Literature DB >> 34104914

Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale.

Özgür Önal1, Hande Nur Eroğlu1, Fatma Yağmur Evcil1, Ahmet Nesimi Kişioğlu1, Ersin Uskun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was planned to adapt the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale to Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This research was conducted methodologically. The sample of the study consisted of 317 individuals from the patient relatives in the waiting rooms, who have children between the ages 9-16, who applied to the Suleyman Demirel University Hospital policlinic in December 2019. A questionnaire developed by the researcher and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale were used as data collection tools.
RESULTS: Explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis methods were used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. In the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin coefficient was 0.897 and the Bartlett test's chi-square value was 1319.67 and the result was significant (P <0.001). Considering the factor loads of the items, it varies between 0.608 and 0.845. As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, it was seen that the scale consists of two factors. This finding is consistent with the original form of the scale. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.86.
CONCLUSION: As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale was found to be a valid and reliable scale for the Turkish society, which consists of 9 items and 2 sub-dimensions.
Copyright © 2021 Turkish Pediatric Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; vaccine hesitancy scale; vaccine hesitation; validity

Year:  2021        PMID: 34104914      PMCID: PMC8152645          DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.20028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr        ISSN: 2757-6256


  5 in total

1.  Mandatory and recommended vaccination in the EU, Iceland and Norway: results of the VENICE 2010 survey on the ways of implementing national vaccination programmes.

Authors:  M Haverkate; F D'Ancona; C Giambi; K Johansen; P L Lopalco; V Cozza; E Appelgren
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2012-05-31

2.  Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story.

Authors:  E J Gangarosa; A M Galazka; C R Wolfe; L M Phillips; R E Gangarosa; E Miller; R T Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The vaccine hesitancy scale: Psychometric properties and validation.

Authors:  Gilla K Shapiro; Ovidiu Tatar; Eve Dube; Rhonda Amsel; Barbel Knauper; Anila Naz; Samara Perez; Zeev Rosberger
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson; Caitlin Jarrett; William S Schulz; Mohuya Chaudhuri; Yuqing Zhou; Eve Dube; Melanie Schuster; Noni E MacDonald; Rose Wilson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Vaccine hesitancy - vaccine refusal.

Authors:  Emel Gür
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2019-03-01
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  A systematic literature review to clarify the concept of vaccine hesitancy.

Authors:  Daphne Bussink-Voorend; Jeannine L A Hautvast; Lisa Vandeberg; Olga Visser; Marlies E J L Hulscher
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-08-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.