ehrlich cancer (EC)
bearing mice. C: control, E: Solid EC bearing mice, R: mice exposed
to 2 Gy of whole body γ-irradiation/week, for 3 consecutive weeks,
and ZnO-CA: mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/100 g body
weight ZnO-CA NPs, every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. Flow
cytometry analysis of cell cycling was performed in the thigh muscle
of non Ehrlich bearing mice (C and ZnO-CA groups) or tumor tissues
of solid Ehrlich bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
Figure 7.
Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycling.
C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy
of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3 consecutive weeks, and
ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic
acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g body weight, every other day for 3
consecutive weeks. Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycling was performed
in thigh muscle of non-EC bearing mice (Control and ZnO-CA groups) or
tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
Effect of γ-Radiation Exposure and/or Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
Nanoparticles Treatment on the Cell Cycle Modification.Results are mean ± SE of 3 mice. Values with dissimilar
superscripts are significantly different. % Change versus control
group (C). * %Change versus untreated solid Ehrlich cancer (EC)
bearing mice. C: control, E: Solid EC bearing mice, R: mice exposed
to 2 Gy of whole body γ-irradiation/week, for 3 consecutive weeks,
and ZnO-CA: mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/100 g body
weight ZnO-CA NPs, every other day for 3 consecutive weeks. Flow
cytometry analysis of cell cycling was performed in the thigh muscle
of non Ehrlich bearing mice (C and ZnO-CA groups) or tumor tissues
of solid Ehrlich bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycling.C: control, E: Solid Ehrlich (EC) bearing mice, R: mice exposed to 2 Gy
of whole-body gamma (γ)-irradiation/week for 3 consecutive weeks, and
ZnO-CA: Mice injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic
acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)/100 g body weight, every other day for 3
consecutive weeks. Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycling was performed
in thigh muscle of non-EC bearing mice (Control and ZnO-CA groups) or
tumor tissues of solid EC bearing mice of different treated groups.
P-value < 0.001.
Histopathological Investigations
The thigh muscles from control mice (Figure 8a) and ZnO-CA NPs-treated mice
(Figure 8b)
displayed normal histopathological configuration of striated bundles
demonstrating normal muscular fibers. By contrast, solid EC tumors inoculated in
the thigh muscle of an untreated mouse (Figure 8c) revealed massive numbers of
intact anaplastic EC tumor cells implanted between skeletal muscle bundles and
criteria of malignancy with minimum cellular necrosis. On the other hand, solid
tumors from γ-irradiated EC-bearing mice (Figure 8d) demonstrated mild necrosis in
the focal areas of the EC tumor. Also, ZnO-CA NPs-treated solid EC-bearing mice
(Figure 8e)
exhibited implanted EC tumor cells between skeletal muscle bundles, with
moderate focal areas of necrosis. Moreover, solid EC tumors treated with ZnO-CA
NPs and γ-irradiation (Figure
8f) exhibited wide severe focal necrotic areas.
Figure 8.
Histopathological photomicrographs of (a); thigh muscle of control mice
(H&E stain, ×40), (b); thigh muscle of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs) treated mice (H&E stain, ×40), (c); solid
Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumors of untreated mice, (d); solid Ehrlich
carcinoma (EC) tumors of mice treated with gamma-irradiation (H&E
stain, ×16), (e); solid Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumors of mice treated
with Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs) (H&E stain,
×16), (f); solid Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumors of mice treated with
gamma-irradiation and Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)
(H&E stain, ×16). Solid Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumor cells implanted
between skeletal muscle bundles (↔) and criteria of malignancy necrosis
(↑).
Histopathological photomicrographs of (a); thigh muscle of control mice
(H&E stain, ×40), (b); thigh muscle of Zinc Oxide–Caffeic Acid
nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs) treated mice (H&E stain, ×40), (c); solid
Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumors of untreated mice, (d); solid Ehrlich
carcinoma (EC) tumors of mice treated with gamma-irradiation (H&E
stain, ×16), (e); solid Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumors of mice treated
with Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs) (H&E stain,
×16), (f); solid Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumors of mice treated with
gamma-irradiation and Zinc Oxide–Caffeic acid nanoparticles (ZnO-CA NPs)
(H&E stain, ×16). Solid Ehrlich carcinoma (EC) tumor cells implanted
between skeletal muscle bundles (↔) and criteria of malignancy necrosis
(↑).
