Javier Reinoso Elbers1, Moises Rodríguez Socarrás2, Juan Gómez Rivas1, Ana Maria Autran3, Francesco Esperto4, Leonardo Tortolero5, Diego M Carrion1, Fernando Gómez Sancha1. 1. Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain. 2. Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain. moisessocarras@hotmail.com. 3. Oficina de Investigacion CAU (Confederacion Americana de Urologia), Madrid, Argentina. 4. Department of Urology, Campus-Biomédico University, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Urology, IMED Hospitales, Benidorm, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. RECENT FINDINGS: The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture's length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and FireflyTM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. RECENT FINDINGS: The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture's length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and FireflyTM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.