| Literature DB >> 34104656 |
Joseph S Tramer1, Lafi S Khalil1, Patrick Buckley2, Alexander Ziedas2, Patricia A Kolowich1, Kelechi R Okoroha1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA) players have a greater incidence of lower extremity injury compared with male players, yet no data exist on functional outcomes after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR).Entities:
Keywords: Achilles rupture; WNBA; basketball; female; performance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34104656 PMCID: PMC8172334 DOI: 10.1177/2325967121989982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Schematic depicting return to play in the first 3 years after injury. Red = no documented Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) games; green = documented WNBA game; blue = documented game overseas; yellow = year outside study period (2020).
Preinjury Player Characteristic, Game Utilization, and Performance Data Between the Study Groups
| Variable | Achilles (n = 10) | Control (n = 20) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 28.0 ± 4.8 | 28.8 ± 5.1 | .68 |
| Body mass index | 22.4 ± 1.5 | 22.7 ± 1.5 | .67 |
| Total games played | 170.0 ± 138.4 | 164.8 ± 120.8 | .83 |
| Total games started | 123.800 ± 135.6 | 124.0 ± 129.0 | .84 |
| Minutes per game | 24.2 ± 6.5 | 24.2 ± 5.7 | .98 |
| Player efficiency rating | 11.0 ± 4.4 | 10.0 ± 4.2 | .52 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 2.Game utilization trends in (A) games played and (B) minutes per game comparing the season after return to play (RTP) with the season before the index/injury season in Women’s National Basketball Association players. The players with Achilles repair significantly decreased their game utilization after RTP relative to the year before injury, while controls maintained their same workload. Controls demonstrated greater utilization than players with Achilles repair in the year after RTP. The overall reduction in game utilization (Δ) was significantly greater in players with Achilles repair than controls. *Significant difference between groups at a single time point. †Significant difference between 2 time points within a single group. ‡Significant difference between groups for the amount of change in game utilization over time.
Comparison of PER Before and After Surgery Between the Study Groups
| PER | Achilles | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year preoperatively | 11.0 ± 4.4 | 10.0 ± 4.2 | .52 |
| 1 year postoperatively | 7.1 ± 5.3 | 9.9 ± 3.7 | .08 |
| Difference | –3.9 ± 4.2 | –0.1 ± 4.5 |
|
Data are presented as mean ± SD. The boldface P value indicates a statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05). PER, player efficiency rating.