Discussion
The X-ray diffraction peaks point out the nanocrystalline characters and purity of
ZnO NPs with hexagonal wurtzite structure. The 2θ values matched with those of the
standard hexagonal wurtzite structure ZnO as described earlier.[22,47] The
diffraction peaks were more concentrated and narrower, suggesting that the
nanostructures have the same crystalline character of ZnO materials.
Also, the sharp peak shows that there are large crystalline domains and a
high degree of crystallinity in the nanostructures. In the XRD pattern, no unusual
diffraction peaks were found, implying the nonexistence of other contaminations. The
lack of any peaks associated with contaminations suggests that CA was correctly
doped into the structure of ZnO NPs,
the TEM image revealed the absorption of CA on the surface of ZnO NPs as
spherical nanoparticles with approximately 23 nm particle size.FT-IR spectra of CA, handling KBr discs, revealed that the spectral assignments were
carried out based on data from the literature.[28-30,50
-52] The bands at: 3431 and
3350 cm−1 are appointed to ‒O‒H stretching vibration of OH aromatic,
3231 cm−1 is appointed to =C‒H stretching vibration of phenol ring,
3057, 3026, and 2988 cm−1 are appointed to C-H stretching vibration of
phenol ring, 2837–2565 cm−1 are appointed to ‒O‒H stretching vibration of
COOH (acid), 1645 cm−1 is appointed to ‒C=O stretching vibration of
‒O‒C=O, 1526 and 1451 cm−1 are appointed to C=C stretching vibration of
phenol ring, 1354 and 1218 cm−1 are appointed to ‒O‒H in-plane bending
vibration of phenolic OH, 972 cm−1 is appointed to =C‒H out-plane bending
vibration of Ar‒C=C, 851 cm−1 is appointed to out-plane bending vibration
of CH in the aromatic ring with 2 neighboring hydrogen atoms, 816 cm−1 is
appointed to in-plane bending vibration of C=O, 698 cm−1 is appointed to
out-plane bending vibration of C=O.[50
-52]FT-IR spectra of ZnO NPs demonstrated that the distinguished bands detected around
471 and 521 cm−1 resulted from the stretching vibration of Zn-O bond in
tetrahedral coordination. The band at 675 cm−1 is a very weak band formed
due to the stretching vibrations of Zn-O bonds in octahedral arrangements. The band
at 829 cm−1 is because of the configuration of tetrahedral coordinated
Zn. The bands at 1558, 1507, and 1338 cm−1 can be correlated with the
carboxylic group’s symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations resulting from the
by-products or zinc acetate residues, remained after ZnO NPs fabrication.
The broad peak at 3393 cm−1 and the narrow one nearby
2876 cm−1 are because of O-H group and CO2 stretching
fashion,[54,55] which were presented due to the adsorption of moisture when
FT-IR sample disc was prepared in an open atmosphere.
Consequently, FT-IR spectral analysis confirms the wurtzite structure of the
prepared nanoparticles.[57,58] This outcome is complies with the results of former
research.[56,59
-61]The successful amendment of ZnO NPs by CA was implemented by FT-IR spectroscopy. The
signals: 829 cm−1, 675 ν (Zn-O), 521 and 471 cm−1 confirm the
ZnO NPs wurtzite structure. 1558, 1507, and 1338 cm−1 bands can be
associated with the carboxylic group’s symmetric and asymmetric stretching
vibrations resulting from the by-products or zinc acetate residues, remained after
ZnO NPs fabrication.
The broad signals at 3393 and 3314 cm−1 originate from the hydroxy
group which belongs to both samples (ZnO NPs and CA). Signals at 3057, 3026 and
2988 cm−1 are allocated to the C-H stretching vibration of phenol
ring, the C-OH stretching vibrations band is shifted to 1269 cm−1
(instead of 1279 cm−1 in CA), 851 cm−1 is given to out-plane
bending vibration of CH in the aromatic ring of CA. However, the weak signal at
1218 cm−1 in-plane bending modes of the CH-C=C, 1121 cm−1
in-plane bending modes of CH, weak signal at 972 cm−1 is assigned to =C‒H
out-plane bending vibration of Ar‒C=C, the absence of signals at 3431 and
3350 cm−1 ν(OH)arom, 2837–2565 cm−1 ν(OH)acid),
1645 cm−1 ν(C=O) and 1354 cm−1 ν(CC) + β(OH)) suggest that
these molecules were adsorbed by the diph
relating the absence of those peaks to the adsorption of CA onto the surface
of the ZnO NPs, and confirming the static interaction of CA and ZnO NPs.A gradual decline in the viability percent and gradual increase in the toxicity
percent of MCF7 and HepG2cancer cells treated with different ZnO NPs concentrations
was perceived in a dose-dependent approach. This outcome follows the former results,
where ZnO NPs demonstrated cytotoxicity on numerous cancer cell lines, including
HepG2humanhepatocellular adenocarcinoma,
CAL 27 oral cancer,
and C2C12mouse myoblast cell lines.
Besides, CA revealed cytotoxic activity against MCF7 and HepG2cancer cell
lines in the current study, which corroborates previous investigations using cervical,
fibrosarcoma
and colon cancer
cell lines. More interestingly, a synergistic cytotoxic effect for ZnO-CA NPs
against HepG2 cells was recorded, which could reveal the capacity of CA to
potentiate the cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs against cancer cells. Inconsistent with our
finding, Balakrishnan et al
reported that gold nanoparticle–conjugated quercetin enhanced the anti-cancer
effect of free quercetin, and increased apoptosis in breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and
MDA-MB-231) more than free quercetin. The data also showed that ZnO-CA NPs exhibited
in vivo anticancer activity against solid EC-bearing mice. The data also proved that
ZnO-CA NPs and γ-irradiation act synergistically in reducing the volume and weight
of solid tumors, which is in agreement with Abdallah et al
and Huang et al
who reported that combination treatment of nanoparticles and γ-radiation
significantly suppressed tumor volume and weight in mice bearing tumors.
Furthermore, the combined therapy showed a diminution of the tumor area with
increasing necrotic cancer cells in the histopathological investigations, compared
to ZnO-CA NPs or γ-irradiated single treatments.In the present study, all mice bearing solid Ehrlich’s carcinoma had a considerable
increase in AST and ALT activities compared to untreated control, demonstrating the
damage of hepatic tissues and release of transaminases into the blood stream.
It is well known that many functions of vital organs in the body may be
impaired by the presence of tumor in the human body or experimental animals, even
though the location of the tumor does not specifically interfere with this role.
However, solid EC-bearing mice exposed to γ-irradiation displayed a considerable
decrease in serum AST and ALT activities, compared to solid EC-bearing mice. This
result is in agreement with (Abdelhalim and Moussa, 2013),
who mentioned that the values of those transaminases were considerably
decreased with exposure of rats to different γ-irradiation doses. In this study, a
more pronounced considerable decrease was observed in serum AST and ALT activities
of solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs, only or combined with
γ-irradiation, relative to solid untreated EC-bearing mice (E group). These findings
may sustain the hepatoprotective activity of ZnO-CA NPs, especially when combined
with gamma-radiation. It was demonstrated that CA maintains the structural integrity
of the membranes against alcohol-intoxication,
and protects the liver from cadmiumtoxicity in rats,
which is in line with previous findings demonstrated that chitosan-coated
nano-propolis protects liver and kidney against cisplatintoxicity in rats, and that
nano-propolis was more effective than propolis and had the potential to ameliorate
cisplatin negative effects, while overcoming serious side effects such as liver and
kidney damage.
The solid EC-bearing mice exposed to γ-irradiation displayed a slight
considerable rise of serum urea level, while treatment of solid EC-bearing mice with
ZnO-CA NPs, alone or combined with γ-radiation, exhibited a considerable increase in
serum urea level compared to untreated solid EC-bearing mice. The increased serum
urea could be attributed to enhanced protein breakdown after exposure to ionizing
radiation, where the end product of protein catabolism is urea.The current study indicates that normal animals treated with ZnO-CA NPs manifest
slight alterations in blood Hb concentration and PLTs count; several researchers
reported similar results in animals treated with ZnO NPs.[74,75] This work demonstrated that
mice bearing solid EC tumors manifest leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. It has been
reported that the increase in WBCs and PLTs counts are associated with many tumor
types.[76,77] Solid EC-bearing mice treated with γ-irradiation manifested a
non-considerable decline in Hb concentration and a considerable decline in RBCs,
WBCs, and PLTs counts, relative to untreated solid EC-bearing mice. Younis et al
demonstrated that RT can cause a decrease in the number of RBCs and Hb
concentration in cancerpatients. The peroxide formation and membrane cross-linkages
by γ-irradiation may disturb the lipid bilayer upper region by inducing water
diffusion and ultimately causing hemolysis of RBCs.
Mice bearing solid-EC treated with ZnO-CA NPs and/or γ-irradiation recorded a
sharp considerable decrease in WBCs, and PLTs counts, compared to untreated
EC-bearing mice. It is well known that CT and RT significantly lower WBCs and PLTs
counts in patients.The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is one such complex interconnected
signaling cascade with frequent involvement in oncogenesis, tumor progression, and
drug resistance. The MAPK family consists of a large number of kinases that altered
in cancers. The upregulation of the MAPK signaling pathway, including p38 MAPK, JNK,
and ERK1/2 can activate transcription factors such as NF-κB.
NF-κB activates the transcription of several genes involved in the
suppression of cell death by the mitochondrial pathway, whereas the anti-apoptotic
members of the Bcl-2 family antagonize the function of the pro-apoptotic members.
NF-κB also induces the expression of cell adhesion molecules including E-selectin,
intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and VCAM-1. The expression of genes
involved in many processes that play a key role in the development and progression
of cancer such as proliferation, migration, and apoptosis are regulated by NF-kB.The results demonstrate that inoculation of solid EC tumors into female mice caused
considerable upregulation in BCL2 and NF-κB gene expression, and enhancement in
VCAM-1 level, along with a significant upregulation of p-ERK1/2 protein expression
in the tumor tissue, compared to control animals. Campbell and Tait
mentioned that deregulation of Bcl2 proteins is now known as a common
occurrence in numerous cancer categories, and it is probable that pro-survival Bcl2
proteins regulation will bring about an improvement to the existing tumor
therapeutic approaches. Additionally, DiDonato et al
reported that NF-κB regulates the expression of genes that influence the
growth and progression of cancer. In several humanmalignancies, constitutive or
aberrant NF-κB activation was previously reported.
Furthermore, ERK1/2 signaling is involved as a main cell proliferation
organizer, and for this purpose, the ERK pathway inhibitors are entering clinical
studies as promising anticancer agents.
The development of numerous immunological disorders, including transplant
rejection, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer, are closely associated with VCAM-1.
VCAM-1 may be accompanied by tumor progression and metastasis.In this work, exposure of solid EC-bearing mice to γ-irradiation produced a marked
downregulation in BCL2 and NF-κB gene expression and a considerable decline in
VCAM-1 level as well as a remarkable downregulation in p-ERK1/2 protein expression
in the tumor tissue, compared to untreated EC-bearing mice. Filippovich et al
reported that irradiation directed the human myeloma cell line to apoptosis
via Bcl-2, and caspase-3 cleavage, leading to DNA degradation. Also, Wunderlich et al
observed a considerable decrease in NF-кB, p65, and IL-1β by applying a
single dose of 0.5 up to 2.0 Gy, in pre-activated peritoneal macrophages of the
radiosensitive BALB/cmice.Comparable results were detected in solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs.
The mitochondrial apoptotic pathway also mediates the genotoxic and cytotoxic
potential of ZnO NPs, whereas ROS reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential and
enhanced the Bax/Bcl2 ratio.
Kim and Jeong
reported that ZnO NPs blocked IκBα phosphorylation and degradation, and
accordingly inhibited the nuclear translocation of NF-κB in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
Also, Kim et al
mentioned that CA inhibits the NF-κB activation in endothelial cells via the
c-Src/ERK and NIK/IKK signal transduction pathways. Min et al
and Chang et al
reported that CA provoked apoptosis via inhibiting Bcl-2, the liberation of
cytochrome c, and caspase-3 activation, suggesting that CA prompted apoptosis via
the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, which implies strong anti-tumor chemopreventive
or chemotherapeutic activities of CA. On the contrary, Sun et al
reported that ZnO NPs significantly increased the mRNA levels of the
inflammatory markers VCAM-1, ICAM-1, MCP-1, and IL-8 in humancardiac microvascular
endothelial cells, suggesting the protective effect of CA against the inflammatory
response induced by ZnO NPs, which is in line with the previous finding that CA
inhibits VCAM-1 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.Combined treatment of ZnO-CA NPs and γ-irradiation demonstrated a synergistic
potential in down-regulating tumorBCL2 and NF-κB gene expression, decreasing VCAM-1
level and down-regulating p-ERK1/2 protein expression in tumor tissues, compared to
EC-bearing mice. This result is in agreement with Abdallah et al
who reported that combined treatment of EC-bearing mice with gadolinium oxide
nanocomposite and radiation led to a highly significant decrease in mitochondrial
enzymes’ activities, with activation of caspase-3 and a significant increase in DNA
fragmentation. Additionally, Nan et al
mentioned that quercetin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles notably enhance the
effect of quercetin, one of the flavonoid family members, on inhibiting the
NF-κB/COX-2 signaling pathway as well as ameliorating the skin edema caused by UVB
radiation. Furthermore, Wu et al
observed downregulation of ICAM-1 in cells treated with gold NPs, causing a
strong inhibition of cell invasion potential.Although RT-induced toxicity to cancer cells starts promptly and continues for weeks
to months after the end of treatment, cancer cell resistance to ionizing radiation
(IR) frequently causes local recurrences and metastases.[99,100] Thus, understanding the
molecular mechanisms responsible for radioresistance is crucial to improving RT
treatment. IR destroys cancer cells by inducing DNA damage, either directly or
indirectly, through highly reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated DNA damage. DNA
damage includes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most lethal form of damage,
which in turn leads to apoptosis-, necrosis-, and senescence- or autophagy-mediated
cancer cell death.
Furthermore, IR promotes cancer cell death by activating the host anti-tumor immunity.Cancer cells may evade IR-induced cell death through different mechanisms.
Indeed, the success of RT is determined by the ability of treatment (i) to
induce irreparable DNA damages; (ii) to redistribute the surviving cells into the
G2/M cell cycle phase, which is the most radiosensitive phase; (iii) to prevent the
surviving cells from repopulating the death fraction, and (iv) to promote the
re-oxygenation of hypoxic tumor areas.
Following radiation, ERK1/2 is activated, which sustains cancer cell
radioresistance, through dual tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation by the
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase enzyme (MEK1/2), and the activation, in
turn, leads to the phosphorylation/activation of over 160 substrates.
Collectively, inhibition of ERK1/2 activation and reduction in checkpoint
activation increases sensitivity of cells to DNA damage, which may cause apoptosis,
thereby enhancing chemotherapy’s efficacy.[104,105]Exposure of solid EC-bearing mice to γ-irradiation and/or treatment with ZnO-CA NPs
induced DNA damage, as evidenced by the appearance of DNA strand breaks. DNA has
commonly been known to be the critical target for ionizing radiation-induced cell
death. Ionizing radiations causes the formation of more complex lesions, and
multiply damaged sites within the DNA helical turns, breaking the double- and single
strands, thus triggering DNA base damage that results in mutations and cell death.
ZnO NPs induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA breakdown in numerous tumor
cell lines[91,107] due to the
intracellular ROS and oxidative stress assembly. Abdallah et al
mentioned that treatment of EC-bearing mice with gadolinium oxide
nanocomposite and γ irradiation produced a remarkable inhibition of DNA repair and
inhibition of DNA synthesis. Additionally, Subiel et al
showed that metal-based nano-enhancers could increase the number of initial
double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA following irradiation.Numerous studies mentioned that ZnO-NPs treatment resulted in a deposition and
recognizable peak at sub-G0/G1 that indicates the apoptotic
and dead cell population.[109
-112] Additionally, Murad et al
reported that ionizing radiation decreased cell viability of humanglioblastomaT98G cell line, and considerably enhanced the sub
G0/G1 phase. Several investigations reported that CA or
its related compound caffeic acid phenyl ester (CAPE) successfully repressed the
cancer cells propagation in vitro, through the activation of cell cycle arrest at
the G0/G1 phase, in different cell lines.[66,94,114] In
agreement with the previous finding, a significant increase in the sub G1 population
in the tumor tissue of solid EC-bearing mice treated with ZnO-CA NPs was recorded,
either alone or combined with γ-irradiation, associated with a considerable decline
in G0/G1 as well as S phase and G2/M populations denoting a
remarkable increase in the dead cell population and cell cycle arrest at
G0/G1, compared to untreated EC-bearing mice. Inconsistent
with this, Abdallah et al
reported the synergistic effect of gadolinium oxide nanocomposite and
radiation for induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.Solid ECmice exposed to radiation alone did not acquire show resistance to γ
radiation, and this evidence may be due to ERK1/2 inhibition, unrepaired DNA damage,
and decline in G2/M population; however, ZnO-CA NPs showed a strong ability to
enhance the radiosensitivity of solid EC tumor compared to γ-irradiation alone.Finally, this work demonstrates that ZnO-CA NPs radiosensitization mechanisms may
consist of ROS generation, targeting of DNA damage response, and repair, oxidative
stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, suppression of cell cycle checkpoint machinery,
and promoting cell death by a variety of mechanisms such as apoptosis, and necrosis,
accompanied by downregulation of p-ERK 1/2 protein expression, BCL2 and NF-κB gene
expressions, as well as VCAM-1 level inhibition.Animal experiments are frequently performed to provide scientific data and/or to
elucidate the mechanisms before the clinical manipulation of the newly formulated
drug. Dose conversion from animal to human is a critical step during developing a
new drug. To choose a suitable starting dose for the initial clinical trials, the
animal dose should be extrapolated to humans depending on the body surface area
(BSA), not only on the body weight, as recommended by previous investigation.
Body surface area scaling has been used to determine human dosages for a
variety of drugs, and FDA has recommended it as one method for using data from
animal model species to determine a safe starting dose for human clinical trials.
It also provides a more conservative dose estimate, especially for nanomaterials.
Generally, the body surface area seems to have a good correlation among
species with several parameters including oxygen utilization, caloric expenditure,
basal metabolism, blood volume, and circulating plasma protein.[37,117] Valic and Zheng
mentioned that the clinical starting dose may be determined by dividing the
estimated human equivalent dose (HED) of the rodent by a safety factor with a
default value of 10. The safety factor allows variability in extrapolating from
animal toxicity studies in humans resulting from uncertainties due to enhanced
sensitivity to pharmacologic activity in humans versus animals, difficulties in
detecting certain pathologies in animals (eg, headache, myalgia, and mental
disturbances), differences in receptor densities or affinities, and unexpected toxicities.
ZnO NPs are considered as “generally recognized as safe” and are approved by
FDA and the health risks of ZnO NPs and ZnO microparticles (ZnO MPs) are guided by
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, based on their unique
physicochemical characteristics via synthesis techniques.
The risk assessments of ZnO NPs via different exposure routes are necessary
to explore their clinical use. Accordingly, the use of ZnO NPs by humans should be
carefully considered.
According to our results that reflect the potential anticancer activity of
ZnO-CA NPs, CA may imply strong chemopreventive effects against any probable
toxicity induced by ZnO NPs.
Conclusion
Zinc Oxide-Caffeic acid (ZnO-CA) NPs are prepared in a simple method and exhibit in
vitro and in vivo anticancer activities. The in vivo ZnO-CA NPs anticancer activity
is augmented upon exposure of animals to γ-irradiation. The obtained results
indicate the effectiveness of ZnO-CA NPs in the treatment of EC-tumor, whereas
γ-irradiation augents this effect. Further investigations on ZnO-CA NPs
radiosensitization should be performed on an animal-model for a long period of time
after irradiation treatment, or in a radioresistant cancer cell type. As well as,
further explorations are warranted previous to the clinical application of ZnO-CA
NPs.
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Lei Chang; Peter Graham; Jingli Hao; Jie Ni; Junli Deng; Joseph Bucci; David Malouf; David Gillatt; Yong Li Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-03-08